| Literature DB >> 33597988 |
Rużyłło Witold1, Elżbieta K Biernacka2, Olgierd Woźniak2, Mirosław Kowalski2, Mateusz Śpiewak3, Alicja Cicha-Mikołajczyk4, Aleksander Szczęsny2, Mariusz Kuśmierczyk5, Piotr Hoffman2, Marcin Demkow1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) is a non-surgical method of treatment for patients with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction after surgical repair of congenital heart defects (CHD). AIM: To evaluate the long-term results of TPVI performed in a single center.Material and methods: Over 10 years, TPVI was performed in 100 patients (mean age: 26.4 ±8.1 years), using Melody Medtronic or Sapien Edwards valves.Entities:
Keywords: congenital heart disease; pulmonary regurgitation; pulmonary stenosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33597988 PMCID: PMC7863798 DOI: 10.5114/aic.2020.99257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej ISSN: 1734-9338 Impact factor: 1.426
Patient characteristics
| Parameter | Results | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 100 | |
| Gender (male), | 53 | |
| Age at TPVI, mean ± SD [years] | 26.4 ±8.1 | |
| Congenital heart defect, | ||
| ToF | 65 | |
| PA, VSD | 15 | |
| TGA, VSD | 5 | |
| Aortic stenosis (Ross procedure) | 7 | |
| Other | 8 | |
| Time since last procedure, mean ± SD [years] | 17.5 ±7.5 | |
| Procedures, | 2.2 ±1.2 | |
| Operations, | 1.9 ±0.9 | |
| RVOT reconstruction, | ||
| Pulmonary homograft | 33 | |
| Aortic homograft | 8 | |
| Xenograft | 3 | |
| Patch | 56 | |
| RVOT dysfunction: | ||
| Predominant pulmonary stenosis | 25 | |
| Predominant pulmonary regurgitation | 43 | |
| Combined lesions | 32 | |
| ECHO ( | ||
| Pulmonary gradient, mean ± SD [mm Hg] | 49.7 (38.0) | |
| Pulmonary stenosis, | ||
| Severe, PG > 64 mm Hg | 28 | |
| Moderate, PG > 35 mm Hg | 27 | |
| Mild/none | 45 | |
| Pulmonary regurgitation, | ||
| None, trivial | 16 | |
| Mild | 9 | |
| Moderate | 20 | |
| Severe | 55 | |
| Tricuspid regurgitation, | ||
| None, trivial | 27 | |
| Mild | 54 | |
| Moderate | 17 | |
| Significant, severe | 2 | |
| MRI ( | ||
| Pulmonary regurgitation, | ||
| None, trivial | 13 (16) | |
| Mild | 16 (19) | |
| Moderate | 15 (18) | |
| Severe | 39 (47) | |
| Pulmonary regurgitation fraction (%), mean ± SD | 31.1 ±16.7 | |
| RVEDVI, mean ± SD [ml/m2] | 156.3 ±42.5 | |
| RVEF (%), mean ± SD | 46.4 ±9.2 | |
| NYHA class, | ||
| I | 21 | |
| II | 57 | |
| III | 22 | |
| IV | 0 | |
| Peak VO2, mean ± SD ( | 23.4 ±6.9 | |
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging, n – number of patients with data available, PA – VSD – pulmonary atresia and ventricular septum defect, peak VO2 – maximal oxygen uptake, PG – pulmonary gradient, ToF – tetralogy of Fallot, TPVI – transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, RVEDVI – right ventricular end-diastolic volume index, RVEF – right ventricular ejection fraction, SD – standard deviation, TGA – VSD – transposition of great arteries with VSD.
Procedure characteristics
| Parameter | Results | |
|---|---|---|
| Two-stage procedure, | 33 | |
| Valve, | ||
| Melody Medtronic (MM) | 49 | |
| Sapien Edwards (SE) | 51 | |
| Valve size [mm], | ||
| 18 (MM) | 5 | |
| 20 (MM) | 7 | |
| 22 (MM) | 37 | |
| 23 (SE) | 6 | |
| 26 (SE) | 24 | |
| 29 (SE) | 21 | |
| SE type, | ||
| SE | 17 | |
| SE XL | 18 | |
| SE S3 | 16 | |
| Time of procedure, mean ± SD [min] | 165.7 (37.7) | |
| Time of fluoro, mean ± SD [min] | 28.2 (11.9) | |
| Severe procedural complications, | 7 | |
| Urgent surgery | 5 | |
| Elective surgery | 2 | |
| Hospitalization (time), mean ± SD [h] | 84.4 (32.2) | |
MM – Melody Medtronic valve, SD – standard deviation, SE – Sapien Edwards valve.
Figure 1Right ventricular outflow dysfunction before TPVI and short- and long-term results of the procedure: A – pulmonary regurgitation (ECHO), B – pulmonary gradient (ECHO Doppler)
Results in 93 patients after successful TPVI
| Parameter | Pre | 1 day | 1 month | 1 year | 3–4 years | 8–10 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG [mm Hg] (ECHO) | Mean | 49.0 | 27.6 | 25.8 | 24.9 | 25.1 | 26.9 |
| SD | 37.8 | 14.9 | 15.0 | 14.7 | 10.7 | 11.1 | |
| No pts | 93 | 93 | 90 | 86 | 54 | 20 | |
| < 0.0001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
| PRF (%)* (MRI) | Mean | 37.8 | 3.5 | 4.7 | |||
| SD | 13.2 | 4.3 | 5.3 | ||||
| No pts | 83 | 47 | 83 | ||||
| < 0.0001 | NS | ||||||
| RVEDVI [ml/m2] (MRI) | Mean | 156.8 | 132.7 | 124.8 | 120.0 | 107.5 | |
| SD | 42.8 | 42.8 | 39.7 | 32.6 | 31.7 | ||
| No pts | 80 | 47 | 78 | 40 | 12 | ||
| < 0.0001 | < 0.0001** | NS | NS | ||||
| RVEF (%) (MRI) | Mean | 46.4 | 47.9 | 48.1 | 48.4 | 49.8 | |
| SD | 9.4 | 10.4 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 11.4 | ||
| No pts | 81 | 47 | 78 | 41 | 12 | ||
| NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||
| VO2 [ml/kg/min] | Mean | 21.4 | 24.2 | 25.4 | |||
| SD | 5.9 | 5.4 | 6.7 | ||||
| No pts | 43 | 43 | 43 | ||||
| 0.009 | 0.004 | ||||||
| PG [mm Hg] (ECHO) in pts with severe PS | Mean | 96.6 | 40.9 | 38.5 | 35.8 | 31.8 | 31.7 |
| SD | 31.0 | 18.0 | 21 | 22 | 11 | 12 | |
| No pts | 26 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 18 | 11 | |
| < 0.0001 | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
| RVEDVI [ml/m2] (MRI), in pts with severe PS | Mean | 121.8 | 110.6 | 108.4 | 107.1 | 95.9 | |
| SD | 38 | 33 | 32 | 31 | 24 | ||
| No pts | 18 | 17 | 21 | 14 | 7 | ||
| 0.014 | NS | NS | NS | ||||
| RVEF (%) (MRI), in pts with severe PS | Mean | 44.8 | 52.8 | 52.7 | 50.2 | 51.9 | |
| SD | 13 | 12 | 10 | 9.8 | 10 | ||
| No pts | 19 | 17 | 21 | 15 | 7 | ||
| 0.0009 | 0.0027 | NS | NS | ||||
| VO2 [ml/kg/min], in pts with severe PS | Mean | 21.7 | 23.3 | 25.9 | 26.2 | ||
| SD | 5.9 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 4.2 | |||
| No pts | 18 | 22 | 17 | 10 | |||
| 0.05 | 0.02 | NS | |||||
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging, PG – pulmonary gradient, PRF – pulmonary regurgitation fraction, RVEDVI – right ventricular end diastolic volume index, RVEF – right ventricular ejection. *PRF difficult to calculate, in most patients PR volume was about 2–3 ml. **Pre- and 1-year comparison.
Figure 2Short- and long-term results of TPVI in 93 patients after successful procedure: A – NYHA class, B –right ventricular end diastolic volume
Serious adverse events
| Valve | Lifetime anti-platelet therapy | Time after TPVI | Valve dysfunction | Predisposing factors, pathogen | Only medical treatment | Re-intervention | Re-operation | Death | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infective endocarditis: | |||||||||||
| MM | No | 5 mo | PS | Staph. epidermidis | Yes | Yes, unsuccessful | Yes | ||||
| MM | No | 3 y | PR | Tonsillitis, incompliance, | Yes | Yes (sepsis) | |||||
| SE | No | 2 y | PS | Poor dental hygiene, incompliance, | Yes, unsuccessful | Yes (sepsis, multiorgan failure) | |||||
| MM | No | 6 y | PR | ? | Yes | ||||||
| MM | No | 3 y | PS | Infective diarrhea, | Yes, successful | ||||||
| MM | No | 2 y | PS + PR | Dental procedure | Yes | ||||||
| MM | Yes | 4 y | PS | Dental procedure | Yes | ||||||
| Valve mismatch due to the increased body mass: | |||||||||||
| MM | No | 2 y | PS | Body mass increase (31 vs. 45) | Yes, unsuccessful | Yes | |||||
MM – Melody Medtronic valve, SE – Sapien Edwards valve, mo – month, y – year, PS – pulmonary stenosis, PR – pulmonary regurgitation, incompliance – risky behavior and incompliance with IE prevention.