| Literature DB >> 33597541 |
William Yuan1, Brett K Beaulieu-Jones2, Kun-Hsing Yu2, Scott L Lipnick2,3,4, Nathan Palmer2, Joseph Loscalzo5, Tianxi Cai2,6,7, Isaac S Kohane8.
Abstract
One of the primary tools that researchers use to predict risk is the case-control study. We identify a flaw, temporal bias, that is specific to and uniquely associated with these studies that occurs when the study period is not representative of the data that clinicians have during the diagnostic process. Temporal bias acts to undermine the validity of predictions by over-emphasizing features close to the outcome of interest. We examine the impact of temporal bias across the medical literature, and highlight examples of exaggerated effect sizes, false-negative predictions, and replication failure. Given the ubiquity and practical advantages of case-control studies, we discuss strategies for estimating the influence of and preventing temporal bias where it exists.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33597541 PMCID: PMC7889612 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21390-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919