Literature DB >> 33597296

Stable reliability diagrams for probabilistic classifiers.

Timo Dimitriadis1,2, Tilmann Gneiting2,3, Alexander I Jordan2.   

Abstract

A probability forecast or probabilistic classifier is reliable or calibrated if the predicted probabilities are matched by ex post observed frequencies, as examined visually in reliability diagrams. The classical binning and counting approach to plotting reliability diagrams has been hampered by a lack of stability under unavoidable, ad hoc implementation decisions. Here, we introduce the CORP approach, which generates provably statistically consistent, optimally binned, and reproducible reliability diagrams in an automated way. CORP is based on nonparametric isotonic regression and implemented via the pool-adjacent-violators (PAV) algorithm-essentially, the CORP reliability diagram shows the graph of the PAV-(re)calibrated forecast probabilities. The CORP approach allows for uncertainty quantification via either resampling techniques or asymptotic theory, furnishes a numerical measure of miscalibration, and provides a CORP-based Brier-score decomposition that generalizes to any proper scoring rule. We anticipate that judicious uses of the PAV algorithm yield improved tools for diagnostics and inference for a very wide range of statistical and machine learning methods.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration; discrimination ability; probability forecast; score decomposition; weather prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33597296      PMCID: PMC7923594          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016191118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  One model, several results: the paradox of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model.

Authors:  G Bertolini; R D'Amico; D Nardi; A Tinazzi; G Apolone
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2000

2.  Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.

Authors:  Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.

Authors:  Victoria Stodden; Marcia McNutt; David H Bailey; Ewa Deelman; Yolanda Gil; Brooks Hanson; Michael A Heroux; John P A Ioannidis; Michela Taufer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Probabilistic prediction in patient management and clinical trials.

Authors:  D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The bias of isotonic regression.

Authors:  Ran Dai; Hyebin Song; Rina Foygel Barber; Garvesh Raskutti
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.125

6.  Veridical data science.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Karl Kumbier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.