Literature DB >> 33596952

"We don't want problems": reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia.

Stephanie Andrea Küng1, Jasmine Danette Wilkins2, Fernanda Díaz de León3, Freddy Huaraz4, Erin Pearson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The misuse of conscientious objection (CO) is a significant barrier to legal abortion access in many countries, especially in Latin America. We examine the reasons for denial of legal abortion services in Mexico and Bolivia and identify ways to mitigate the misuse of CO.
METHODS: We conducted 34 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions in two states in Mexico and four departments in Bolivia. Results were coded and categorized using a thematic analysis approach.
RESULTS: Denial of abortion services based on CO is widespread in health facilities in Mexico and Bolivia and is primarily employed for reasons other than moral, religious, or ethical considerations. The main reasons for denial of services based on CO is lack of knowledge about abortion-related laws and fear of legal problems in abortion service provision. Conversely, the main reason to provide services is to comply with relevant laws. Denying services under the guise of CO negatively impacts pregnant people and health care teams, including fewer safe abortion options and increased workload and stigma, respectively. Most respondents cited training and education on abortion law as the foremost way to mitigate the negative impacts of the misuse of CO.
CONCLUSIONS: For many health personnel, knowing, understanding, and following the law is reason enough to provide abortion services. Individuals who object due to lack of knowledge about laws and fear of legal problems represent a key population that can be sensitized and equipped with the necessary information and resources to provide legal abortion services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Conscientious objection; Latin America and the caribbean; Law and policy; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33596952      PMCID: PMC7890982          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  10 in total

1.  Experiences and opinions of health-care professionals regarding legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Xipatl Contreras; Marieke G van Dijk; Tahilin Sanchez; Patricio Sanhueza Smith
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2011-09

2.  Striking a balance: conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the Colombian perspective.

Authors:  Luisa Cabal; Monica Arango Olaya; Valentina Montoya Robledo
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2014-12-11

Review 3.  Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: a White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses.

Authors:  Wendy Chavkin; Liddy Leitman; Kate Polin
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  "The Fetus Is My Patient, Too": Attitudes Toward Abortion and Referral Among Physician Conscientious Objectors in Bogotá, Colombia.

Authors:  Lauren R Fink; Kaitlyn K Stanhope; Roger W Rochat; Oscar A Bernal
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 5.  Abortion care in Ireland: Developing legal and ethical frameworks for conscientious provision.

Authors:  Mary Donnelly; Claire Murray
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  [Mexico City's Legal Abortion Program: health workers' experiences].

Authors:  Claudia Díaz-Olavarrieta; Vanessa M Cravioto; Aremis Villalobos; Natalia Deeb-Sossa; Laura García; Sandra G García
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2012-12

7.  [Legal health services of abortion in Uruguay. Strategies of the primary health care public services].

Authors:  Alejandra López-Gómez; Martín Couto; Gabriela Píriz; Ana Monza; Lilián Abracinskas; María Luisa Ituarte
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

8.  Development of a Conceptual Model and Survey Instrument to Measure Conscientious Objection to Abortion Provision.

Authors:  Laura Florence Harris; John Koku Awoonor-Williams; Caitlin Gerdts; Laura Gil Urbano; Ana Cristina González Vélez; Jodi Halpern; Ndola Prata; Peter Baffoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regulation of Conscientious Objection to Abortion: An International Comparative Multiple-Case Study.

Authors:  Wendy Chavkin; Laurel Swerdlow; Jocelyn Fifield
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2017-06

10.  Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jane Harries; Diane Cooper; Anna Strebel; Christopher J Colvin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Opinions of Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology on the Indications for Pregnancy Termination in Poland-A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kornelia Zaręba; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Stanisław Wójtowicz; Ewelina Kołb-Sielecka; Jolanta Banasiewicz; Michał Ciebiera; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.