Literature DB >> 33596842

Comparing mortality between positive and negative blood culture results: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of a multicenter cohort.

Aibo Liu1,2, Chia-Hung Yo3, Lu Nie4, Hua Yu1,2, Kuihai Wu4, Hoi Sin Tong5, Tzu-Chun Hsu6, Wan-Ting Hsu7, Chien-Chang Lee8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association between blood culture status and mortality among sepsis patients remains controversial hence we conducted a tri-center retrospective cohort study to compare the early and late mortality of culture-negative versus culture-positive sepsis using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.
METHODS: Adult patients with suspected sepsis who completed the blood culture and procalcitonin tests in the emergency department or hospital floor were eligible for inclusion. Early mortality was defined as 30-day mortality, and late mortality was defined as 30- to 90-day mortality. IPTW was calculated from propensity score and was employed to create two equal-sized hypothetical cohorts with similar covariates for outcome comparison.
RESULTS: A total of 1405 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 216 (15.4%) yielded positive culture results and 46 (21.3%) died before hospital discharge. The propensity score model showed that diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, and hepatobiliary infection were independently associated with positive blood culture results. There was no significant difference in early mortality between patients with positive or negative blood culture results. However, culture-positive patients had increased late mortality as compared with culture-negative patients in the full cohort (IPTW-OR, 1.95, 95%CI: 1.14-3.32) and in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (IPTW-OR, 1.92, 95%CI: 1.10-3.33). After excluding Staphylococcal bacteremia patients, late mortality difference became nonsignificant (IPTW-OR, 1.78, 95%CI: 0.87-3.62).
CONCLUSIONS: Culture-positive sepsis patients had comparable early mortality but worse late mortality than culture-negative sepsis patients in this cohort. Persistent Staphylococcal bacteremia may have contributed to the increased late mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse probability of treatment weighting; Mortality; Sepsis; Staphylococcus aureus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33596842     DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-05862-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


  11 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: issues and controversies.

Authors:  J A Washington; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

2.  Culture-Negative Septic Shock Compared With Culture-Positive Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shravan Kethireddy; Beliz Bilgili; Amanda Sees; H Lester Kirchner; Uchenna R Ofoma; R Bruce Light; Yazdan Mirzanejad; Dennis Maki; Aseem Kumar; A Joseph Layon; Joseph E Parrillo; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Persistence in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence, characteristics of patients and outcome.

Authors:  Riad Khatib; Leonard B Johnson; Mohamad G Fakih; Kathleen Riederer; Amir Khosrovaneh; M Shamse Tabriz; Mamta Sharma; Sajjad Saeed
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2006

4.  Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Sepsis: A Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J G Sigakis; Elizabeth Jewell; Michael D Maile; Sandro K Cinti; Brian T Bateman; Milo Engoren
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Predictors of bacteremia and gram-negative bacteremia in patients with sepsis. The Veterans Affairs Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; C Shatney; J Sheagren; C Sprung
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-03

6.  Culture-Negative Severe Sepsis: Nationwide Trends and Outcomes.

Authors:  Shipra Gupta; Ankit Sakhuja; Gagan Kumar; Eric McGrath; Rahul S Nanchal; Kianoush B Kashani
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis.

Authors:  Nicasio Mancini; Silvia Carletti; Nadia Ghidoli; Paola Cichero; Roberto Burioni; Massimo Clementi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Positive blood culture is not associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Szu-Chun Yang; Kuang-Ming Liao; Chang-Wen Chen; Wei-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.424

9.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis.

Authors:  C Brun-Buisson; F Doyon; J Carlet; P Dellamonica; F Gouin; A Lepoutre; J C Mercier; G Offenstadt; B Régnier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size.

Authors:  Romain Pirracchio; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Positive and Negative Blood Culture Septic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Long Yang; Yue Lin; Junyu Wang; Jianmei Song; Bing Wei; Xiangqun Zhang; Jun Yang; Bo Liu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.