Daniel P Kollet1, Ana Beatriz Marenco1, Nathan L Bellé1, Eduardo Barbosa1, Liliana Boll1, Bruna Eibel1, Gustavo Waclawovsky1, Alexandre Machado Lehnen2. 1. Institute of Cardiology of Rio Grande Do Sul/University Foundation of Cardiology, Unidade de Pesquisa, 3ºAndar, Av. Princesa Isabel, 395 Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-001, Brazil. 2. Institute of Cardiology of Rio Grande Do Sul/University Foundation of Cardiology, Unidade de Pesquisa, 3ºAndar, Av. Princesa Isabel, 395 Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-001, Brazil. amlehnen@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Aerobic exercise improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness after myocardial infarction (MI), but the effects of isometric exercise on cardiovascular parameters are still uncertain. We aimed to assess the effects of one session of aerobic or isometric exercise on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in post-MI volunteers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS:Twenty post-MI patients undergoing PCI were randomized to aerobic (AE, n = 10) or isometric (IE, n = 10) exercise groups. We evaluated cardiac structure and function (echocardiographic); carotid plaque presence (ultrasound). FMD and PWV were measured 10 min before and 10 min after the intervention: a single session of moderate-intensity AE (30 min; ratings 12-14 on Borg's scale or 50-60% HRreserve) or handgrip IE (four two-minute bilateral contractions; 30% maximal voluntary contraction; 1-min rest). Generalized estimating equations (Bonferroni post-hoc) was used to assess differences (p ≤ 0.050). RESULTS:FMD improved only in the AE group (Δ = 4.9%; p = 0.034), with no difference between groups after exercise. Even after adjustment (for baseline brachial artery diameter) the effectiveness of AE remained (p = 0.025) with no change in the IE group. PWV was slightly reduced from baseline in the AE group (Δ = 0.61 m/s; p = 0.044), and no difference when compared to the IE group. Peripheral vascular resistance decreased in AE versus IE (p = 0.050) and from baseline (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS:Vascular measurements (FMD and PWV) improved after a single session of AE. There are apparently no benefits following a session of IE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and ID number NCT04000893.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness after myocardial infarction (MI), but the effects of isometric exercise on cardiovascular parameters are still uncertain. We aimed to assess the effects of one session of aerobic or isometric exercise on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in post-MI volunteers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Twenty post-MI patients undergoing PCI were randomized to aerobic (AE, n = 10) or isometric (IE, n = 10) exercise groups. We evaluated cardiac structure and function (echocardiographic); carotid plaque presence (ultrasound). FMD and PWV were measured 10 min before and 10 min after the intervention: a single session of moderate-intensity AE (30 min; ratings 12-14 on Borg's scale or 50-60% HRreserve) or handgrip IE (four two-minute bilateral contractions; 30% maximal voluntary contraction; 1-min rest). Generalized estimating equations (Bonferroni post-hoc) was used to assess differences (p ≤ 0.050). RESULTS:FMD improved only in the AE group (Δ = 4.9%; p = 0.034), with no difference between groups after exercise. Even after adjustment (for baseline brachial artery diameter) the effectiveness of AE remained (p = 0.025) with no change in the IE group. PWV was slightly reduced from baseline in the AE group (Δ = 0.61 m/s; p = 0.044), and no difference when compared to the IE group. Peripheral vascular resistance decreased in AE versus IE (p = 0.050) and from baseline (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular measurements (FMD and PWV) improved after a single session of AE. There are apparently no benefits following a session of IE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov and ID number NCT04000893.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Ellen A Dawson; Mark A Black; Maria T E Hopman; Nigel T Cable; Daniel J Green Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: A H Herdy; F López-Jiménez; C P Terzic; M Milani; R Stein; T Carvalho; S Serra; C G Araujo; P C Zeballos; C V Anchique; G Burdiat; K González; G González; R Fernández; C Santibáñez; J P Rodríguez-Escudero; H Ilarraza-Lomelí Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: S Maeda; T Otsuki; M Iemitsu; M Kamioka; J Sugawara; S Kuno; R Ajisaka; H Tanaka Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2006-08-18 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner; Devin Mann; Anthony J Viera; Shunichi Homma; Joseph F Polak; R Graham Barr; David Herrington; Steven Shea Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Katrina L Piercy; Richard P Troiano; Rachel M Ballard; Susan A Carlson; Janet E Fulton; Deborah A Galuska; Stephanie M George; Richard D Olson Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Martin Reindl; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Markus Theurl; Daniel Basic; Christopher Eigler; Magdalena Holzknecht; Johannes Mair; Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug; Bernhard Metzler Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Henrik Pettersson; Helene Alexanderson; Janet L Poole; Janos Varga; Malin Regardt; Anne-Marie Russell; Yasser Salam; Kelly Jensen; Jennifer Mansour; Tracy Frech; Carol Feghali-Bostwick; Cecília Varjú; Nancy Baldwin; Matty Heenan; Kim Fligelstone; Monica Holmner; Matthew R Lammi; Mary Beth Scholand; Lee Shapiro; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Lesley Ann Saketkoo Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 4.991
Authors: Yong Zhang; Ya-Jun Zhang; Hong-Wei Zhang; Wei-Bing Ye; Mallikarjuna Korivi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Regina Grazuleviciene; Sandra Andrusaityte; Audrius Dėdelė; Tomas Grazulevicius; Leonas Valius; Aurimas Rapalavicius; Violeta Kapustinskiene; Inga Bendokiene Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390