| Literature DB >> 33596622 |
Sunil Ganekal1, Ashwini Nagarajappa1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the ocular manifestations, its severity and sequelae in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Entities:
Keywords: Ocular manifestations; Ocular severity score; Stevens-Johnson syndrome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33596622 PMCID: PMC8200586 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Ophthalmol ISSN: 1011-8942
Fig. 1(A) Ocular involvement in patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis, (B) Stevens- Johnson syndrome patient with conjunctival pseudomembrane, and (C) flourescein staining of the cornea. Informed consent for publication of the clinical images was obtained from the patient.
Fig. 2Bilateral healed corneal perforation and corneal opacity with vascularization. Standard photos of ocular surface grading scores in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Correlation of severity of dermatological manifestation with acute and chronic OSSs
| Dermatological diagnosis | Mean of OSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OSS0 | SJS | 4.46 ± 2.47 | 0.001 |
| TEN | 7.42 ± 1.98 | ||
| OSS6 | SJS | 1.24 ± 1.97 | 0.001 |
| TEN | 3.26 ± 2.6 |
OSS = ocular severity score; SJS = Stevens-Johnson syndrome; TEN = toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Severity grading of ocular manifestations in the acute stage of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
| Severity grade | Conjunctival hyperemia | Conjunctival inflammatory adhesion | Lid margin involvement | Corneal staining |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 (0) | 26 (40) | 11(16.9) | 24 (36.9) |
| 1 | 12 (18.5) | 19 (29.2) | 33 (50.8) | 11 (16.9) |
| 2 | 41 (63.1) | 18 (27.7) | 16 (24.6) | 26 (40) |
| 3 | 12 (18.4) | 2 (3.1) | 5 (7.7) | 4 (6.2) |
Values are presented as number (%).
Severity grading of ocular manifestations at 6-month follow-up
| Severity grade | Conjunctival hyperemia | Lid margin involvement | Corneal staining | Corneal opacification | Corneal neovascularization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 51 (78.5) | 45 (69.2) | 29 (44.6) | 59 (90.8) | 69 (92) |
| 1 | 9 (13.8) | 16 (24.6) | 26 (40) | 6 (7.2) | 5 (6.7) |
| 2 | 3 (4.6) | 4 (6.2) | 10 (15.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) |
| 3 | 2 (3.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Values are presented as number (%).
Fig. 3Bilateral corneal perforation. Informed consent for publication of the clinical images was obtained from the patient.