Literature DB >> 33596212

Feasibility of integrating canine olfaction with chemical and microbial profiling of urine to detect lethal prostate cancer.

Claire Guest1, Rob Harris1, Karen S Sfanos2,3, Eva Shrestha2, Alan W Partin3, Bruce Trock3, Leslie Mangold3, Rebecca Bader4, Adam Kozak4, Scott Mclean4, Jonathan Simons5, Howard Soule5, Thomas Johnson5, Wen-Yee Lee6, Qin Gao6, Sophie Aziz1, Patritsia Maria Stathatou7, Stephen Thaler8, Simmie Foster9, Andreas Mershin7.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the developed world. A more sensitive and specific detection strategy for lethal prostate cancer beyond serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) population screening is urgently needed. Diagnosis by canine olfaction, using dogs trained to detect cancer by smell, has been shown to be both specific and sensitive. While dogs themselves are impractical as scalable diagnostic sensors, machine olfaction for cancer detection is testable. However, studies bridging the divide between clinical diagnostic techniques, artificial intelligence, and molecular analysis remains difficult due to the significant divide between these disciplines. We tested the clinical feasibility of a cross-disciplinary, integrative approach to early prostate cancer biosensing in urine using trained canine olfaction, volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) artificial neural network (ANN)-assisted examination, and microbial profiling in a double-blinded pilot study. Two dogs were trained to detect Gleason 9 prostate cancer in urine collected from biopsy-confirmed patients. Biopsy-negative controls were used to assess canine specificity as prostate cancer biodetectors. Urine samples were simultaneously analyzed for their VOC content in headspace via GC-MS and urinary microbiota content via 16S rDNA Illumina sequencing. In addition, the dogs' diagnoses were used to train an ANN to detect significant peaks in the GC-MS data. The canine olfaction system was 71% sensitive and between 70-76% specific at detecting Gleason 9 prostate cancer. We have also confirmed VOC differences by GC-MS and microbiota differences by 16S rDNA sequencing between cancer positive and biopsy-negative controls. Furthermore, the trained ANN identified regions of interest in the GC-MS data, informed by the canine diagnoses. Methodology and feasibility are established to inform larger-scale studies using canine olfaction, urinary VOCs, and urinary microbiota profiling to develop machine olfaction diagnostic tools. Scalable multi-disciplinary tools may then be compared to PSA screening for earlier, non-invasive, more specific and sensitive detection of clinically aggressive prostate cancers in urine samples.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33596212      PMCID: PMC7888653          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  35 in total

1.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Canine olfactory detection of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Leon Frederick Campbell; Luke Farmery; Susannah Mary Creighton George; Paul B J Farrant
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-10-14

Review 3.  Canine olfaction as an alternative to analytical instruments for disease diagnosis: understanding 'dog personality' to achieve reproducible results.

Authors:  Klaus Hackner; Joachim Pleil
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.262

4.  Characteristic odour in the blood reveals ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  György Horvath; Håkan Andersson; Gunnar Paulsson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Profiling the Urinary Microbiome in Men with Positive versus Negative Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Shrestha; James R White; Shu-Han Yu; Ibrahim Kulac; Onur Ertunc; Angelo M De Marzo; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Leslie A Mangold; Alan W Partin; Karen S Sfanos
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors.

Authors:  G Peng; M Hakim; Y Y Broza; S Billan; R Abdah-Bortnyak; A Kuten; U Tisch; H Haick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers.

Authors:  Michael McCulloch; Tadeusz Jezierski; Michael Broffman; Alan Hubbard; Kirk Turner; Teresa Janecki
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Dolosigranulum pigrum causing nosocomial pneumonia and septicemia.

Authors:  Hervé Lécuyer; Juliette Audibert; Astrid Bobigny; Catherine Eckert; Caroline Jannière-Nartey; Annie Buu-Hoï; Jean-Luc Mainardi; Isabelle Podglajen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection.

Authors:  Hideto Sonoda; Shunji Kohnoe; Tetsuro Yamazato; Yuji Satoh; Gouki Morizono; Kentaro Shikata; Makoto Morita; Akihiro Watanabe; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Fumio Inoue; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Early Recovery of Salmonella from Food Using a 6-Hour Non-selective Pre-enrichment and Reformulation of Tetrathionate Broth.

Authors:  Ninalynn Daquigan; Christopher J Grim; James R White; Darcy E Hanes; Karen G Jarvis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of urinary biosensors.

Authors:  Kit Man Chan; Jonathan M Gleadle; Michael O'Callaghan; Krasimir Vasilev; Melanie MacGregor
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Canine Olfaction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Maureen Maurer; Todd Seto; Claire Guest; Amendeep Somal; Catherine Julian
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.423

3.  Drift compensation on electronic nose data for non-invasive diagnosis of prostate cancer by urine analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Bax; Stefano Prudenza; Giulia Gaspari; Laura Capelli; Fabio Grizzi; Gianluigi Taverna
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Assessing volatile organic compounds exposure and prostate-specific antigen: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Chengcheng Wei; Yumao Chen; Yu Yang; Dong Ni; Yu Huang; Miao Wang; Xiong Yang; Zhaohui Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29

5.  Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Fabio Grizzi; Lorenzo Tidu; Carmen Bax; Matteo Zanoni; Paolo Vota; Beatrice Julia Lotesoriere; Stefano Prudenza; Luca Magagnin; Giacomo Langfelder; Nicolò Buffi; Paolo Casale; Laura Capelli
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Hope for Ostomates: A Carbon and Zeolite Impregnated Polyester Fabric Inhibits Urine Odor in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Experimental Study.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Linda M Thiel; Desiree L Miller; Lorenzo Tidu; Paolo Sardella; Patricia Camp; Matteo Luigi Zanoni; Paolo Vota; Cinzia Mazzieri; Giovanni Toia; Vittorio Fasulo; Pierpaolo Avolio; Alessio Benetti; Niccolò Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Guazzoni; Fabio Grizzi; Brian Stork
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.