Literature DB >> 3359582

A fourth criterion for transient entrainment: the electrogram equivalent of progressive fusion.

R W Henthorn1, K Okumura, B Olshansky, V J Plumb, P G Hess, A L Waldo.   

Abstract

Prior data pertaining to transient entrainment and associated phenomena have been best explained by pacing capture of a reentrant circuit. On this basis, we hypothesized that rapid pacing from a single site of two different constant pacing rates could constantly capture an appropriately selected bipolar electrogram recording site from one direction with a constant stimulus-to-electrogram interval during pacing at one rate, yet be constantly captured from another direction with a different constant stimulus-to-electrogram interval when pacing at a different constant pacing rate. To test this hypothesis, we studied a group of patients, each with a representative tachycardia (ventricular tachycardia, circus-movement tachycardia involving an atrioventricular bypass pathway, atrial tachycardia, and atrial flutter). For each tachycardia, pacing was performed from a single site for at least two different constant rates faster than the spontaneous rate of the tachycardia. We observed in these patients that a local bipolar recording site was constantly captured from different directions at two different pacing rates without interrupting the tachycardia at pacing termination. The evidence that the same site was captured from a different direction at two different pacing rates was supported by demonstrating a change in conduction time to that site associated with a change in the bipolar electrogram morphology at that site when comparing pacing at each rate. The mean conduction time (stimulus-to-recording site electrogram interval) was 319 +/- 69 msec while pacing at a mean cycle length of 265 +/- 50 msec, yet only 81 +/- 38 msec while pacing at a second mean cycle length of 233 +/- 51 msec, a mean change in conduction time of 238 +/- 56 msec. Remarkably, the faster pacing rate resulted in a shorter conduction time. The fact that the same electrode recording site was activated from different directions without interruption of the spontaneous tachycardia at pacing termination is difficult to explain on any mechanistic basis other than reentry. Also, these changes in conduction time and electrogram morphology occurred in parallel with the demonstration of progressive fusion beats on the electrocardiogram, the latter being an established criterion for transient entrainment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3359582     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.77.5.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

1.  Apparent bidirectional conduction block following radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  R F Quintos; T Barakat; A Mecca; B Olshansky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Usefulness of entrainment mapping using the activation sequence of the last captured excitation in complex dual-loop atrial tachycardia.

Authors:  Akira Fujiki; Ryozo Yoshioka; Masao Sakabe
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2014-11-06

3.  Could predicted post-pacing interval from theoretical mathematical formula replace the observed post-pacing interval in clinical practice?

Authors:  Chin-Yu Lin; Li-Wei Lo; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Early versus late atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Loutrianakis; Tawfik Barakat; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  HRS policy statement: clinical cardiac electrophysiology fellowship curriculum: update 2011.

Authors:  Mark S Link; Derek V Exner; Mark Anderson; Michael Ackerman; Amin Al-Ahmad; Bradley P Knight; Steven M Markowitz; Elizabeth S Kaufman; David Haines; Samuel J Asirvatham; David J Callans; J Paul Mounsey; Frank Bogun; Sanjiv M Narayan; Andrew D Krahn; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; John D Fisher; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Incidence and predictive factors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  Valérie Laurent; Laurent Fauchier; Bertrand Pierre; Caroline Grimard; Dominique Babuty
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Resetting and entrainment of reentrant arrhythmias: part I: concepts, recognition, and protocol for evaluation: surface ECG versus intracardiac recordings.

Authors:  Jesús Almendral; Raúl Caulier-Cisterna; José Luis Rojo-Álvarez
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.976

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.