Literature DB >> 33595710

Large-scale ICU data sharing for global collaboration: the first 1633 critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Dutch Data Warehouse.

Lucas M Fleuren1, Daan P de Bruin2, Michele Tonutti2, Robbert C A Lalisang2, Paul W G Elbers3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33595710      PMCID: PMC7887418          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06361-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to stretch intensive care unit (ICU) capacity to its limits worldwide and optimizing management of critically ill COVID-19 patients remains urgently needed [1]. Fortunately, most ICUs deploy Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to routinely capture high-frequency clinical information. These data reflect the clinical practice variation resulting from the novelty of COVID-19 as well as the variation in patient characteristics and outcomes between centers [2, 3]. Therefore, these data may be employed to better understand the clinical course of COVID-19 and individualize treatment. Given these considerations, a large-scale ICU data sharing collaboration in The Netherlands was initiated for the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the Dutch Data Warehouse (DDW, Fig. 1). While the database is growing, at this point, the DDW combines pseudonymized EHR data from 23 intensive care units covering the entire ICU admission of all adult COVID-19 patients treated in these ICUs. Collected data include data from monitoring and life support devices, demographics, medication, fluid balance, comorbidities, laboratory results, and outcomes. All parameters were manually reviewed by intensive care professionals and mapped to a common ontology. A software data pipeline converted units, filtered data entry errors, and calculated derived clinical parameters. Data validation was a continuous process including hospital data verification and visual inspection of distribution plots.
Fig. 1

Overview of the Dutch Data Warehouse

Overview of the Dutch Data Warehouse Detailed patient characteristics and technical information on the DDW are available in the online supplementary material (OSM). So far, 1633 patients treated between March and October 2020 have been processed and added to the DDW, now containing over 120 million data points mapped to a common ontology of 875 parameter names. Median age was 65 years (IQR 56–72) and 27.8% of patients were female. Mortality in the ICU was 25.4% overall, and 29.7% for mechanically ventilated patients. Hospital mortality was 33.1% and 36% for mechanically ventilated patients (available for 14/23 hospitals). Diabetes (22.9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 97%), and any immunodeficiency (9%) were the most common comorbidities. 78% of patients were intubated during their ICU stay, with 76.4% of these patients intubated within 10 hours after ICU admission. Patients were mechanically ventilated for a median of 12.4 days (IQR 6.4–22.6 days), with a reintubation rate of 13.4% among extubated patients. About half (53.9%) of patients were proned at least once and 72% of patients were proned within 48 h. The readmission rate was 4.7%. Preliminary analyses of respiratory characteristics in the first 24 h of invasive mechanical ventilation show a median P/F ratio of 164 mmHg (IQR 133–205). Repiratory system compliance after intubation was low 36 ml/cmH2O (IQR 29–45) with 30.8% of patients showing further drops by day 7. Initial positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 14 cmH2O (IQR 10–15) and tidal volumes were 6.6 ml/kg (IQR 6.2–7.1). Thus, the general clinical picture and treatment is reminiscent of classic acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The DDW is among the largest highly granular COVID-19 EHR datasets with full admission data to date. Coverage of entire ICU admissions can enable analyses known from general large ICU data sets such as MIMIC [4] and AmsterdamUMCdb [5]. In addition, the DDW paves the way for nationwide large-scale ICU data sharing beyond COVID-19. Importantly, given the ongoing pandemic, the intensive care and data science community are encouraged to utilize these data to optimize clinical care. Therefore, the DDW is available for global collaboration through https://www.icudata.nl. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29148 KB)
  4 in total

1.  Predictors for extubation failure in COVID-19 patients using a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Lucas M Fleuren; Tariq A Dam; Michele Tonutti; Daan P de Bruin; Robbert C A Lalisang; Diederik Gommers; Olaf L Cremer; Rob J Bosman; Sander Rigter; Evert-Jan Wils; Tim Frenzel; Dave A Dongelmans; Remko de Jong; Marco Peters; Marlijn J A Kamps; Dharmanand Ramnarain; Ralph Nowitzky; Fleur G C A Nooteboom; Wouter de Ruijter; Louise C Urlings-Strop; Ellen G M Smit; D Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper; Tom Dormans; Cornelis P C de Jager; Stefaan H A Hendriks; Sefanja Achterberg; Evelien Oostdijk; Auke C Reidinga; Barbara Festen-Spanjer; Gert B Brunnekreef; Alexander D Cornet; Walter van den Tempel; Age D Boelens; Peter Koetsier; Judith Lens; Harald J Faber; A Karakus; Robert Entjes; Paul de Jong; Thijs C D Rettig; Sesmu Arbous; Sebastiaan J J Vonk; Mattia Fornasa; Tomas Machado; Taco Houwert; Hidde Hovenkamp; Roberto Noorduijn Londono; Davide Quintarelli; Martijn G Scholtemeijer; Aletta A de Beer; Giovanni Cinà; Adam Kantorik; Tom de Ruijter; Willem E Herter; Martijn Beudel; Armand R J Girbes; Mark Hoogendoorn; Patrick J Thoral; Paul W G Elbers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Differences and Similarities Among COVID-19 Patients Treated in Seven ICUs in Three Countries Within One Region: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dieter Mesotten; Daniek A M Meijs; Bas C T van Bussel; Björn Stessel; Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper; Anisa Hana; Clarissa I E Scheeren; Ulrich Strauch; Marcel C G van de Poll; Chahinda Ghossein-Doha; Wolfgang F F A Buhre; Johannes Bickenbach; Margot Vander Laenen; Gernot Marx; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 9.296

3.  Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Gravesteijn; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hester F Lingsma
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.532

4.  Risk factors for adverse outcomes during mechanical ventilation of 1152 COVID-19 patients: a multicenter machine learning study with highly granular data from the Dutch Data Warehouse.

Authors:  Lucas M Fleuren; Michele Tonutti; Daan P de Bruin; Robbert C A Lalisang; Tariq A Dam; Diederik Gommers; Olaf L Cremer; Rob J Bosman; Sebastiaan J J Vonk; Mattia Fornasa; Tomas Machado; Nardo J M van der Meer; Sander Rigter; Evert-Jan Wils; Tim Frenzel; Dave A Dongelmans; Remko de Jong; Marco Peters; Marlijn J A Kamps; Dharmanand Ramnarain; Ralph Nowitzky; Fleur G C A Nooteboom; Wouter de Ruijter; Louise C Urlings-Strop; Ellen G M Smit; D Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper; Tom Dormans; Cornelis P C de Jager; Stefaan H A Hendriks; Evelien Oostdijk; Auke C Reidinga; Barbara Festen-Spanjer; Gert Brunnekreef; Alexander D Cornet; Walter van den Tempel; Age D Boelens; Peter Koetsier; Judith Lens; Sefanja Achterberg; Harald J Faber; A Karakus; Menno Beukema; Robert Entjes; Paul de Jong; Taco Houwert; Hidde Hovenkamp; Roberto Noorduijn Londono; Davide Quintarelli; Martijn G Scholtemeijer; Aletta A de Beer; Giovanni Cinà; Martijn Beudel; Nicolet F de Keizer; Mark Hoogendoorn; Armand R J Girbes; Willem E Herter; Paul W G Elbers; Patrick J Thoral
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-06-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.