David D Berg1, Pardeep S Jhund2, Kieran F Docherty2, Sabina A Murphy1, Subodh Verma3, Silvio E Inzucchi4, Lars Køber5, Mikhail N Kosiborod6, Anna Maria Langkilde7, Felipe A Martinez8, Olof Bengtsson7, Piotr Ponikowski9, Mikaela Sjöstrand7, Scott D Solomon10, John J V McMurray2, Marc S Sabatine1. 1. TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 3. Division of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 4. Section of Endocrinology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri. 7. Late Stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism BioPharmaceuticals Research and Development, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden. 8. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina. 9. Center for Heart Diseases, University Hospital, Wrocław Medical University, Poland. 10. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, clinical inertia often underlies deferred initiation of effective therapies. Objective: To examine timing of onset of clinical benefit with dapagliflozin and magnitude as a function of proximity to prior HF hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a completed multinational trial. The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 4744). From February 2017 to August 2018, the study enrolled patients in New York Heart Association classes II through IV and with left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less; the median (range) follow-up time was 18.2 (0-27.8) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the primary efficacy outcome with dapagliflozin vs placebo by time following randomization. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were assessed according to the timing of the most recent HF hospitalization prior to trial enrollment. Exposures: None. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF. Results: A total of 4744 patients were included (1109 women [23.4%]; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [10.9] years). The reduction in the primary outcome with dapagliflozin was rapidly apparent, with a sustained statistically significant benefit by 28 days after randomization (HR at 28 days, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.94]; P = .03). A total of 2251 patients (47.4%) had been previously hospitalized for HF, and 1301 (27.4%) had been hospitalized within 12 months prior to enrollment. Among patients treated with placebo, there was a stepwise gradient of risk for the primary outcome according to timing of most recent HF hospitalization, with 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of 21.1%, 25.3%, and 33.8% (adjusted P = .003) for patients with a prior HF hospitalization never, more than 12 months ago, and 12 or fewer months ago, respectively. Across these subgroups, dapagliflozin reduced the relative risk of the primary outcome by 16% (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]), 27% (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.54-0.99]), and 36% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.80]), respectively (P = .07 for trend). Accordingly, patients with a more recent HF hospitalization tended to experience greater absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin at 2 years: 2.1% (95% CI, -1.9% to 6.1%), 4.1% (95% CI, -3.6% to 11.7%), and 9.9% (95% CI, 3.3%-16.5%), respectively (P = .05 for trend). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, treatment with dapagliflozin was associated with rapid reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening HF, with a sustained statistically significant benefit emerging very early after randomization. Patients with a more recent HF hospitalization were at particularly high risk and experienced greater relative and absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03036124.
Importance: Dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, clinical inertia often underlies deferred initiation of effective therapies. Objective: To examine timing of onset of clinical benefit with dapagliflozin and magnitude as a function of proximity to prior HF hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a completed multinational trial. The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 4744). From February 2017 to August 2018, the study enrolled patients in New York Heart Association classes II through IV and with left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less; the median (range) follow-up time was 18.2 (0-27.8) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the primary efficacy outcome with dapagliflozin vs placebo by time following randomization. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were assessed according to the timing of the most recent HF hospitalization prior to trial enrollment. Exposures: None. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF. Results: A total of 4744 patients were included (1109 women [23.4%]; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [10.9] years). The reduction in the primary outcome with dapagliflozin was rapidly apparent, with a sustained statistically significant benefit by 28 days after randomization (HR at 28 days, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.94]; P = .03). A total of 2251 patients (47.4%) had been previously hospitalized for HF, and 1301 (27.4%) had been hospitalized within 12 months prior to enrollment. Among patients treated with placebo, there was a stepwise gradient of risk for the primary outcome according to timing of most recent HF hospitalization, with 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of 21.1%, 25.3%, and 33.8% (adjusted P = .003) for patients with a prior HF hospitalization never, more than 12 months ago, and 12 or fewer months ago, respectively. Across these subgroups, dapagliflozin reduced the relative risk of the primary outcome by 16% (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]), 27% (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.54-0.99]), and 36% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.80]), respectively (P = .07 for trend). Accordingly, patients with a more recent HF hospitalization tended to experience greater absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin at 2 years: 2.1% (95% CI, -1.9% to 6.1%), 4.1% (95% CI, -3.6% to 11.7%), and 9.9% (95% CI, 3.3%-16.5%), respectively (P = .05 for trend). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, treatment with dapagliflozin was associated with rapid reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening HF, with a sustained statistically significant benefit emerging very early after randomization. Patients with a more recent HF hospitalization were at particularly high risk and experienced greater relative and absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03036124.
Authors: Muthiah Vaduganathan; Brian L Claggett; Pardeep Jhund; Rudolf A de Boer; Adrian F Hernandez; Silvio E Inzucchi; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Carolyn S P Lam; Felipe Martinez; Sanjiv J Shah; Akshay S Desai; Sheila M Hegde; Daniel Lindholm; Magnus Petersson; Anna Maria Langkilde; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 30.154
Authors: Amr Abdin; Johann Bauersachs; Norbert Frey; Ingrid Kindermann; Andreas Link; Nikolaus Marx; Mitja Lainscak; Jonathan Slawik; Christian Werner; Jan Wintrich; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Andrei C Sposito; Ikaro Breder; Alexandre A S Soares; Sheila T Kimura-Medorima; Daniel B Munhoz; Riobaldo M R Cintra; Isabella Bonilha; Daniela C Oliveira; Jessica Cunha Breder; Pamela Cavalcante; Camila Moreira; Filipe A Moura; Jose Carlos de Lima-Junior; Helison R P do Carmo; Joaquim Barreto; Wilson Nadruz; Luiz Sergio F Carvalho; Thiago Quinaglia Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Moritz J Hundertmark; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Ruth Coleman; Jyothis T George; Rolf Grempler; Rury R Holman; Hanan Lamlum; Jisoo Lee; Joanne E Milton; Heiko G Niessen; Oliver Rider; Christopher T Rodgers; Ladislav Valkovič; Eleanor Wicks; Masliza Mahmod; Stefan Neubauer Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-05-06
Authors: Amr Abdin; Stefan D Anker; Javed Butler; Andrew J Stewart Coats; Ingrid Kindermann; Mitja Lainscak; Lars H Lund; Marco Metra; Wilfried Mullens; Giuseppe Rosano; Jonathan Slawik; Jan Wintrich; Michael Böhm Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-10-16
Authors: Marc Evans; Angharad R Morgan; Zaheer Yousef; Gethin Ellis; Umesh Dashora; Dipesh C Patel; Pam Brown; Wasim Hanif; Johnathan N Townend; Naresh Kanumilli; Jim Moore; John P H Wilding; Stephen C Bain Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 9.546