Literature DB >> 33595244

Preterm Birth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in a Large Hospital System in the United States.

Rachel Wood1, Colleen Sinnott, Ilona Goldfarb, Mark Clapp, Thomas McElrath, Sarah Little.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33595244      PMCID: PMC7884087          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Denmark and Ireland have reported drastic reductions in the rate of preterm birth during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic,[1,2] though this was not found in the United Kingdom.[3] These findings have led to widespread speculation, both in the academic and lay press, that the acts of social isolation and quarantine may lead to a reduction in the incidence of preterm birth.[1-4] We investigated whether our hospital system in the United States had any change in the preterm delivery rate during the peak COVID-19 pandemic era when compared with the pre–COVID-19 era.

METHODS

We compared singleton live births at 20 weeks of gestation or greater during the peak COVID-19 pandemic era (April through July of 2020, during the statewide recommended “stay-at-home” order in Massachusetts) with those in a pre–COVID-19 era (April through July 2019). We included four hospitals within our hospital system, all with level 3 or 4 neonatal intensive care units (two large academic teaching hospitals and two community-based hospitals), excluding women who were already at 37 weeks of gestation or greater at the start of the time period. Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Race and ethnicity were self-reported in electronic medical record patient demographics. We looked at the overall gestational age distribution during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic era and the pre–COVID-19 era, as well as the rate of preterm birth using various thresholds. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 9,356 deliveries: 4,644 in the pre–COVID-19 pandemic era and 4,712 during the peak COVID-19 pandemic era. The distribution of gestational ages was identical in the two eras (median gestational age at delivery 39 2/7 weeks in both). There was no difference in the overall rate of preterm birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation (7.4% vs 7.9%; P=.4), nor any differences in the rate of delivery at less than 34, less than 32, or less than 28 weeks. There was no difference in spontaneous compared with iatrogenic preterm birth (56.1% of preterm deliveries in 2019 were spontaneous vs 54.6% in 2020; P=.7). In a post hoc power calculation, we had 80% power to detect a 20% reduction in the overall rate of preterm birth. In the peak COVID-19 pandemic era, 158 (3.4%) deliveries were to women who had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction test at any time. Infection was more common in women who were Black (6.7% vs 3.0%; P<.01), Hispanic (11.3% vs 1.8%; P<.01), and publicly insured (10.7% vs 1.4%; P<.01); however, there were no reductions in preterm birth in any demographic subgroup. Results were similar when excluding the 158 women with polymerase chain reaction test–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.

DISCUSSION

We report no reduction in the preterm birth rate at our hospital system in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. We had adequate power to detect up to a 20% reduction in preterm birth, far less than the 70–90% reduction seen in Denmark and Ireland.[1,2] There were no differences in transfer or referral patterns for preterm delivery in the two time periods, with more than 90% of transfers occurring from within our hospital system in both. There were no differences in preterm birth type (spontaneous vs iatrogenic), indicating that changes in prenatal care delivery during the pandemic did not alter iatrogenic preterm birth rates. The rate of preterm birth and SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States and in our hospital system are significantly higher than the rates in the previous international studies, which may in part account for the disparate findings. Our cohort showed Black, Hispanic, and publicly insured women to have higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection, consistent with previous findings[5]; however, we did not find any reduction in preterm birth overall or in any demographic groups. Our study findings do not support the theory that quarantine or health care delivery changes during the COVID-19 pandemic decrease rates of preterm birth (Table 1).
Table 1.

Preterm Birth Before the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic (April–July 2019) and During the Peak of the Pandemic (April–July 2020)

Preterm Birth Before the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic (April–July 2019) and During the Peak of the Pandemic (April–July 2020)
  12 in total

Review 1.  The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Hawco; Daniel L Rolnik; Andrea Woolner; Natalie J Cameron; Victoria Wyness; Ben W Mol; Mairead Black
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.831

2.  COVID-19 pandemic and population-level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.544

3.  The Convergence of COVID-19 and Systemic Racism: An Evaluation of Current Evidence, Health System Changes, and Solutions Grounded in Reproductive Justice.

Authors:  Abby J Britt; Nicole S Carlson; Naima T Joseph; Alexis Dunn Amore
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta-analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021).

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.544

5.  Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Preterm Births, Low Birthweights and Stillbirths: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Charles Garabedian; Ninon Dupuis; Christophe Vayssière; Laurence Bussières; Yves Ville; Benoît Renaudin; Louise Dugave; Norbert Winer; Nathalie Banaszkiewicz; Patrick Rozenberg; Manon Defrance; Marie-Laure Legris; Thibaud Quibel; Philippe Deruelle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Changes in rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in the United States, 2019-2020.

Authors:  Regina M Simeone; Karrie F Downing; Bailey Wallace; Romeo R Galang; Carla L DeSisto; Van T Tong; Lauren B Zapata; Jean Y Ko; Sascha R Ellington
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Associations of COVID-19 lockdown with gestational length and preterm birth in China.

Authors:  Moran Dong; Rui Qian; Jiaqi Wang; Jingjie Fan; Yufeng Ye; He Zhou; Brian Win; Eve Reid; Suijin Zheng; Yanyun Lv; Yudong Pu; Hanwei Chen; Juan Jin; Qingmei Lin; Xiaoyang Luo; Guimin Chen; Yumeng Chen; Zhongrong He; Guanhao He; Shouzhen Cheng; Jianxiong Hu; Jianpeng Xiao; Wenjun Ma; Tao Liu; Xiaozhong Wen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  COVID-19 Pandemic: Different Associative Relationships of City Lockdown With Preterm Births in Three Cities - An Ecological Study.

Authors:  Po-Yin Cheung; Belal Alshaikh; Chuanzhong Yang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Turkey.

Authors:  Siddika Songül Yalçin; Perran Boran; Başak Tezel; Tuba Esra Şahlar; Pınar Özdemir; Bekir Keskinkiliç; Fatih Kara
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Neighborhood deprivation and preterm delivery during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Stephanie A Fisher; Allie Sakowicz; Cynthia Barnard; Seth Kidder; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.