Literature DB >> 33594185

Nonsurgical treatment outcomes for surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive cohort study.

Chi Heon Kim1,2, Yunhee Choi3, Chun Kee Chung4,5,6, Ki-Jeong Kim1,7, Dong Ah Shin8,9, Youn-Kwan Park10,11, Woo-Keun Kwon10,11, Seung Heon Yang1,2, Chang Hyun Lee1,2,7, Sung Bae Park1,12, Eun Sang Kim13, Hyunsook Hong3, Yongeun Cho9,14.   

Abstract

Physicians often encounter surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who request non-surgical management even though surgery is recommended. However, second opinions may differ among doctors. Therefore, a prospective comprehensive cohort study (CCS) was designed to assess outcomes of nonsurgical treatment for surgical candidates who were recommended to undergo surgery for LDH but requested a second opinion. The CCS includes both randomized and observational cohorts, comprising a nonsurgery cohort and surgery cohort, in a parallel fashion. Crossover between the nonsurgery and surgery cohorts was allowed at any time. The present study was an as-treated interim analysis of 128 cases (nonsurgery cohort, n = 71; surgery cohort, n = 57). Patient-reported outcomes included visual analogue scores for the back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), the Oswestry Disability Index, the EuroQol 5-Dimension instrument, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. At baseline, age and SF-36 physical function were significantly lower in the surgery cohort than in the nonsurgery cohort (p < 0.05). All adjusted outcomes significantly improved after both nonsurgical and surgical treatment (p < 0.05). The nonsurgery cohort showed less improvement of VAS-B and VAS-L scores at 1 month (p < 0.01), but no difference between cohorts was observed thereafter for 24 months (p > 0.01). Nonsurgical management may be a negotiable option even for surgical candidates in the shared decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33594185      PMCID: PMC7887235          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83471-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  43 in total

Review 1.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica.

Authors:  G K Lutz; M E Butzlaff; S J Atlas; R B Keller; D E Singer; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Randomized and non-randomized patients in clinical trials: experiences with comprehensive cohort studies.

Authors:  C Schmoor; M Olschewski; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Robert B Keller; Yen A Wu; Richard A Deyo; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Quantity of Disc Removal and Radiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

Authors:  Ji Han Heo; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Yunhee Choi; Young-Geun Seo; Dong Hoi Kim; Sung Bae Park; Jung Hyeon Moon; Won Heo; Jong-Myung Jung
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Surgical Outcome of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Disk Herniation.

Authors:  Chi H Kim; Chun K Chung; Ji W Woo
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part II. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo; R B Keller; A M Chapin; D L Patrick; J M Long; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Maurits van Tulder; Mark Arts; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne Verhagen; Bart Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does Preservation of Ligamentum Flavum in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Discectomy Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Authors:  Urim Lee; Chi Heon Kim; Calvin C Kuo; Yunhee Choi; Sung Bae Park; Seung Heon Yang; Chang-Hyun Lee; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-03-31
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenxian Wang; Feibing Long; Xinshun Wu; Shanhuan Li; Ji Lin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Direct medical costs after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: A nationwide matched cohort study with a 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Yunhee Choi; Juhee Lee; Seung Heon Yang; Chang Hyun Lee; Sung Bae Park; Kyoung-Tae Kim; John M Rhee; Moon Soo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Treatment Effect of CT-Guided Periradicular Injections in Context of Different Contrast Agent Distribution Patterns.

Authors:  Vera Reuschel; Cordula Scherlach; Christian Pfeifle; Matthias Krause; Manuel Florian Struck; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Stefan Schob
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.