Literature DB >> 33594183

Delayed mortality, resistance and the sweet spot, as the good, the bad and the ugly in phosphine use.

Evagelia Lampiri1,2, Paraskevi Agrafioti3, Christos G Athanassiou1,2.   

Abstract

Phosphine is the most commonly used gas for fumigation for durable commodities globally, but there is still inadequate information regarding its efficacy in conjunction with proper concentration monitoring. In a series of bioassays, insect mortality after specific exposure intervals to phosphine in selected species was examined, as well as the appearance of the so called "sweet spot". The species that were tested were: Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) with populations that had different levels of phosphine resistance. Evaluation was conducted by using the Phosphine Tolerance Test (PTT), with exposure of the adult stage for 15, 30, 60, 90, 150 and 300 min at 3000 ppm. At the end of these intervals (separate bioassays for each time interval), the insects were transferred to Petri dishes, in which recovery was recorded at different time intervals (2 h, 1, 2 and 7 days). The majority of susceptible populations of all species were instantly immobilized even in the shortest exposure period (15 min), in contrast with resistant populations that were active even after 300 min. After exposure to phosphine, populations and exposure time affected mortality of susceptible populations, whereas resistant populations recovered regardless of species and exposure time. Additional bioassays at the concentrations of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 ppm for 1, 3, 5, 20, 30 and 40 h showed the presence of the "sweet spot", i.e., decrease of mortality with the increase of concentration. In fact, for most of the tested species, the "sweet spot" appeared in 1000 and 2000 ppm at a 5-h exposure time, regardless of the level of resistance to phosphine. This observation is particularly important both in terms of the assessment of resistance and in the context of non-linear recovery at elevated concentrations, indicating the occurrence of strong hormetic reversals in phosphine efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33594183      PMCID: PMC7887275          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83463-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Effects of time and concentration on mortality of phosphine-resistant Sitophilus oryzae (L) fumigated with phosphine.

Authors:  Gregory J Daglish; Patrick J Collins; Hervoika Pavic; Rosemary A Kopittke
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 2.  Resistance to the Fumigant Phosphine and Its Management in Insect Pests of Stored Products: A Global Perspective.

Authors:  Manoj K Nayak; Gregory J Daglish; Thomas W Phillips; Paul R Ebert
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Phosphine Resistance in North American Field Populations of the Lesser Grain Borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae).

Authors:  E Afful; Brent Elliott; Manoj K Nayak; Thomas W Phillips
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Phosphine Resistance in Adult and Immature Life Stages of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Populations in California.

Authors:  S G Gautam; G P Opit; E Hosoda
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Effects of short exposures to spinosad-treated wheat or maize on four stored-grain insects.

Authors:  Christos G Athanassiou; Frank H Arthur; James E Throne
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Phosphine resistance in Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica from stored wheat in Oklahoma.

Authors:  G P Opit; T W Phillips; M J Aikins; M M Hasan
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Effect of exposure period on degree of dominance of phosphine resistance in adults of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Authors:  Gregory J Daglish
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  Diagnostic molecular markers for phosphine resistance in U.S. populations of Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica.

Authors:  Zhaorigetu Chen; David Schlipalius; George Opit; Bhadriraju Subramanyam; Thomas W Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of Wireless Phosphine Sensors for Monitoring Fumigation Gas in Wheat Stored in Farm Bins.

Authors:  Daniel Brabec; James Campbell; Frank Arthur; Mark Casada; Dennis Tilley; Sotiris Bantas
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Using a Lethality Index to Assess Susceptibility of Tribolium confusum and Oryzaephilus surinamensis to Insecticides.

Authors:  Paraskevi Agrafioti; Christos G Athanassiou; Thomas N Vassilakos; George Vlontzos; Frank H Arthur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chemical vs. Enzymatic Refining to Produce Peanut Oil for Edible Use or to Obtain a Sustainable and Cost-Effective Protector for Stored Grains against Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Authors:  Monica Macaluso; Priscilla Farina; Linda Rossi; Alessandro Bianchi; Francesca Venturi; Rodrigo Daniel Chiriboga Ortega; Stefano Bedini; Barbara Conti; Luca Guidi; Angela Zinnai
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-24

2.  Decoyinine Induced Resistance in Rice against Small Brown Planthopper Laodelphax striatellus.

Authors:  Amir Zaman Shah; Chao Ma; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qiuxin Zhang; Gang Xu; Guoqing Yang
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.769

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.