Literature DB >> 33593844

In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Tebipenem (TBP), an Orally Active Carbapenem, against Biothreat Pathogens.

Nicholas P Clayton1, Akash Jain2, Stephanie A Halasohoris3, Lisa M Pysz3, Sanae Lembirik3, Steven D Zumbrun3, Christopher D Kane3, Michael J Hackett4, Denise Pfefferle4, M Autumn Smiley4, Michael S Anderson4, Henry Heine5, Gabriel T Meister4, Michael J Pucci2.   

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis, causative pathogens for anthrax and plague, respectively, along with Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei are potential bioterrorism threats. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBP HBr, formerly SPR994), is an orally available prodrug of tebipenem, a carbapenem with activity versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens, including quinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. We evaluated the in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of tebipenem against biothreat pathogens. Tebipenem was active in vitro against 30-strain diversity sets of B. anthracis, Y. pestis, B. mallei, and B. pseudomallei with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 0.001 - 0.008 μg/ml for B. anthracis, ≤0.0005 - 0.03 μg/ml for Y. pestis, 0.25 - 1 μg/ml for B. mallei, and 1 - 4 μg/ml for B. pseudomallei In a B. anthracis murine model, all control animals died within 52 h post challenge. The survival rates in the groups treated with tebipenem were 75% and 73% when dosed at 12 h and 24 h post challenge, respectively. The survival rates in the positive control groups treated with ciprofloxacin were 75% and when dosed 12 h and 25% when dosed 24 h post challenge, respectively. Survival rates were significantly (p=0.0009) greater in tebipenem groups treated at 12 h and 24 h post challenge and in the ciprofloxacin group 12 h post-challenge vs. the vehicle-control group. For Y. pestis, survival rates for all animals in the tebipenem and ciprofloxacin groups were significantly (p<0.0001) greater than the vehicle-control group. These results support further development of tebipenem for treating biothreat pathogens.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593844      PMCID: PMC8092902          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02385-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  35 in total

1.  In vitro activity of tebipenem against Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Chakkraphong Seenama; Surapee Tiengrim; Visanu Thamlikitkul
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Recent Advances in Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei Research.

Authors:  Christopher L Hatcher; Laura A Muruato; Alfredo G Torres
Journal:  Curr Trop Med Rep       Date:  2015-06

3.  Bioterrorism, Glanders and melioidosis.

Authors:  A C Cheng; D Ab Dance; B J Currie
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2005-03

4.  In Vitro Activity of Tebipenem (SPR859) against Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Authors:  Evelyne Lacasse; Eric Brouillette; Audrey Larose; Thomas R Parr; Aileen Rubio; François Malouin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of Combination Drug Therapy for Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Inhalation Anthrax in a Murine Model.

Authors:  H S Heine; S V Shadomy; A E Boyer; L Chuvala; R Riggins; A Kesterson; J Myrick; J Craig; M G Candela; J R Barr; K Hendricks; W A Bower; H Walke; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antimicrobial Treatment for Systemic Anthrax: Analysis of Cases from 1945 to 2014 Identified Through a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Satish K Pillai; Eileen Huang; Julie T Guarnizo; Jamechia D Hoyle; Stefan Katharios-Lanwermeyer; Theresa K Turski; William A Bower; Katherine A Hendricks; Dana Meaney-Delman
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2015-12-01

7.  Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents.

Authors:  Lisa D Rotz; Ali S Khan; Scott R Lillibridge; Stephen M Ostroff; James M Hughes
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  Tebipenem, the first oral carbapenem antibiotic.

Authors:  Akash Jain; Luke Utley; Thomas R Parr; Thomas Zabawa; Michael J Pucci
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Development of an inhalational Bacillus anthracis exposure therapeutic model in cynomolgus macaques.

Authors:  Lisa N Henning; Jason E Comer; Gregory V Stark; Bryan D Ray; Kevin P Tordoff; Katherine A B Knostman; Gabriel T Meister
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-09-05

10.  Rapid Detection of Genetic Engineering, Structural Variation, and Antimicrobial Resistance Markers in Bacterial Biothreat Pathogens by Nanopore Sequencing.

Authors:  Amy S Gargis; Blake Cherney; Andrew B Conley; Heather P McLaughlin; David Sue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Tebipenem following Oral Administration of Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide to Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Mark H Gotfried; Vipul Gupta; Amanda Ek; Praveen Srivastava; Angela Talley; Jon Bruss
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  The Class A β-Lactamase Produced by Burkholderia Species Compromises the Potency of Tebipenem against a Panel of Isolates from the United States.

Authors:  Scott A Becka; Elise T Zeiser; John J LiPuma; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.