| Literature DB >> 33593830 |
George Griffin1, Martin Hewison2, Julian Hopkin3, Rose Anne Kenny4, Richard Quinton5, Jonathan Rhodes6, Sreedhar Subramanian7, David Thickett2.
Abstract
The value of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment or prevention of various conditions is often viewed with scepticism as a result of contradictory results of randomised trials. It is now becoming apparent that there is a pattern to these inconsistencies. A recent large trial has shown that high-dose intermittent bolus vitamin D therapy is ineffective at preventing rickets - the condition that is most unequivocally caused by vitamin D deficiency. There is a plausible biological explanation since high-dose bolus replacement induces long-term expression of the catabolic enzyme 24-hydroxylase and fibroblast growth factor 23, both of which have vitamin D inactivating effects. Meta-analyses of vitamin D supplementation in prevention of acute respiratory infection and trials in tuberculosis and other conditions also support efficacy of low dose daily maintenance rather than intermittent bolus dosing. This is particularly relevant during the current COVID-19 pandemic given the well-documented associations between COVID-19 risk and vitamin D deficiency. We would urge that clinicians take note of these findings and give strong support to widespread use of daily vitamin D supplementation. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; dosing; efficacy; maintenance; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33593830 PMCID: PMC8002781 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) ISSN: 1470-2118 Impact factor: 2.659