| Literature DB >> 33592833 |
Youhua Liu1,2, Hong Guo1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: To investigate the status quo of empowerment ability of primary caregivers in post-stroke patients with disability and its influencing factors.A cross-sectional design and a convenience sample were used. Participants (N = 189) from 3 hospital in Beijing were recruited from October 2018 to June 2019. The following measurement tools were used in this study: Barthel index, Main Caregiver Empowerment Measurement, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire and Social Support Rating Scale. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was used to statistically infer the influencing factors of empowerment ability of primary caregivers.The total score of main caregivers' empowerment measurement among the participants was 161.03 ± 14.678, the median (interquartile range) score was 162.00 (150.00-171.50). The average scores of each dimension ranged from high to low: relationship with the person being cared for, goodwill care, expectation for care outcomes, subjectivity of caregiver, faith in care, understanding of care role, knowledge and skills of care, scruples about the surroundings, personal resources. The single factor analysis showed that the patient's payment method for medical expenses, whether the patient accompanied by other chronic diseases and the gender of the caregiver had an effect on the empowerment ability of primary caregivers, and the positive coping style, negative coping style, self-efficacy and subjective support of primary caregivers were positively correlated with their empowerment ability (P < .05). Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis showed that the type of payment for treatment of patients (b = 7.449, P < .01), and gender of caregivers (b = 5.039, P < .05), subjective support of caregivers (b = 0.439, P < .05), positive coping style of caregivers (b = 0.585, P < .01), self-efficacy of caregivers (b = 6.456, P < .01) were the main influencing factors of empowerment ability of primary caregivers.The empowerment ability of the primary caregivers of post-stroke patients with disability in China is at the upper middle level. However, there are more scruples about the surrounding and less personal resources, which deserve attention. Furthermore, the identification of the factors related to empowerment lays a foundation for clinical nursing practitioners to further develop targeted interventions on empowerment of caregivers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33592833 PMCID: PMC7870185 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Different dimensions of the empowerment of primary caregivers (N = 189).
| Dimension | Number of items | Mean ± SD |
| Personal resources | 7 | 2.716 ± 0.639 |
| Caregiver subjectivity | 6 | 3.308 ± 0.488 |
| Care beliefs | 5 | 3.198 ± 0.595 |
| Care knowledge and skills | 3 | 2.820 ± 0.824 |
| Scruples about the surroundings | 6 | 2.932 ± 0.773 |
| Relationship with the person being cared for | 6 | 3.685 ± 0.409 |
| Goodwill care | 6 | 3.554 ± 0.456 |
| Understanding of care role | 6 | 3.065 ± 0.552 |
| Expectation for care outcomes | 6 | 3.495 ± 0.652 |
Comparison of the empowerment of primary caregivers (N = 189).
| Characteristics | n | mean ± SD/M (P25, P75) | F/t/Z | |
| Patients | ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 107 | 161.51 ± 14.518 | –0.521 | .603 |
| Female | 82 | 160.39 ± 14.949 | ||
| Age | ||||
| ≤ 69 yr old | 81 | 163.00 (147.00, 171.00) | 0.503 | .778 |
| 70–79 yr old | 43 | 163.00 (156.00, 172.00) | ||
| ≥ 80 yr old | 65 | 160.00 (153.00, 173.00) | ||
| Payment method of medical expenses | ||||
| Fully self-paid expense | 10 | 151.90 ± 19.513 | 5.356 | .005 |
| Medical insurance | 151 | 160.36 ± 14.386 | ||
| Public medical | 28 | 167.86 ± 11.906 | ||
| Stroke type | ||||
| Cerebral infarction | 143 | 161.31 ± 14.760 | –0.463 | .644 |
| Cerebral hemorrhage | 46 | 160.15 ± 14.546 | ||
| Stroke number | ||||
| First time | 98 | 162.15 ± 15.021 | 0.405 | .749 |
| 2 times | 64 | 159.88 ± 13.149 | ||
| 3 times | 21 | 159.91 ± 16.087 | ||
| 4 times and above | 6 | 158.83 ± 21.377 | ||
| Whether accompanied by other chronic diseases | ||||
| No | 7 | 152.43 ± 22.634 | 2.675 | .049 |
| 1 type | 37 | 161.95 ± 12.981 | ||
| 2 types | 35 | 156.26 ± 14.716 | ||
| 3 types and above | 110 | 162.78 ± 14.309 | ||
| Self-care ability | ||||
| Mild disability | 75 | 162.32 ± 14.005 | 0.551 | .577 |
| Moderate disability | 34 | 159.38 ± 13.500 | ||
| Severe disability | 80 | 160.51 ± 15.806 | ||
| Caregivers | ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 69 | 157.75 ± 14.763 | 2.352 | .020 |
| Female | 120 | 162.91 ± 14.354 | ||
| Age | ||||
| ≤ 49 yr old | 56 | 160.00 (144.00, 170.50) | 2.079 | .556 |
| 50–59 yr old | 55 | 163.00 (154.00, 173.00) | ||
| 60–69 yr old | 60 | 165.50 (151.00, 171.00) | ||
| ≥70 yr old | 18 | 161.00 (156.75, 170.50) | ||
| Religious belief | ||||
| No | 21 | 160.38 ± 14.908 | 1.735 | .084 |
| Yes | 168 | 166.24 ± 11.717 | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 175 | 166.00 (150.50, 175.75) | –0.688 | .491 |
| Unmarried and others | 14 | 162.00 (150.00, 171.00) | ||
| Household monthly income per capita | ||||
| 1000–3999 | 43 | 159.02 ± 14.489 | 1.646 | .180 |
| 4000–6999 | 68 | 160.79 ± 14.279 | ||
| 7000–9999 | 45 | 159.69 ± 15.254 | ||
| ≥10000 | 33 | 165.94 ± 14.506 | ||
| Relationship with the patient | ||||
| Spouse | 165.00 (156.00, 171.50) | –1.382 | .167 | |
| Children and others | 160.50 (147.00, 171.75) | |||
| Daily care time | ||||
| <12 h | 84 | 161.32 ± 13.960 | –0.246 | .806 |
| ≥12 h | 105 | 160.79 ± 15.294 | ||
| Continuous care time | ||||
| ≤1year | 111 | 162.08 ± 14.775 | –0.525 | .666 |
| 1 ∼ 5 yr | 37 | 159.08 ± 15.227 | ||
| 5 ∼10 yr | 31 | 159.45 ± 13.591 | ||
| ≥10 yr | 10 | 161.40 ± 15.848 | ||
| Are there other people sharing the care tasks | ||||
| No | 69 | 161.17 ± 14.252 | –0.104 | .917 |
| Yes | 120 | 160.94 ± 14.976 | ||
| Care pressure | ||||
| No | 30 | 163.00 (151.25, 171.25) | 2.312 | .510 |
| A little bit | 75 | 162.00 (148.00, 176.00) | ||
| Relatively large | 60 | 162.50 (153.25, 171.75) | ||
| Very large | 24 | 159.50 (144.00, 167.00) | ||
| Conscious health | ||||
| Very good | 36 | 163.25 ± 16.065 | 1.232 | .299 |
| Good | 76 | 162.21 ± 13.465 | ||
| Normal | 61 | 159.49 ± 15.419 | ||
| Poor | 16 | 156.25 ± 13.694 | ||
Correlation analysis of the empowerment of primary caregivers (N = 189).
| Variable | ||
| Self-efficacy | 0.326 | .000 |
| Positive coping style | 0.189 | .000 |
| Negative coping style | 0.333 | .009 |
| Subjective support | 0.272 | .000 |
| Objective support | 0.061 | .407 |
| Support utilization | 0.091 | .211 |
Independent variables assignment method.
| Variables | Assignment method |
| Patient | |
| Payment method of medical expenses | Fully self-paid = 1; medical insurance = 2; public medical = 3 |
| Whether accompanied by other chronic diseases | No = 1; 1 type = 2; 2 types = 3; 3 types and above = 4 |
| Caregiver | |
| Gender | Male = 0; Female = 1 |
| Self-efficacy | Original value substitution |
| Positive response | Original value substitution |
| Negative coping style | Original value substitution |
| Subjective support | Original value substitution |
Multiple regression analysis on the factors associated with empowerment.
| Variables | B | SE | β | t | F | VIF | ||
| Constant term | 94.826 | 8.199 | 11.565 | .000 | 10.637 | .000 | ||
| Patient | ||||||||
| Payment method of medical expenses | 7.449 | 2.104 | 0.223 | 3.541 | .001 | 1.013 | ||
| Whether accompanied by other chronic diseases | –0.025 | 1.039 | –0.002 | –0.024 | .981 | 1.065 | ||
| Caregiver | ||||||||
| Gender | 5.039 | 1.934 | 0.166 | 2.605 | .010 | 1.034 | ||
| Self-efficacy | 6.456 | 1.927 | 0.229 | 3.350 | .001 | 1.194 | ||
| Positive response | 0.585 | 0.179 | 0.223 | 3.278 | .001 | 1.181 | ||
| Negative coping style | 0.342 | 0.177 | 0.124 | 1.934 | .055 | 1.041 | ||
| Subjective support | 0.439 | 0.199 | 0.144 | 2.200 | .029 | 1.099 | ||