| Literature DB >> 33592442 |
Parteek Singh Thind1, Arjun Sareen2, Dapinder Deep Singh3, Sandeep Singh4, Siby John5.
Abstract
COVID-19 induced pandemic situations have put the bio-medical waste (BMW) management system, of the world, to test. Sudden influx, of COVID-infected patients, in health-care facilities, has increased the generation of yellow category BMW (Y-BMW) and put substantial burden on the BMW-incineration units of India. This study presents the compromising situation of the BMW-incineration units of India, in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, from 21st March 2020 to 31st August 2020. This analysis revealed that on an average each COVID-infected patient in India generates approximately 3.41 kg/d of BMW and average proportion of Y-BMW in it is 50.44%. Further, it was observed that on 13th July 2020, the total Y-BMW, generated by both the normal and COVID-infected patients, fully utilized the BMW-incineration capacity of India. Also, it was made evident that, during the study period, BMW-incineration emitted several pollutants and their concentration was in the order: NOx > CO > SOx > PM > HCl > Cd > Pb > Hg > PCBs > Ni > Cr > Be > As. Subsequently, life time cancer risk assessment depicted that with hazard quotient >10-6, Cd may induce carcinogenic health impacts on both the adults and children of India. Therefore, to mitigate the environmental-health impacts associated with the incineration of BMW, evaluation of various options, viz., alternative technologies, substitution of raw materials and separate treatment of specific wastes, was also done. It is expected that the findings of this study may encourage the global auditory comprising scientific community and authorities to adopt alternate BMW-management strategies during the pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative technology; Bio-medical waste; COVID-19; Health risk assessment; Heavy metals; Incineration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33592442 PMCID: PMC7869633 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071
Fig. 1Brief lay-out of the methodology adopted in present study.
Description of exposure parameters of ingestion and inhalation (Department of Environmental Affairs (DoEA), 2010)
| Denotations | Exposure Parameter (units) | Standard values | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | Concentration (inhalation: μg/m3) | – | – |
| BW | Body Weight (kg) | Adult = 70; Children = 15 | |
| EF | Exposure Frequency (d/y) | 350 (for both adults and children) | |
| ED | Exposure Duration (y) | Adult = 30; Children = 6 | |
| LT | Life Time (y) | 70 (for both adults and children) | |
| AT | Average exposure Time (y) | For Non-carcinogenic: ED ∗ 365; | |
| IRj | Rate of inhalation ( | 20 for adults and 10 for children |
Reference doses and slope factors of the pollutantsa.
| S.No. | Pollutants | Reference Dose (mg/kg/d) | Slope Factor (mg/kg/d)−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PCBs | – | 2 |
| 2 | As | 3.00E-04 | 15.1 |
| 3 | Be | – | 8.4 |
| 4 | Cd | 5.70E-05 | 6.3 |
| 5 | Cr6+ | 3.00E-05 | 41 |
| 6 | Ni | 2.50E-02 | 0.84 |
| 7 | Pb | 3.50E-03 | 0.042 |
| 8 | Hg0 | 8.60E-05 | – |
Acquired from US EPA region III (2007); http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm.
Proportion of Y-BMW in India.
| S.No. | State name | Proportion of Y-BMW (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mizoram | 34.5 |
| 2 | Delhi | 47 |
| 3 | Maharashtra | 44 |
| 4 | Uttrakhand | 44.97 |
| 5 | Haryana | 69.5 |
| 6 | Madhya Pradesh | 69.05 |
| 7 | Rajasthan | 44.09 |
| Average | 50.44 |
Fig. 2Daily generation of different types of BMW in India during pandemic.
Emission of pollutants during incineration of T-Y-BMW in India.
| S.No. | Pollutants | Emission factors (kg/T) | Emissions on incineration (mg/m3/d) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C–Y-BMW | T-Y-BMW | |||
| 1 | NOx | 1.78 | 3.63E-05 | 6.36E-05 |
| 2 | CO | 1.48 | 3.02E-05 | 5.29E-05 |
| 3 | SOx | 1.04 | 2.12E-05 | 3.71E-05 |
| 4 | PM | 0.74 | 1.51E-05 | 2.65E-05 |
| 5 | HCl | 0.07 | 1.42E-06 | 2.49E-06 |
| 6 | PCB | 0.02 | 4.75E-08 | 8.32E-08 |
| 7 | Be | 0.003 | 6.36E-09 | 1.11E-08 |
| 8 | Cr | 0.0005 | 1.05E-08 | 1.84E-08 |
| 9 | Ni | 0.001 | 2.59E-08 | 4.54E-08 |
| 10 | As | 0.0002 | 3.34E-10 | 5.86E-10 |
| 11 | Cd | 0.03 | 7.58E-07 | 1.33E-06 |
| 12 | Pb | 0.04 | 7.12E-07 | 1.25E-06 |
| 13 | Hg | 0.09 | 1.76E-07 | 3.09E-07 |
Environmental and health impacts associated with emissions from BMW-incineration.
| S.No. | Environmental impacts | Causative pollutant(s) | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Global warming | CO2 | |
| 2 | Acidification and damage to monuments | H2SO4 and HNO3 | |
| 3 | Water and soil pollution | Cl, Pb, Cu and Zn | |
| 4 | Smog formation | SO2 and NO2 | |
| 5 | Different types of malignancy viz., skin cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer, prostate cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | Cd, PCBs | |
| 6 | Decreased proportion of male births | PCBs | |
| 7 | Respiratory issues | PM, CO, SO2 and NO2 | |
| 8 | Hormonal imbalance | PM and PCB | |
| 9 | Congenital abnormality | PM and heavy metals | Ten et al. (2000); |
Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment.
| S.No. | Pollutants | Non-carcinogenic risk assessment | Carcinogenic risk assessment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard index | Riskcarcinogenic | ||||||||
| C–Y-BMW | T-Y-BMW | C–Y-BMW | T-Y-BMW | C–Y-BMW | T-Y-BMW | C–Y-BMW | T-Y-BMW | ||
| Adults | Adults | Children | Children | Adults | Adults | Children | Children | ||
| 1 | PCB | – | – | – | – | 1.33E-08 | 2.33E-08 | 7.60E-08 | 1.33E-07 |
| 2 | Be | 1.16E-04 | 2.02E-04 | 3.50E-04 | 6.13E-04 | 7.48E-09 | 1.31E-08 | 4.27E-08 | 7.46E-08 |
| 3 | Cr6+ | – | – | – | – | 6.03E-08 | 1.06E-07 | 3.44E-07 | 6.04E-07 |
| 4 | Ni | 3.42E-07 | 5.99E-07 | 1.04E-06 | 1.82E-06 | 3.05E-09 | 5.34E-09 | 1.74E-08 | 3.05E-08 |
| 5 | As | 3.67E-07 | 6.45E-07 | 1.11E-06 | 1.95E-06 | 7.06E-10 | 1.24E-09 | 4.03E-09 | 7.08E-09 |
| 6 | Cd | 4.39E-03 | 7.70E-03 | 1.33E-02 | 2.33E-02 | 6.69E-07 | |||
| 7 | Pb | 6.71E-05 | 1.18E-04 | 2.03E-04 | 3.57E-04 | 4.19E-09 | 7.35E-09 | 2.39E-08 | 4.20E-08 |
| 8 | Hg | 6.75E-04 | 1.19E-03 | 2.05E-03 | 3.59E-03 | – | – | – | – |
Comparison of different BMW management technologies.
| Type of technology | Capacity | Installation cost | Operation cost | Pollution (air and water) | Volume reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autoclave | ●●●● | ●● | ●●● | ● | ●● |
| Microwave | ●● | ●● | ●● | ● | ●● |
| Incineration | ●●●●● | ●●●● | ●●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●● |
| Pyrolysis | ●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●● | ●●● |
| Plasma | ●●● | ●●●●● | ●●●●● | ●● | ●●● |
| Chemical disinfection | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● | ●●● |
Treatment of specific wastes and its benefits.
| S.No. | Waste type | BMW category | Alternate treatment | Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharps (comprising plastic and metal) | Yellow, red and blue | Separate plastic and metallic parts Reusing metallic parts by sending it to foundry | Reduced emissions of heavy metals |
| 2 | Anatomical waste | Yellow | Interment burial in cemeteries and burning in crematoria Incineration in cement industries | Reduced burden on incineration units |
| 3 | Pathological waste | Yellow | Interment burial in cemeteries and burning in crematoria Alkali-based chemical treatment Incineration in cement industries | Reduced burden on incineration units |
| 4 | Pharmaceutical and chemical waste | Blue, red | Good inventory control Return to manufacturer Just-in-time purchasing Recover solvents using fractional distillation Incineration in cement industries | Recovery of chemicals Reduced burden on incineration units |
| 5 | PPE kits | Yellow, blue and red | Re-use after chemical treatment Incineration in cement industries | Reduced burden on incineration units Reduced emissions |
As per MoEFCC (2016)