Literature DB >> 33592270

Interdependent self-construal predicts increased gray matter volume of scene processing regions in the brain.

Qinggang Yu1, Anthony P King2, Carolyn Yoon2, Israel Liberzon3, Stacey M Schaefer4, Richard J Davidson4, Shinobu Kitayama2.   

Abstract

Interdependent self-construal (SC) is thought to lead to a more holistic cognitive style that emphasizes the processing of the background scene of a focal object. At present, little is known about whether the structural properties of the brain might underlie this functional relationship. Here, we examined the gray matter (GM) volume of three cortical regions involved in scene processing -- a cornerstone of contextual processing. Study 1 tested 78 European American non-student adults and found that interdependent (vs. independent) SC predicts higher GM volume in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), one of the three target regions. Testing both European American and East Asian college students (total N = 126), Study 2 replicated this association. Moreover, the GM volume of all the three target regions was greater for East Asians than for European Americans. Our findings suggest that there is a structural neural underpinning for the cultural variation in cognitive style.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural difference; Parahippocampal place area; Scene processing; Self-construal; Voxel-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592270      PMCID: PMC8375393          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  51 in total

Review 1.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

Authors:  R E Nisbett; K Peng; I Choi; A Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  S S Iyengar; M R Lepper
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-03

3.  Hemispheric shape of European and Japanese brains: 3-D MRI analysis of intersubject variability, ethnical, and gender differences.

Authors:  K Zilles; R Kawashima; A Dabringhaus; H Fukuda; T Schormann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Age and culture modulate object processing and object-scene binding in the ventral visual area.

Authors:  Joshua O Goh; Michael W Chee; Jiat Chow Tan; Vinod Venkatraman; Andrew Hebrank; Eric D Leshikar; Lucas Jenkins; Bradley P Sutton; Angela H Gutchess; Denise C Park
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.

Authors:  Daphna Oyserman; Spike W S Lee
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Power anomalies in testing mediation.

Authors:  David A Kenny; Charles M Judd
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-05

7.  Cultural differences in the visual processing of meaning: detecting incongruities between background and foreground objects using the N400.

Authors:  Sharon G Goto; Yumi Ando; Carol Huang; Alicia Yee; Richard S Lewis
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The effect of culture on perspective taking.

Authors:  Shali Wu; Boaz Keysar
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

9.  The gray matter volume of the temporoparietal junction varies across cultures: a moderating role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4).

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Qinggang Yu; Anthony P King; Carolyn Yoon; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain.

Authors:  David Atkins; Ayse K Uskul; Nicholas R Cooper
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.