Literature DB >> 33592007

Satellite tracking of rehabilitated sea turtles suggests a high rate of short-term survival following release.

David P Robinson1,2,3, Kevin Hyland1,4, Gerhard Beukes1,5, Abdulkareem Vettan1,5, Aneeshkumar Mabadikate1,5, Rima W Jabado6, Christoph A Rohner3, Simon J Pierce3, Warren Baverstock1,7.   

Abstract

The rehabilitation of wildlife can contribute directly to the conservation of threatened species by helping to maintain wild populations. This study focused on determining the post-rehabilitation survival and spatial ecology of sea turtles and on comparing the movements of individuals with flipper amputations (amputees) to non-amputee animals. Our aims were to assess whether rehabilitated sea turtles survive after release, to compare and contrast the movement characteristics of the different species of sea turtles we tracked, and to examine whether amputees and non-amputees within species behaved similarly post-release. Twenty-six rehabilitated sea turtles from four species, including hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata (n = 12), loggerhead Caretta caretta (n = 11), green Chelonia mydas (n = 2), and olive ridley Lepidochelys olivacea (n = 1) sea turtles from the United Arab Emirates were fitted with satellite tags before release. Rehabilitation times ranged from 89 to 817 days (mean 353 ± 237 days). Post-release movements and survival were monitored for 8 to 387 days (mean 155 ± 95 days) through satellite tracking. Tag data suggested that three tracked sea turtles died within four days of release, one after 27 days, and one after 192 days from what are thought to be anthropogenic factors unrelated to their pre-rehabilitation ailments. We then compared habitat use and movement characteristics among the different sea turtle species. Although half of all turtles crossed one or more international boundaries, dispersal varied among species. Loggerhead turtles had a high dispersal, with 80% crossing an international boundary, while hawksbill turtles displayed higher post-release residency, with 66% remaining within UAE territorial waters. Amputee turtles moved similarly to non-amputee animals of the same species. Loggerhead turtles travelled faster (mean ± sd = 15.3 ± 8 km/day) than hawksbill turtles (9 ± 7 km/day). Both amputee and non-amputee sea turtles within a species moved similarly. Our tracking results highlight that rehabilitated sea turtles, including amputees, can successfully survive in the wild following release for up to our ~one-year monitoring time therefore supporting the suitability for release of sea turtles that have recovered from major injuries such as amputations. However, more broadly, the high mortality from anthropogenic factors in the Arabian Gulf region is clearly a serious issue and conservation challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592007      PMCID: PMC7886132          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Gulf: a young sea in decline.

Authors:  Charles Sheppard; Mohsen Al-Husiani; F Al-Jamali; Faiza Al-Yamani; Rob Baldwin; James Bishop; Francesca Benzoni; Eric Dutrieux; Nicholas K Dulvy; Subba Rao V Durvasula; David A Jones; Ron Loughland; David Medio; M Nithyanandan; Graham M Pilling; Igor Polikarpov; Andrew R G Price; Sam Purkis; Bernhard Riegl; Maria Saburova; Kaveh Samimi Namin; Oliver Taylor; Simon Wilson; Khadija Zainal
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Use of long-distance migration patterns of an endangered species to inform conservation planning for the world's largest marine protected area.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Jeanne A Mortimer; Daniel Ierodiaconou; Nicole Esteban
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna.

Authors:  Barbara A Block; Steven L H Teo; Andreas Walli; Andre Boustany; Michael J W Stokesbury; Charles J Farwell; Kevin C Weng; Heidi Dewar; Thomas D Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Long-term photo-id and satellite tracking reveal sex-biased survival linked to movements in an endangered species.

Authors:  Gail Schofield; Marcel Klaassen; Kostas Papafitsoros; Martin K S Lilley; Kostas A Katselidis; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Marine debris ingestion of green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, (Linnaeus, 1758) from the eastern coast of the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Fadi Yaghmour; Marwa Al Bousi; Brendan Whittington-Jones; John Pereira; Soledad García-Nuñez; Jane Budd
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Global conservation priorities for marine turtles.

Authors:  Bryan P Wallace; Andrew D DiMatteo; Alan B Bolten; Milani Y Chaloupka; Brian J Hutchinson; F Alberto Abreu-Grobois; Jeanne A Mortimer; Jeffrey A Seminoff; Diego Amorocho; Karen A Bjorndal; Jérôme Bourjea; Brian W Bowen; Raquel Briseño Dueñas; Paolo Casale; B C Choudhury; Alice Costa; Peter H Dutton; Alejandro Fallabrino; Elena M Finkbeiner; Alexandre Girard; Marc Girondot; Mark Hamann; Brendan J Hurley; Milagros López-Mendilaharsu; Maria Angela Marcovaldi; John A Musick; Ronel Nel; Nicolas J Pilcher; Sebastian Troëng; Blair Witherington; Roderic B Mast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Satellite tagging of rehabilitated green sea turtles Chelonia mydas from the United Arab Emirates, including the longest tracked journey for the species.

Authors:  David P Robinson; Rima W Jabado; Christoph A Rohner; Simon J Pierce; Kevin P Hyland; Warren R Baverstock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation of Marine Turtles and Welfare Improvement by Application of Environmental Enrichment Strategies.

Authors:  Cesar Marcial Escobedo-Bonilla; Noelia Maria Quiros-Rojas; Esteban Rudín-Salazar
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.