Literature DB >> 33591751

Modeling Effects of Surface Properties and Probe Density for Nanoscale Biosensor Design: A Case Study of DNA Hybridization near Surfaces.

Timothy Cholko1, Chia-En A Chang1.   

Abstract

Electrochemical biosensors have extremely robust applications while offering ease of preparation, miniaturization, and tunability. By adjusting the arrangement and properties of immobilized probes on the sensor surface to optimize target-probe association, one can design highly sensitive and efficient sensors. In electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors, a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) is widely used as a tunable surface with inserted DNA or RNA probes to detect target sequences. The effects of inhomogeneous probe distribution across surfaces are difficult to study experimentally due to inadequate resolution. Regions of high probe density may inhibit hybridization with targets, and the magnitude of the effect may vary depending on the hybridization mechanism on a given surface. Another fundamental question concerns diffusion and hybridization of DNA taking place on surfaces and whether it speeds up or hinders molecular recognition. We used all-atom Brownian dynamics simulations to help answer these questions by simulating the hybridization process of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) targets with a ssDNA probe on polar, nonpolar, and anionic SAMs at three different probe surface densities. Moreover, we simulated three tightly packed probe clusters by modeling clusters with different interprobe spacing on two different surfaces. Our results indicate that hybridization efficiency depends strongly on finding a balance that allows attractive forces to steer target DNA toward probes without anchoring it to the surface. Furthermore, we found that the hybridization rate becomes severely hindered when interprobe spacing is less than or equal to the target DNA length, proving the need for a careful design to both enhance target-probe association and avoid steric hindrance. We developed a general kinetic model to predict hybridization times and found that it works accurately for typical probe densities. These findings elucidate basic features of nanoscale biosensors, which can aid in rational design efforts and help explain trends in experimental hybridization rates at different probe densities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33591751      PMCID: PMC8283776          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c09723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  36 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Surface-driven DNA assembly of binary cubic 3D nanocrystal superlattices.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Noh; Albert M Hung; Jennifer N Cha
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  Nanoscale spatial distribution of thiolated DNA on model nucleic acid sensor surfaces.

Authors:  Eric A Josephs; Tao Ye
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Analysis of Ligand-Receptor Association and Intermediate Transfer Rates in Multienzyme Nanostructures with All-Atom Brownian Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Christopher C Roberts; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions.

Authors:  O G Berg; P H von Hippel
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1985

6.  DNA surface hybridization regimes.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Rastislav Levicky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.

Authors:  James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Sliding of proteins non-specifically bound to DNA: Brownian dynamics studies with coarse-grained protein and DNA models.

Authors:  Tadashi Ando; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Real-time reliable determination of binding kinetics of DNA hybridization using a multi-channel graphene biosensor.

Authors:  Shicai Xu; Jian Zhan; Baoyuan Man; Shouzhen Jiang; Weiwei Yue; Shoubao Gao; Chengang Guo; Hanping Liu; Zhenhua Li; Jihua Wang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Surface effects mediate self-assembly of amyloid-β peptides.

Authors:  Yi-Chih Lin; E James Petersson; Zahra Fakhraai
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  1 in total

1.  GeomBD3: Brownian Dynamics Simulation Software for Biological and Engineered Systems.

Authors:  Timothy Cholko; Shivansh Kaushik; Kingsley Y Wu; Ruben Montes; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.162

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.