Literature DB >> 33589463

Characteristics and practices of school-based cluster randomised controlled trials for improving health outcomes in pupils in the UK: a systematic review protocol.

Kitty Parker1, Michael P Nunns2, ZhiMin Xiao3, Tamsin Ford4, Obioha C Ukoumunne5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) are studies in which groups (clusters) of participants rather than the individuals themselves are randomised to trial arms. CRTs are becoming increasingly relevant for evaluating interventions delivered in school settings for improving the health of children. Schools are a convenient setting for health interventions targeted at children and the CRT design respects the clustered structure in schools (ie, pupils within classrooms/teachers within schools). Some of the methodological challenges of CRTs, such as ethical considerations for enrolment of children into trials and how best to handle the analysis of data from participants (pupils) that change clusters (schools), may be more salient for the school setting. A better understanding of the characteristics and methodological considerations of school-based CRTs of health interventions would inform the design of future similar studies. To our knowledge, this is the only systematic review to focus specifically on the characteristics and methodological practices of CRTs delivered in schools to evaluate interventions for improving health outcomes in pupils in the UK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for CRTs published from inception to 30 June 2020 inclusively indexed in MEDLINE (Ovid). We will identify relevant articles through title and abstract screening, and subsequent full-text screening for eligibility against predefined inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Two independent reviewers will extract data for each study using a prepiloted data extraction form. Findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics and graphs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This methodological systematic review does not require ethical approval as only secondary data extracted from papers will be analysed and the data are not linked to individual participants. After completion of the systematic review, the data will be analysed, and the findings disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020201792. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community child health; public health; statistics & research methods

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33589463      PMCID: PMC7887361          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  21 in total

1.  Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research.

Authors:  M J Campbell
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.

Authors:  Sherri P Varnell; David M Murray; Jessica B Janega; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Deborah Ashby; Gene S Feder; Alicja R Rudnicka; Obioha C Ukoumunne
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Prior distributions for the intracluster correlation coefficient, based on multiple previous estimates, and their application in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; Simon G Thompson; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  Statistics notes. Trials randomised in clusters.

Authors:  J M Bland; S M Kerry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-06

Review 6.  Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement.

Authors:  Silke Walleser; Suzanne R Hill; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards.

Authors:  Monica Taljaard; Jessie McGowan; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Jamie C Brehaut; Andrew McRae; Martin P Eccles; Allan Donner
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Controlled trials in children: quantity, methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of pediatric controlled trials published 1948-2006.

Authors:  Denise Thomson; Lisa Hartling; Eyal Cohen; Ben Vandermeer; Lisa Tjosvold; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mallorie H Fiero; Shuang Huang; Eyal Oren; Melanie L Bell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Intraclass correlation values for adolescent health outcomes in secondary schools in 21 European countries.

Authors:  N Shackleton; D Hale; C Bonell; R M Viner
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-04-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics and practices of school-based cluster randomised controlled trials for improving health outcomes in pupils in the United Kingdom: a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Kitty Parker; Michael Nunns; ZhiMin Xiao; Tamsin Ford; Obioha C Ukoumunne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.