| Literature DB >> 33588938 |
Fiona A Quirke1,2,3, Patricia Healy4,5, Elaine Ní Bhraonáin6, Mandy Daly7, Linda Biesty4,5,8, Tim Hurley9,10, Karen Walker11, Shireen Meher12, David M Haas13, Frank H Bloomfield14, Jamie J Kirkham15, Eleanor J Molloy10,16, Declan Devane17,4,5,18,19.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Delphi method is used in a wide variety of settings as a method of building consensus on important issues. Traditionally, the Delphi method uses multiple rounds of a survey to allow for feedback of other participants' survey responses in between rounds. By informing participants about how others answer a question or prioritise specific topics, it allows for diverse opinions to inform the consensus process. For this reason, the Delphi method is popular as a consensus building approach in developing core outcome sets (COS), i.e. the minimum agreed set of standardised outcomes that should be measured and reported in studies on a specific health condition. In a COS setting, participants prioritise the importance of outcomes for inclusion in a COS. This usually involves participating in multiple rounds of a survey that can span several weeks or months. Challenges with participant retention have been highlighted in previous COS. We will compare a three-round with a Real-Time Delphi approach on prioritised outcomes. This trial is embedded within the COHESION study which is developing a COS for interventions treating neonatal encephalopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Core outcome sets; Methodology; Multi-Round Delphi; Randomised trial; Real-Time Delphi
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33588938 PMCID: PMC7885346 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05074-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279