Vera IJmker-Hemink1, Nora Lize2, Sandra Beijer2, Natasja Raijmakers2,3, Geert Wanten4, Manon van den Berg5. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology - Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Vera.IJmkerHemink@radboudumc.nl. 2. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Netherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology - Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the field of nutrition is challenging and success highly depends on understanding the factors that influence recruitment and dropout of participants. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a RCT that evaluated a home delivered meal service in advanced cancer patients while receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: This pilot RCT aimed to enroll 20 participants who were randomized into the home deliveredmeal service group or usual care group. Study procedures took place before chemotherapy (T0), 3 weeks after T0 (T1), 6 weeks after T0 (T2) and 3 months after T2 (T3). All information regarding recruitment, dropout and study procedures was recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed by in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Over 7 months, 20 of 41 approached patients (49%) were included, followed by a dropout rate of 35%. At baseline, hand grip strength (n = 8/16), the Short Physical Performance Battery (n = 12/16) and nutritional intake (n = 8/16) had the highest rate of missing values. Study procedures were not experienced as burdensome and planning of these procedures in line with fixed hospital appointments contributed to this low burden. Keeping the symptom diary was mentioned as being burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to conduct a RCT on a home delivered meal service in advanced cancer patients during chemotherapy, although recruitment is challenging. Close contact of patients with recruiting personnel is essential to sustain motivation. To increase compliance with the study protocol it is important to carefully instruct participants on how to complete questionnaires and to emphasize to use these in the communication with their practitioners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03382171 .
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Performing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the field of nutrition is challenging and success highly depends on understanding the factors that influence recruitment and dropout of participants. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a RCT that evaluated a home delivered meal service in advanced cancerpatients while receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: This pilot RCT aimed to enroll 20 participants who were randomized into the home delivered meal service group or usual care group. Study procedures took place before chemotherapy (T0), 3 weeks after T0 (T1), 6 weeks after T0 (T2) and 3 months after T2 (T3). All information regarding recruitment, dropout and study procedures was recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed by in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Over 7 months, 20 of 41 approached patients (49%) were included, followed by a dropout rate of 35%. At baseline, hand grip strength (n = 8/16), the Short Physical Performance Battery (n = 12/16) and nutritional intake (n = 8/16) had the highest rate of missing values. Study procedures were not experienced as burdensome and planning of these procedures in line with fixed hospital appointments contributed to this low burden. Keeping the symptom diary was mentioned as being burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to conduct a RCT on a home delivered meal service in advanced cancerpatients during chemotherapy, although recruitment is challenging. Close contact of patients with recruiting personnel is essential to sustain motivation. To increase compliance with the study protocol it is important to carefully instruct participants on how to complete questionnaires and to emphasize to use these in the communication with their practitioners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03382171 .
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Chemotherapy; Nutritional intervention; Pilot study; Qualitative interviews
Authors: Johanna Hoekstra; Rien de Vos; Nico P van Duijn; Egbert Schadé; Patrick J E Bindels Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Dorian N Dijxhoorn; Manon G A van den Berg; Wietske Kievit; Julia Korzilius; Joost P H Drenth; Geert J A Wanten Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Vera E IJmker-Hemink; Dorian N Dijxhoorn; Claudia M Briseno Ozumbilla; Geert Ja Wanten; Manon Ga van den Berg Journal: Nutrition Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: David H Henry; Hema N Viswanathan; Eric P Elkin; Shana Traina; Shawn Wade; David Cella Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 3.603