Literature DB >> 33588930

How effective are three methods of teaching oral hygiene for adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment? The MAHO protocol: an RCT comparing visual, auditory and kinesthetic methods.

Alisée Le Fouler1, Sylvie Jeanne2, Olivier Sorel1, Damien Brézulier3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fixed orthodontic appliances hamper oral hygiene procedures. The consequences are gingivitis and white spot lesions. Fifty to 70% of patients treated with braces encounter these problems. Their care in the USA represents an annual cost of five hundred million dollars. Initial education and motivation for oral hygiene depend on two categories of factors: firstly, practical prophylactic measures (instruments and medication, professional care) and secondly, the educational component: choice of communication technique, frequency, and nature of hygiene instructions. This trial aims to study this last component. Its main objective is to compare three methods' effectiveness of oral hygiene education in adolescent patients treated with braces in terms of biofilm (plaque) control. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of these methods' effectiveness regarding gingival inflammation and the maintenance of hygiene during the first 6 months of treatment.
METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial of superiority. It evaluates the effectiveness of three hygiene education techniques. A total of 90 patients from the University Hospital Center of Rennes will be randomized into 3 parallel groups with a 1:1:1 ratio. Each will benefit from a different educational method: oral and/or practical. The main outcome will be the average plaque index for each group after 6 months of treatment. Additional outcomes will be the average gingival index for each group and the plaque and gingival indices over 6 months. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of preventive procedures for optimizing oral hygiene during orthodontics is based on ambiguous literature. As a result, it is difficult to draw conclusions and to translate them into everyday practice. Sixty-eight percent of the orthodontists support the development of guidelines for education. The aim of this study is to standardize methods of oral hygiene education during orthodontic fixed treatment. The purpose of this study would be to provide practitioners with a concrete education program through guidelines dedicated to the method having the best results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04444154 . Registered on 22 June 2020. SI CNRIPH ID 8011N° 20.04.27.58337. Registered on 29 July 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory learning; Education; Guideline; Kinesthetic learning; Oral health; Orthodontic treatment; Prevention; Study protocol; Visual learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588930      PMCID: PMC7885203          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05093-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  29 in total

1.  A comparison between written, verbal, and videotape oral hygiene instruction for patients with fixed appliances.

Authors:  A Lees; W P Rock
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2000-12

2.  Longitudinal changes in microbiology and clinical periodontal parameters after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Jan van Gastel; Marc Quirynen; Wim Teughels; Wim Coucke; Carine Carels
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing.

Authors:  A M Geiger; L Gorelick; A J Gwinnett; B J Benson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Plaque levels of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances measured by digital plaque image analysis.

Authors:  Malgorzata Klukowska; Annike Bader; Christina Erbe; Philip Bellamy; Donald J White; Mary Kay Anastasia; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Association of clinical parameters with periodontal bacterial haemolytic activity.

Authors:  Benedicta K J Wong; Neil R McGregor; Henry L Butt; Rachel Knight; Louise Ye Liu; Ivan B Darby
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 6.  Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment.

Authors:  Philip E Benson; Nicola Parkin; Fiona Dyer; Declan T Millett; Susan Furness; Peter Germain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

7.  Efficacy of ultrasonic, electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Mauricio Ribeiro Costa; Vanessa Camila Silva; Miriam Nakatani Miqui; Tatsuko Sakima; Denise Madalena Palomari Spolidorio; Joni Augusto Cirelli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effect of visual method vs plaque disclosure in enhancing oral hygiene in adolescents and young adults: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yiran Peng; Ruixian Wu; Wenwen Qu; Wanhong Wu; Jiangyue Chen; Jie Fang; Yangxi Chen; Mauro Farella; Li Mei
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Eighteen-month evaluation of the effects of a 0.4% stannous fluoride gel on gingivitis in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  R L Boyd; Y S Chun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Why video health education messages should be considered for all dental waiting rooms.

Authors:  Michelle McNab; Tony Skapetis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in Distribution of Dental Biofilm after Insertion of Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.

Authors:  Urszula Kozak; Agnieszka Lasota; Renata Chałas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Influence of probiotics on the periodontium, the oral microbiota and the immune response during orthodontic treatment in adolescent and adult patients (ProMB Trial): study protocol for a prospective, double-blind, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Corinna L Seidel; Roman G Gerlach; Matthias Weider; Theresa Wölfel; Vincent Schwarz; Armin Ströbel; Helga Schmetzer; Christian Bogdan; Lina Gölz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.747

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.