Literature DB >> 33588893

Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial.

Sigismond Lasocki1, Pierre Asfar2, Samir Jaber3, Martine Ferrandiere4, Thomas Kerforne5, Karim Asehnoune6, Philippe Montravers7, Philippe Seguin8, Katell Peoc'h9,10,11, Soizic Gergaud12, Nicolas Nagot13, Thibaud Lefebvre9, Sylvain Lehmann14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anemic patients after a prolonged ICU stay and affect the post-ICU outcomes.
METHODS: In a controlled, single-blinded, multicenter study, anemic (WHO definition) critically ill patients with an ICU stay ≥ 5 days were randomized when discharge was expected to either intervention by hepcidin treatment protocol or control. In the intervention arm, patients were treated with intravenous iron (1 g of ferric carboxymaltose) when hepcidin was < 20 μg/l and with intravenous iron and erythropoietin for 20 ≤ hepcidin < 41 μg/l. Control patients were treated according to standard care (hepcidin quantification remained blinded). Primary endpoint was the number of days spent in hospital 90 days after ICU discharge (post-ICU LOS). Secondary endpoints were day 15 anemia, day 30 fatigue, day 90 mortality and 1-year survival.
RESULTS: Of 405 randomized patients, 399 were analyzed (201 in intervention and 198 in control arm). A total of 220 patients (55%) had ID at discharge (i.e., a hepcidin < 41 μg/l). Primary endpoint was not different (medians (IQR) post-ICU LOS 33(13;90) vs. 33(11;90) days for intervention and control, respectively, median difference - 1(- 3;1) days, p = 0.78). D90 mortality was significantly lower in intervention arm (16(8%) vs 33(16.6%) deaths, absolute risk difference - 8.7 (- 15.1 to - 2.3)%, p = 0.008, OR 95% IC, 0.46, 0.22-0.94, p = 0.035), and one-year survival was improved (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of ID diagnosed according to hepcidin levels did not reduce the post-ICU LOS, but was associated with a significant reduction in D90 mortality and with improved 1-year survival in critically ill patients about to be discharged after a prolonged stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrial.gov NCT02276690 (October 28, 2014; retrospectively registered).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anemia; Critically ill; Erythropoietin; Hepcidin; Iron (treatment); Iron deficiency; Length of stay; Mortality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588893      PMCID: PMC7885380          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  2 in total

1.  LC-MS/MS method for hepcidin-25 measurement in human and mouse serum: clinical and research implications in iron disorders.

Authors:  Thibaud Lefebvre; Nathalie Dessendier; Dounia Houamel; Nathalie Ialy-Radio; Caroline Kannengiesser; Hana Manceau; Carole Beaumont; Gael Nicolas; Laurent Gouya; Hervé Puy; Zoubida Karim
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people.

Authors:  Bita Mesgarpour; Benedikt H Heidinger; Dominik Roth; Susanne Schmitz; Cathal D Walsh; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-25
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Early Post-Hospitalization Hemoglobin Recovery and Clinical Outcomes in Survivors of Critical Illness: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Matthew A Warner; Andrew C Hanson; Phillip J Schulte; Nareg H Roubinian; Curt Storlie; Gabriel Demuth; Ognjen Gajic; Daryl J Kor
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.889

2.  Targeted treatment of iron deficiency in prolonged critical illness: an opportunity to improve survival or not?

Authors:  Jan Gunst; Greet Van den Berghe; Michael P Casaer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.