U J Spiegl1, P-L Hölbing2, J-S Jarvers2, N V D Höh2, P Pieroh2, G Osterhoff2, C-E Heyde2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. uli.spiegl@gmx.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evidence for the treatment of midthoracic fractures in elderly patients is weak. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm results after posterior stabilization of unstable midthoracic fractures in the elderly. METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients aged ≥65 suffering from an acute unstable midthoracic fracture treated with posterior stabilization were included. Trauma mechanism, ASA score, concomitant injuries, ODI score and radiographic loss of reduction were evaluated. Posterior stabilization strategy was divided into short-segmental stabilization and long-segmental stabilization. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (76.9 ± 6.3 years; 51% female) were included. The fracture was caused by a low-energy trauma mechanism in 22 patients (35.6%). Twenty-one patients died during the follow-up period (35.6%). Remaining patients (n = 38) were followed up after a mean of 60 months. Patients who died were significantly older (p = 0.01) and had significantly higher ASA scores (p = 0.02). Adjacent thoracic cage fractures had no effect on mortality or outcome scores. A total of 12 sequential vertebral fractures occurred (35.3%). The mean ODI at the latest follow up was 31.3 ± 24.7, the mean regional sagittal loss of reduction was 5.1° (± 4.0). Patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral fractures during follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Unstable fractures of the midthoracic spine are associated with high rates of thoracic cage injuries. The mortality rate was rather high. The majority of the survivors had minimal to moderate disabilities. Thereby, patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral body fractures during follow-up.
BACKGROUND: The evidence for the treatment of midthoracic fractures in elderly patients is weak. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm results after posterior stabilization of unstable midthoracic fractures in the elderly. METHODS: Retrospectively, all patients aged ≥65 suffering from an acute unstable midthoracic fracture treated with posterior stabilization were included. Trauma mechanism, ASA score, concomitant injuries, ODI score and radiographic loss of reduction were evaluated. Posterior stabilization strategy was divided into short-segmental stabilization and long-segmental stabilization. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (76.9 ± 6.3 years; 51% female) were included. The fracture was caused by a low-energy trauma mechanism in 22 patients (35.6%). Twenty-one patients died during the follow-up period (35.6%). Remaining patients (n = 38) were followed up after a mean of 60 months. Patients who died were significantly older (p = 0.01) and had significantly higher ASA scores (p = 0.02). Adjacent thoracic cage fractures had no effect on mortality or outcome scores. A total of 12 sequential vertebral fractures occurred (35.3%). The mean ODI at the latest follow up was 31.3 ± 24.7, the mean regional sagittal loss of reduction was 5.1° (± 4.0). Patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral fractures during follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Unstable fractures of the midthoracic spine are associated with high rates of thoracic cage injuries. The mortality rate was rather high. The majority of the survivors had minimal to moderate disabilities. Thereby, patients treated with long segmental stabilization had a significantly lower rate of sequential vertebral body fractures during follow-up.
Entities:
Keywords:
Long segmental posterior stabilization; Midthoracic spine; Osteoporotic vertebral body fracture; Posterior stabilization; Thoracic cage injury
Authors: F M Maynard; M B Bracken; G Creasey; J F Ditunno; W H Donovan; T B Ducker; S L Garber; R J Marino; S L Stover; C H Tator; R L Waters; J E Wilberger; W Young Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Tiffany G Perry; Prasath Mageswaran; Robb W Colbrunn; Tara F Bonner; Todd Francis; Robert F McLain Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2014-06-20
Authors: Klaus John Schnake; Thomas R Blattert; Patrick Hahn; Alexander Franck; Frank Hartmann; Bernhard Ullrich; Akhil Verheyden; Sven Mörk; Volker Zimmermann; Oliver Gonschorek; Michael Müller; Sebastian Katscher; Andre El Saman; Gholam Pajenda; Robert Morrison; Christian Schinkel; Stefan Piltz; Axel Partenheimer; Christian W Müller; Erol Gercek; Michael Scherer; Nabila Bouzraki; Frank Kandziora Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-09-07
Authors: Thomas R Blattert; Klaus J Schnake; Oliver Gonschorek; Erol Gercek; Frank Hartmann; Sebastian Katscher; Sven Mörk; Robert Morrison; Michael Müller; Axel Partenheimer; Stefan Piltz; Michael A Scherer; Bernhard W Ullrich; Akhil Verheyden; Volker Zimmermann Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-09-07