Ahmad Osailan1. 1. Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh Region, 16237, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia. Ahmad.osailan@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of smartphones has become widely popular, especially among young people, for multiple purposes other than communication, including gaming and internet browsing. The hand and wrist weakness is one of the main complications associated with the increased use of smartphones. This weakness occurs due to the repetitive flexion and extension of the wrist, thumb, and fingers, leading to a significant musculoskeletal pathology. Little is known about the relationship between smartphone usage duration (using the phones ability to monitor screen time) and hand-grip, pinch-grip strength. Therefore, the study was aimed to investigate the association between smartphone usage duration and hand-grip, pinch-grip strength among young people. METHODS: One hundred young males volunteered to participate in the study. Participants were briefly examined for height and weight using a portable stadiometer and a digital scale. Hand-grip, pinch-grip strength measurement was performed using a hand-held dynamometer. Smartphones usage duration was obtained from the daily average screen time reported in the last seven days. RESULTS: Mean daily usage of smartphone among the participants was 7.8 ± 2.2. There was a weak significant inverse relationship between smartphone usage duration and hand-grip strength (r=-.22, p = .03) and pinch-grip strength (r=-.28, p = .004). Linear regression revealed that 18.8 % of the variance in hand-grip strength and 20.4 % of the variance in pinch-grip strength was explained by age, and smartphone usage duration, with the addition of BMI only to hand-grip strength (p's < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of smartphones was related to weaker hand-grip and pinch-grip. Despite the weak relationship, the study showed that smartphone usage duration might contribute as a factor along with age to hand muscles' strength.
BACKGROUND: The use of smartphones has become widely popular, especially among young people, for multiple purposes other than communication, including gaming and internet browsing. The hand and wrist weakness is one of the main complications associated with the increased use of smartphones. This weakness occurs due to the repetitive flexion and extension of the wrist, thumb, and fingers, leading to a significant musculoskeletal pathology. Little is known about the relationship between smartphone usage duration (using the phones ability to monitor screen time) and hand-grip, pinch-grip strength. Therefore, the study was aimed to investigate the association between smartphone usage duration and hand-grip, pinch-grip strength among young people. METHODS: One hundred young males volunteered to participate in the study. Participants were briefly examined for height and weight using a portable stadiometer and a digital scale. Hand-grip, pinch-grip strength measurement was performed using a hand-held dynamometer. Smartphones usage duration was obtained from the daily average screen time reported in the last seven days. RESULTS: Mean daily usage of smartphone among the participants was 7.8 ± 2.2. There was a weak significant inverse relationship between smartphone usage duration and hand-grip strength (r=-.22, p = .03) and pinch-grip strength (r=-.28, p = .004). Linear regression revealed that 18.8 % of the variance in hand-grip strength and 20.4 % of the variance in pinch-grip strength was explained by age, and smartphone usage duration, with the addition of BMI only to hand-grip strength (p's < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of smartphones was related to weaker hand-grip and pinch-grip. Despite the weak relationship, the study showed that smartphone usage duration might contribute as a factor along with age to hand muscles' strength.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hand functions; Hand-grip strength; Smartphones overuse; pinch-grip strength
Authors: Gabriella M Harari; Nicholas D Lane; Rui Wang; Benjamin S Crosier; Andrew T Campbell; Samuel D Gosling Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2016-11
Authors: Carisa Harris-Adamson; Ellen A Eisen; Jay Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; Matthew S Thiese; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley Evanoff; Susan Burt; Stephen Bao; Barbara Silverstein; Linda Merlino; Fred Gerr; David Rempel Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Matthew A Christensen; Laura Bettencourt; Leanne Kaye; Sai T Moturu; Kaylin T Nguyen; Jeffrey E Olgin; Mark J Pletcher; Gregory M Marcus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sandra Haider; Eva Luger; Ali Kapan; Sylvia Titze; Christian Lackinger; Karin E Schindler; Thomas E Dorner Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 4.147