Denise Brigitte Herbert1, Thomas Gross1, Oliver Rupp2, Annette Becker3. 1. Justus Liebig University, Institute of Botany, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, D-35392, Giessen, Germany. 2. Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392, Giessen, Germany. 3. Justus Liebig University, Institute of Botany, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 38, D-35392, Giessen, Germany. Annette.becker@bot1.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red clover (Trifolium pratense) is globally used as a fodder plant due its high nutritional value and soil improving qualities. In response to mowing, red clover exhibits specific morphological traits to compensate the loss of biomass. The morphological reaction is well described, but the underlying molecular mechanisms and its role for plants grown in the field are unclear. RESULTS: Here, we characterize the global transcriptional response to mowing of red clover by comparing plants grown under greenhouse conditions with plants growing on agriculturally used fields. Unexpectedly, we found that biotic and abiotic stress related changes of plants grown in the field overlay their regrowth related transcriptional changes and characterized transcription related protein families involved in these processes. Further, we can show that gibberellins, among other phytohormones, also contribute to the developmental processes related to regrowth after biomass-loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that massive biomass loss triggers less transcriptional changes in field grown plants than their struggle with biotic and abiotic stresses and that gibberellins also play a role in the developmental program related to regrowth after mowing in red clover. Our results provide first insights into the physiological and developmental processes of mowing on red clover and may serve as a base for red clover yield improvement.
BACKGROUND:Red clover (Trifolium pratense) is globally used as a fodder plant due its high nutritional value and soil improving qualities. In response to mowing, red clover exhibits specific morphological traits to compensate the loss of biomass. The morphological reaction is well described, but the underlying molecular mechanisms and its role for plants grown in the field are unclear. RESULTS: Here, we characterize the global transcriptional response to mowing of red clover by comparing plants grown under greenhouse conditions with plants growing on agriculturally used fields. Unexpectedly, we found that biotic and abiotic stress related changes of plants grown in the field overlay their regrowth related transcriptional changes and characterized transcription related protein families involved in these processes. Further, we can show that gibberellins, among other phytohormones, also contribute to the developmental processes related to regrowth after biomass-loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that massive biomass loss triggers less transcriptional changes in field grown plants than their struggle with biotic and abiotic stresses and that gibberellins also play a role in the developmental program related to regrowth after mowing in red clover. Our results provide first insights into the physiological and developmental processes of mowing on red clover and may serve as a base for red clover yield improvement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biotic and abiotic stress; Field conditions; Gibberellins; RNAseq; Red clover; Regrowth reaction; Trifolium pretense
Authors: Jeremy Schmutz; Steven B Cannon; Jessica Schlueter; Jianxin Ma; Therese Mitros; William Nelson; David L Hyten; Qijian Song; Jay J Thelen; Jianlin Cheng; Dong Xu; Uffe Hellsten; Gregory D May; Yeisoo Yu; Tetsuya Sakurai; Taishi Umezawa; Madan K Bhattacharyya; Devinder Sandhu; Babu Valliyodan; Erika Lindquist; Myron Peto; David Grant; Shengqiang Shu; David Goodstein; Kerrie Barry; Montona Futrell-Griggs; Brian Abernathy; Jianchang Du; Zhixi Tian; Liucun Zhu; Navdeep Gill; Trupti Joshi; Marc Libault; Anand Sethuraman; Xue-Cheng Zhang; Kazuo Shinozaki; Henry T Nguyen; Rod A Wing; Perry Cregan; James Specht; Jane Grimwood; Dan Rokhsar; Gary Stacey; Randy C Shoemaker; Scott A Jackson Journal: Nature Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nevin D Young; Frédéric Debellé; Giles E D Oldroyd; Rene Geurts; Steven B Cannon; Michael K Udvardi; Vagner A Benedito; Klaus F X Mayer; Jérôme Gouzy; Heiko Schoof; Yves Van de Peer; Sebastian Proost; Douglas R Cook; Blake C Meyers; Manuel Spannagl; Foo Cheung; Stéphane De Mita; Vivek Krishnakumar; Heidrun Gundlach; Shiguo Zhou; Joann Mudge; Arvind K Bharti; Jeremy D Murray; Marina A Naoumkina; Benjamin Rosen; Kevin A T Silverstein; Haibao Tang; Stephane Rombauts; Patrick X Zhao; Peng Zhou; Valérie Barbe; Philippe Bardou; Michael Bechner; Arnaud Bellec; Anne Berger; Hélène Bergès; Shelby Bidwell; Ton Bisseling; Nathalie Choisne; Arnaud Couloux; Roxanne Denny; Shweta Deshpande; Xinbin Dai; Jeff J Doyle; Anne-Marie Dudez; Andrew D Farmer; Stéphanie Fouteau; Carolien Franken; Chrystel Gibelin; John Gish; Steven Goldstein; Alvaro J González; Pamela J Green; Asis Hallab; Marijke Hartog; Axin Hua; Sean J Humphray; Dong-Hoon Jeong; Yi Jing; Anika Jöcker; Steve M Kenton; Dong-Jin Kim; Kathrin Klee; Hongshing Lai; Chunting Lang; Shaoping Lin; Simone L Macmil; Ghislaine Magdelenat; Lucy Matthews; Jamison McCorrison; Erin L Monaghan; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Fares Z Najar; Christine Nicholson; Céline Noirot; Majesta O'Bleness; Charles R Paule; Julie Poulain; Florent Prion; Baifang Qin; Chunmei Qu; Ernest F Retzel; Claire Riddle; Erika Sallet; Sylvie Samain; Nicolas Samson; Iryna Sanders; Olivier Saurat; Claude Scarpelli; Thomas Schiex; Béatrice Segurens; Andrew J Severin; D Janine Sherrier; Ruihua Shi; Sarah Sims; Susan R Singer; Senjuti Sinharoy; Lieven Sterck; Agnès Viollet; Bing-Bing Wang; Keqin Wang; Mingyi Wang; Xiaohong Wang; Jens Warfsmann; Jean Weissenbach; Doug D White; Jim D White; Graham B Wiley; Patrick Wincker; Yanbo Xing; Limei Yang; Ziyun Yao; Fu Ying; Jixian Zhai; Liping Zhou; Antoine Zuber; Jean Dénarié; Richard A Dixon; Gregory D May; David C Schwartz; Jane Rogers; Francis Quétier; Christopher D Town; Bruce A Roe Journal: Nature Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jeremy Schmutz; Phillip E McClean; Sujan Mamidi; G Albert Wu; Steven B Cannon; Jane Grimwood; Jerry Jenkins; Shengqiang Shu; Qijian Song; Carolina Chavarro; Mirayda Torres-Torres; Valerie Geffroy; Samira Mafi Moghaddam; Dongying Gao; Brian Abernathy; Kerrie Barry; Matthew Blair; Mark A Brick; Mansi Chovatia; Paul Gepts; David M Goodstein; Michael Gonzales; Uffe Hellsten; David L Hyten; Gaofeng Jia; James D Kelly; Dave Kudrna; Rian Lee; Manon M S Richard; Phillip N Miklas; Juan M Osorno; Josiane Rodrigues; Vincent Thareau; Carlos A Urrea; Mei Wang; Yeisoo Yu; Ming Zhang; Rod A Wing; Perry B Cregan; Daniel S Rokhsar; Scott A Jackson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2014-06-08 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Stefano Lonardi; María Muñoz-Amatriaín; Qihua Liang; Shengqiang Shu; Steve I Wanamaker; Sassoum Lo; Jaakko Tanskanen; Alan H Schulman; Tingting Zhu; Ming-Cheng Luo; Hind Alhakami; Rachid Ounit; Abid Md Hasan; Jerome Verdier; Philip A Roberts; Jansen R P Santos; Arsenio Ndeve; Jaroslav Doležel; Jan Vrána; Samuel A Hokin; Andrew D Farmer; Steven B Cannon; Timothy J Close Journal: Plant J Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Uday Chand Jha; Harsh Nayyar; Swarup K Parida; Melike Bakır; Eric J B von Wettberg; Kadambot H M Siddique Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 4.772