Tahnee Manning1, Arjun Venkatesh Thilagaraj2, Dmitri Mouradov3, Richard Piola4, Clare Grandison4, Matthew Gordon4, Jeff Shimeta2, Aidyn Mouradov2. 1. School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. tahnee.manning@rmit.edu.au. 2. School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Personalised Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia. 4. Maritime Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Fishermans Bend, Canberra, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dinoflagellates are a ubiquitous and ecologically important component of marine phytoplankton communities, with particularly notable species including those associated with harmful algal blooms (HABs) and those that bioluminesce. High-throughput sequencing offers a novel approach compared to traditional microscopy for determining species assemblages and distributions of dinoflagellates, which are poorly known especially in Australian waters. RESULTS: We assessed the composition of dinoflagellate assemblages in two Australian locations: coastal temperate Port Phillip Bay and offshore tropical waters of Davies Reef (Great Barrier Reef). These locations differ in certain environmental parameters reflecting latitude as well as possible anthropogenic influences. Molecular taxonomic assessment revealed more species than traditional microscopy, and it showed statistically significant differences in dinoflagellate assemblages between locations. Bioluminescent species and known associates of HABs were present at both sites. Dinoflagellates in both areas were mainly represented by the order Gymnodiniales (66%-82% of total sequence reads). In the warm waters of Davies Reef, Gymnodiniales were equally represented by the two superclades, Gymnodiniales sensu stricto (33%) and Gyrodinium (34%). In contrast, in cooler waters of Port Phillip Bay, Gymnodiniales was mainly represented by Gyrodinium (82%). In both locations, bioluminescent dinoflagellates represented up to 0.24% of the total sequence reads, with Protoperidinium the most abundant genus. HAB-related species, mainly represented by Gyrodinium, were more abundant in Port Phillip Bay (up to 47%) than at Davies Reef (28%), potentially reflecting anthropogenic influence from highly populated and industrial areas surrounding the bay. The entire assemblage of dinoflagellates, as well as the subsets of HAB and bioluminescent species, were strongly correlated with water quality parameters (R2 = 0.56-0.92). Significant predictors differed between the subsets: HAB assemblages were explained by salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and total dissolved solids; whereas, bioluminescent assemblages were explained only by salinity and dissolved oxygen, and had greater variability. CONCLUSION: High-throughput sequencing and genotyping revealed greater diversity of dinoflagellate assemblages than previously known in both subtropical and temperate Australian waters. Significant correlations of assemblage structure with environmental variables suggest the potential for explaining the distribution and composition of both HAB species and bioluminescent species.
BACKGROUND: Dinoflagellates are a ubiquitous and ecologically important component of marine phytoplankton communities, with particularly notable species including those associated with harmful algal blooms (HABs) and those that bioluminesce. High-throughput sequencing offers a novel approach compared to traditional microscopy for determining species assemblages and distributions of dinoflagellates, which are poorly known especially in Australian waters. RESULTS: We assessed the composition of dinoflagellate assemblages in two Australian locations: coastal temperate Port Phillip Bay and offshore tropical waters of Davies Reef (Great Barrier Reef). These locations differ in certain environmental parameters reflecting latitude as well as possible anthropogenic influences. Molecular taxonomic assessment revealed more species than traditional microscopy, and it showed statistically significant differences in dinoflagellate assemblages between locations. Bioluminescent species and known associates of HABs were present at both sites. Dinoflagellates in both areas were mainly represented by the order Gymnodiniales (66%-82% of total sequence reads). In the warm waters of Davies Reef, Gymnodiniales were equally represented by the two superclades, Gymnodiniales sensu stricto (33%) and Gyrodinium (34%). In contrast, in cooler waters of Port Phillip Bay, Gymnodiniales was mainly represented by Gyrodinium (82%). In both locations, bioluminescent dinoflagellates represented up to 0.24% of the total sequence reads, with Protoperidinium the most abundant genus. HAB-related species, mainly represented by Gyrodinium, were more abundant in Port Phillip Bay (up to 47%) than at Davies Reef (28%), potentially reflecting anthropogenic influence from highly populated and industrial areas surrounding the bay. The entire assemblage of dinoflagellates, as well as the subsets of HAB and bioluminescent species, were strongly correlated with water quality parameters (R2 = 0.56-0.92). Significant predictors differed between the subsets: HAB assemblages were explained by salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and total dissolved solids; whereas, bioluminescent assemblages were explained only by salinity and dissolved oxygen, and had greater variability. CONCLUSION: High-throughput sequencing and genotyping revealed greater diversity of dinoflagellate assemblages than previously known in both subtropical and temperate Australian waters. Significant correlations of assemblage structure with environmental variables suggest the potential for explaining the distribution and composition of both HAB species and bioluminescent species.
Authors: Sarah K Hu; Zhenfeng Liu; Alle A Y Lie; Peter D Countway; Diane Y Kim; Adriane C Jones; Rebecca J Gast; S Craig Cary; Evelyn B Sherr; Barry F Sherr; David A Caron Journal: J Eukaryot Microbiol Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Carlos Fajardo; Francisco Amil-Ruiz; Carlos Fuentes-Almagro; Marcos De Donato; Gonzalo Martinez-Rodriguez; Almudena Escobar-Niño; Rafael Carrasco; Juan Miguel Mancera; Francisco Javier Fernandez-Acero Journal: J Proteomics Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: R Piredda; M P Tomasino; A M D'Erchia; C Manzari; G Pesole; M Montresor; W H C F Kooistra; D Sarno; A Zingone Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 4.194
Authors: Solenn Mordret; Roberta Piredda; Daniel Vaulot; Marina Montresor; Wiebe H C F Kooistra; Diana Sarno Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 7.090
Authors: André M Comeau; Marcos G Lagunas; Karen Scarcella; Diana E Varela; Connie Lovejoy Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.792