Mahrukh M Syeda1, Jennifer M Wiggins1, Broderick C Corless1, Georgina V Long2, Keith T Flaherty3, Dirk Schadendorf4, Paul D Nathan5, Caroline Robert6, Antoni Ribas7, Michael A Davies8, Jean Jacques Grob9, Eduard Gasal10, Matthew Squires11, Mahtab Marker10, James Garrett12, Jan C Brase13, David Polsky14. 1. NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 2. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. East and North NHS Trust, Northwood, UK. 6. Institute Gustave Roussy and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France. 7. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 8. Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 9. Dermatology and Skin Cancer Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. 10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 11. Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. 12. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA. 13. Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland. 14. NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: david.polsky@nyulangone.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melanoma lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker; however, various detection methods have been used, and, to date, no large studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF, MEK, or BRAF plus MEK inhibitor therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline ctDNA concentrations and kinetics could predict survival outcomes. METHODS: In this clinical validation study, we used analytically validated droplet digital PCR assays to measure BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA in pretreatment and on-treatment plasma samples from patients aged 18 years or older enrolled in two clinical trials. COMBI-d (NCT01584648) was a double-blind, randomised phase 3 study of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib plus placebo in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. COMBI-MB (NCT02039947) was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and brain metastases. Patients in cohort A of COMBI-MB had asymptomatic brain metastases, no previous local brain-directed therapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in both trials and performed in the intention-to-treat populations in COMBI-d and COMBI-MB. We investigated the association between mutant copy number (baseline or week 4 or zero conversion status) and efficacy endpoints (progression-free survival, overall survival, and best overall response). We used Cox models, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests to explore the association of pretreatment ctDNA concentrations with progression-free survival and overall survival. The effect of additional prognostic variables such as lactate dehydrogenase was also investigated in addition to the mutant copy number. FINDINGS: In COMBI-d, pretreatment plasma samples were available from 345 (82%) of 423 patients and on-treatment (week 4) plasma samples were available from 224 (53%) of 423 patients. In cohort A of COMBI-MB, pretreatment and on-treatment samples were available from 38 (50%) of 76 patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples from 320 (93%) of 345 patients (COMBI-d) and 34 (89%) of 38 patients (COMBI-MB). When assessed as a continuous variable, elevated baseline BRAFV600 mutation-positive ctDNA concentration was associated with worse overall survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 1·09-1·18], p<0·0001 by univariate analysis), independent of treatment group and baseline lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (1·08 [1·03-1·13], p=0·0020), in COMBI-d. A ctDNA cutoff point of 64 copies per mL of plasma stratified patients enrolled in COMBI-d as high risk or low risk with respect to survival outcomes (HR 1·74 [95% CI 1·37-2·21], p<0·0001 for progression-free survival; 2·23 [1·73-2·87], p<0·0001 for overall survival) and was validated in the COMBI-MB cohort (3·20 [1·39-7·34], p=0·0047 for progression-free survival; 2·94 [1·18-7·32], p=0·016 for overall survival). In COMBI-d, undetectable ctDNA at week 4 was significantly associated with extended progression-free and overall survival, particularly in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (HR 1·99 [95% CI 1·08-3·64], p=0·027 for progression-free survival; 2·38 [1·24-4·54], p=0·0089 for overall survival). INTERPRETATION: Pretreatment and on-treatment BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA measurements could serve as independent, predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome with targeted therapy. FUNDING: Novartis.
BACKGROUND: Melanoma lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker; however, various detection methods have been used, and, to date, no large studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF, MEK, or BRAF plus MEK inhibitor therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline ctDNA concentrations and kinetics could predict survival outcomes. METHODS: In this clinical validation study, we used analytically validated droplet digital PCR assays to measure BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA in pretreatment and on-treatment plasma samples from patients aged 18 years or older enrolled in two clinical trials. COMBI-d (NCT01584648) was a double-blind, randomised phase 3 study of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib plus placebo in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. COMBI-MB (NCT02039947) was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and brain metastases. Patients in cohort A of COMBI-MB had asymptomatic brain metastases, no previous local brain-directed therapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in both trials and performed in the intention-to-treat populations in COMBI-d and COMBI-MB. We investigated the association between mutant copy number (baseline or week 4 or zero conversion status) and efficacy endpoints (progression-free survival, overall survival, and best overall response). We used Cox models, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests to explore the association of pretreatment ctDNA concentrations with progression-free survival and overall survival. The effect of additional prognostic variables such as lactate dehydrogenase was also investigated in addition to the mutant copy number. FINDINGS: In COMBI-d, pretreatment plasma samples were available from 345 (82%) of 423 patients and on-treatment (week 4) plasma samples were available from 224 (53%) of 423 patients. In cohort A of COMBI-MB, pretreatment and on-treatment samples were available from 38 (50%) of 76 patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples from 320 (93%) of 345 patients (COMBI-d) and 34 (89%) of 38 patients (COMBI-MB). When assessed as a continuous variable, elevated baseline BRAFV600 mutation-positive ctDNA concentration was associated with worse overall survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 1·09-1·18], p<0·0001 by univariate analysis), independent of treatment group and baseline lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (1·08 [1·03-1·13], p=0·0020), in COMBI-d. A ctDNA cutoff point of 64 copies per mL of plasma stratified patients enrolled in COMBI-d as high risk or low risk with respect to survival outcomes (HR 1·74 [95% CI 1·37-2·21], p<0·0001 for progression-free survival; 2·23 [1·73-2·87], p<0·0001 for overall survival) and was validated in the COMBI-MB cohort (3·20 [1·39-7·34], p=0·0047 for progression-free survival; 2·94 [1·18-7·32], p=0·016 for overall survival). In COMBI-d, undetectable ctDNA at week 4 was significantly associated with extended progression-free and overall survival, particularly in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (HR 1·99 [95% CI 1·08-3·64], p=0·027 for progression-free survival; 2·38 [1·24-4·54], p=0·0089 for overall survival). INTERPRETATION: Pretreatment and on-treatment BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA measurements could serve as independent, predictive biomarkers of clinical outcome with targeted therapy. FUNDING: Novartis.
Authors: James Larkin; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean-Jacques Grob; Piotr Rutkowski; Christopher D Lao; C Lance Cowey; Dirk Schadendorf; John Wagstaff; Reinhard Dummer; Pier F Ferrucci; Michael Smylie; David Hogg; Andrew Hill; Ivan Márquez-Rodas; John Haanen; Massimo Guidoboni; Michele Maio; Patrick Schöffski; Matteo S Carlino; Céleste Lebbé; Grant McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto; Gregory A Daniels; Georgina V Long; Lars Bastholt; Jasmine I Rizzo; Agnes Balogh; Andriy Moshyk; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: V Panasiti; M Curzio; V Roberti; P Lieto; V Devirgiliis; S Gobbi; A Naspi; R Coppola; T Lopez; N di Meo; A Gatti; G Trevisan; P Londei; S Calvieri Journal: Dermatology Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.366
Authors: Michael A Davies; Philippe Saiag; Caroline Robert; Jean-Jacques Grob; Keith T Flaherty; Ana Arance; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Luc Thomas; Thierry Lesimple; Laurent Mortier; Stergios J Moschos; David Hogg; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Michele Del Vecchio; Céleste Lebbé; Nicolas Meyer; Ying Zhang; Yingjie Huang; Bijoyesh Mookerjee; Georgina V Long Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-06-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ademi Santiago-Walker; Robert Gagnon; Jolly Mazumdar; Michelle Casey; Georgina V Long; Dirk Schadendorf; Keith Flaherty; Richard Kefford; Axel Hauschild; Patrick Hwu; Patricia Haney; Anne O'Hagan; Jennifer Carver; Vicki Goodman; Jeffrey Legos; Anne-Marie Martin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J H Lee; G V Long; S Boyd; S Lo; A M Menzies; V Tembe; A Guminski; V Jakrot; R A Scolyer; G J Mann; R F Kefford; M S Carlino; H Rizos Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Valpione; G Gremel; P Mundra; P Middlehurst; E Galvani; M R Girotti; R J Lee; G Garner; N Dhomen; P C Lorigan; R Marais Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Teofila Seremet; Yanina Jansen; Simon Planken; Hassan Njimi; Mélanie Delaunoy; Hakim El Housni; Gil Awada; Julia Katharina Schwarze; Marleen Keyaerts; Hendrik Everaert; Danielle Lienard; Véronique Del Marmol; Pierre Heimann; Bart Neyns Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Renáta Váraljai; Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht; Teofila Seremet; Joey Mark S Diaz; Jérémie Nsengimana; Antje Sucker; Klaus Griewank; Jan-Malte Placke; Peter A Horn; Nils von Neuhoff; Batool Shannan; Heike Chauvistré; Felix C E Vogel; Susanne Horn; Jürgen C Becker; Julia Newton-Bishop; Andreas Stang; Bart Neyns; Benjamin Weide; Dirk Schadendorf; Alexander Roesch Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2019-02-15
Authors: Jose Antonio Lopez-Martin; Alfonso Berrocal; Maria Gonzalez-Cao; Clara Mayo de Las Casas; Juana Oramas; Miguel A Berciano-Guerrero; Luis de la Cruz; Pablo Cerezuela; Ana Arance; Eva Muñoz-Couselo; Enrique Espinosa; Teresa Puertolas; Roberto Diaz Beveridge; Sebastian Ochenduszko; Maria-Jose Villanueva; Laura Basterretxea; Lorena Bellido; Delvys Rodriguez; Begoña Campos; Clara Montagut; Ana Drozdowskyj; Miguel A Molina Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 14.919