Literature DB >> 33587265

Removal of roosters alters the domestic phenotype and microbial and genetic profile of hens.

Hai Xiang1, Siyu Chen1, Hui Zhang2, Xu Zhu2, Dan Wang2, Huagui Liu3, Jikun Wang4, Tao Yin2, Langqing Liu2, Minghua Kong2, Jian Zhang3, Hua Li1, Simon Turner5, Xingbo Zhao6,7.   

Abstract

Hens are raised apart from roosters in modern poultry production, a substantial change from their natural social structure. We compared productivity, injuries, behavior, physiology, microbiome and transcriptome of hens housed with (R+) or without (R-) roosters to quantify the effects of this change in social structure. Hens were raised free-range from 70 to 280 days when 30 birds per treatment were assigned to battery cages until Day 315 (R+C vs. R-C), while 30 birds per treatment remained in free-range pens (R+F vs. R-F). Response to a novel environment and object, behavioral time budgets, cecum microbiome, blood composition and transcriptomic sequencing of thigh muscle and spleen were analyzed. Hens housed without roosters showed better survival, consumed less food, produced more eggs and had better feed conversion. R+F hens clustered around the rooster and were less mobile in the novel environment and object tests. R+F hens displayed the richest microbiome, and the presence of roosters resulted in differentially expressed genes related to muscle development, cellular processes, environmental information processing and immune function. Removing roosters from housed hens intensified desirable characteristics favored by domestication probably operating by deprivation of mating behavior and reduced fear, along with altered microbial and genetic function.
© 2021. Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chicken; domestic phenotype; fear; gut microbiome; rooster; transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33587265     DOI: 10.1007/s11427-020-1770-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China Life Sci        ISSN: 1674-7305            Impact factor:   6.038


  36 in total

1.  Intimal hyperplasia as a cause of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A A Giraldo; O M Esposo; J M Meis
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Stressor exposure disrupts commensal microbial populations in the intestines and leads to increased colonization by Citrobacter rodentium.

Authors:  Michael T Bailey; Scot E Dowd; Nicola M A Parry; Jeffrey D Galley; David B Schauer; Mark Lyte
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Ultrastructural changes in the developing chick liver. I. General cytology.

Authors:  R J Stephens; R F Bils
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1967-05

4.  Is domestication driven by reduced fear of humans? Boldness, metabolism and serotonin levels in divergently selected red junglefowl (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Beatrix Agnvall; Rebecca Katajamaa; Jordi Altimiras; Per Jensen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Effect of genotype and rearing system on chicken behavior and muscle fiber characteristics.

Authors:  R Branciari; C Mugnai; R Mammoli; D Miraglia; D Ranucci; A Dal Bosco; C Castellini
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) selected for low fear of humans are larger, more dominant and produce larger offspring.

Authors:  B Agnvall; A Ali; S Olby; P Jensen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Heritability and genetic correlations of fear-related behaviour in Red Junglefowl--possible implications for early domestication.

Authors:  Beatrix Agnvall; Markus Jöngren; Erling Strandberg; Per Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Domestication and tameness: brain gene expression in red junglefowl selected for less fear of humans suggests effects on reproduction and immunology.

Authors:  Johan Bélteky; Beatrix Agnvall; Martin Johnsson; Dominic Wright; Per Jensen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Differences in hindlimb morphology of ducks and chickens: effects of domestication and selection.

Authors:  Brendan M Duggan; Paul M Hocking; Tobias Schwarz; Dylan N Clements
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Specific Microbial Taxa and Functional Capacity Contribute to Chicken Abdominal Fat Deposition.

Authors:  Hai Xiang; Jiankang Gan; Daoshu Zeng; Jing Li; Hui Yu; Haiquan Zhao; Ying Yang; Shuwen Tan; Gen Li; Chaowei Luo; Zhuojun Xie; Guiping Zhao; Hua Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.