Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Representation of Women on National Institutes of Health Study Sections.

Literature DB >> 33587131

Representation of Women on National Institutes of Health Study Sections.

Anna Volerman^1,2, Vineet M Arora¹, John F Cursio³, Helen Wei⁴, Valerie G Press^1,2.

Abstract

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2021 PMID： 33587131 PMCID： PMC7885038 DOI： 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37346

Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Netw Open ISSN： 2574-3805

× No keyword cloud information.

6 in total

1. Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs.

Authors: Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus; Hong Jiang; Robin M Wagner; Walter T Schaffer; Vivian W Pinn
Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 6.893

2. Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients.

Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Rochelle DeCastro; Kent A Griffith; Soumya Rangarajan; Cristina Churchill; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel
Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 6.893

3. Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers.

Authors: Robert Sege; Linley Nykiel-Bub; Sabrina Selk
Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272

4. Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors: Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.893

5. Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.

Authors: Diego F M Oliveira; Yifang Ma; Teresa K Woodruff; Brian Uzzi
Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 56.272

6. Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.

Authors: Wairimu Magua; Xiaojin Zhu; Anupama Bhattacharya; Amarette Filut; Aaron Potvien; Renee Leatherberry; You-Geon Lee; Madeline Jens; Dastagiri Malikireddy; Molly Carnes; Anna Kaatz
Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 2.681

6 in total

4 in total

Representation of Women on National Institutes of Health Study Sections.

1. Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs.

2. Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients.

3. Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers.

4. Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

5. Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.

6. Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.

1. Gender Disparity in the Citation of Surgical Research.

2. The Women's Leadership Gap in Diabetes: A Call for Equity and Excellence.

3. Disproportionate gender representation in orthopaedics and its research.

4. Contributions of immigrants to biomedical research in the US: a personal reflection.