Literature DB >> 3358680

Ripstein procedure. Lahey Clinic experience: 1963-1985.

P L Roberts1, D J Schoetz, J A Coller, M C Veidenheimer.   

Abstract

We reviewed our 22-year experience with 135 Ripstein procedures for rectal prolapse in 118 women and 17 men. Follow-up ranged from one to 256 months (median, 41 months). Five patients were unavailable for follow-up. There was one perioperative death (0.7%). Complications included hemorrhage from presacral veins in 11 patients (8.1%), recurrent prolapse in 13 patients (9.6%), and stricture at the site of the sling in three patients (2.2%). Specific intraoperative technical factors could be related to recurrent prolapse in four patients (30.8%). Attention to technical details is mandatory to minimize immediate and long-term complications. Patients should be prepared for anterior resection, since a sling procedure may be inadvisable at the time of exploration. Resection may be the preferred operation for men, who have a high rate of recurrent prolapse with the Ripstein procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3358680     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400290036005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  10 in total

1.  Transsacral rectopexy for recurrent complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Y Araki; H Isomoto; Y Tsuzi; A Matsumoto; M Yasunaga; K Yamauchi; K Hayashi; T Kodama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Bashar Safar; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

4.  Optimizing Treatment for Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Jennifer Hrabe; Brooke Gurland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  Rectal Prolapse in Women-Outcomes of Perineal and Abdominal Approaches.

Authors:  Michal Mik; Radzislaw Trzcinski; Ryszard Kujawski; Lukasz Dziki; Marcin Tchorzewski; Adam Dziki
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  The effectiveness of perineal rectosigmoidectomy for the treatment of rectal prolapse in elderly and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Y Takesue; T Yokoyama; Y Murakami; S Akagi; H Ohge; Y Yokoyama; Y Sakashita; N Tatsumoto; K Miyamoto; Y Matsuura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Amir H Roushan; Katja Wolf; Ulrich Beutner; Jan Borovicka; Jochen Lange; Lukas Marti
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Prolapse of the rectum, long-term results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Anders T Hoel; Arne Skarstein; Kjell K Ovrebo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Sotirios Baratsis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Eung Jin Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.