Literature DB >> 33586405

Comparison of Radiochemical and Chemical Impurities in Liquid Wastes of Two Different 68Ge/68Ga Generators used in Nuclear Medicine PET Chemistry

Ayşe Uğur1, Olga Yaylalı2, Doğangün Yüksel2.   

Abstract

Objectives: Germanium-68/gallium-68 (68Ge/68Ga) generator eluate contains a number of metal cations that can compete with 68GaCl3, reducing specific radioactivity. The first step in peptide labeling with 68GaCl3 is to remove 68Ge and several other metals with a long half-life. In this purification step, the elution residue that is passed through the cartridge is collected in glass waste bottles. Waste management is included in good production practices, and in particular, the activity of long half-life 68Ge (270.95 days) and other toxic metal levels need to be examined. Our objective in this study is to determine the 68Ge activity in liquid waste produced by the generation of 68Ga and heavy metal concentrations from the generator column materials and to assess whether it can be disposed of as normal waste.
Methods: Liquid wastes produced by passing the 68Ge/68Ga generator eluate of 2 different identities via PSH+ cartridge have been analyzed with the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry device in the advanced technology application and research center of our university.
Results: The average of the 68Ge radioactive pollution was estimated to be 0.142 ppm (μg.mL-1) in the liquid waste analysis after passing through the PSH+ cartridge in the pre-elution in the GalluGEN brand generator. While there was no tin (Sn) impurity, it was determined that the average zinc (Zn) was 1.95 ppm (μg.mL-1) and the average aluminum (Al) impurity was 10.95 ppm (μg.mL-1). While no 68Ge radioactive pollution was determined in the iThemba LABS brand generator, the average Sn was 0.098 ppm (μg.mL-1), average Zn 48.6 ppm (μg.mL-1), and average Al impurity 4.135 ppm (μg.mL-1).
Conclusion: All 68Ge/68Ga generators produced have their own certificates. Metallic contamination in the postmarking waste of 68Ge/68Ga generators can be different. It would be a safe method to keep these wastes in place until they are dumped into the sewage systems, given their half-lives in terms of long half-life radioactive metallic contamination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  68Ge/68Ga generator; GMP; Gallium-68; chemical impurity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33586405      PMCID: PMC7885278          DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2020.58569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther        ISSN: 2146-1414


  8 in total

1.  Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68Ga.

Authors:  Wouter A P Breeman; Marion de Jong; Erik de Blois; Bert F Bernard; Mark Konijnenberg; Eric P Krenning
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Dose limits to the lens of the eye: International Basic Safety Standards and related guidance.

Authors:  T J Boal; M Pinak
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2015-03-10

3.  Production scale purification of Ge-68 and Zn-65 from irradiated gallium metal.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fitzsimmons; Leonard Mausner
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Past, present and future of 68Ge/68Ga generators.

Authors:  F Rösch
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  The Current Status of the Production and Supply of Gallium-68.

Authors:  Krishan Kumar
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.099

6.  GMP-compliant (68)Ga radiolabelling in a conventional small-scale radiopharmacy: a feasible approach for routine clinical use.

Authors:  Roeland Vis; Jules Lavalaye; Ewoudt Mw van de Garde
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  68Ga-Based radiopharmaceuticals: production and application relationship.

Authors:  Irina Velikyan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Reduction of 68Ge activity containing liquid waste from 68Ga PET chemistry in nuclear medicine and radiopharmacy by solidification.

Authors:  Erik de Blois; Ho Sze Chan; Kamalika Roy; Eric P Krenning; Wouter A P Breeman
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 1.371

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.