BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 25% of the global population. The standard of diagnosis, biopsy, is invasive and affected by sampling error and inter-reader variability. We hypothesized that widely available rapid MRI techniques could be used to predict nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) noninvasively by measuring liver stiffness, with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and liver fat, with chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI. Besides, we validate an automated image analysis technique to maximize the utility of these methods. PURPOSE: To implement and test an automated system for analyzing CSE-MRI and MRE data coupled with model-based prediction of NASH. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Eighty-three patients with suspected NAFLD. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 1.5 T using a flow-compensated motion-encoded gradient echo MRE sequence and a multiecho CSE-MRI sequence. ASSESSMENTS: The MRE and CSE-MRI data were analyzed by two readers (5+ and 1 years of experience) and an automated algorithm. A logistic regression model to predict pathology-diagnosed NASH was trained based on stiffness and proton density fat fraction, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated using 10-fold cross validation for models based on both automated and manual measurements. A separate model was trained to predict the NASH severity score (NAS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman, AUROC, C-statistic. RESULTS: The agreement between automated measurements and the more experienced reader (R2 = 0.87 for stiffness and R2 = 0.99 for proton density fat fraction [PDFF]) was slightly better than the agreement between readers (R2 = 0.85 and 0.98). The model for predicting biopsy-diagnosed NASH had an AUROC of 0.87. The NAS-prediction model had a C-statistic of 0.85. DATA CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a workflow that used a limited MRI acquisition protocol and fully automated analysis to predict NASH with high accuracy. These methods show promise to provide a reliable noninvasive alternative to biopsy for NASH-screening in populations with NAFLD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 25% of the global population. The standard of diagnosis, biopsy, is invasive and affected by sampling error and inter-reader variability. We hypothesized that widely available rapid MRI techniques could be used to predict nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) noninvasively by measuring liver stiffness, with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and liver fat, with chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI. Besides, we validate an automated image analysis technique to maximize the utility of these methods. PURPOSE: To implement and test an automated system for analyzing CSE-MRI and MRE data coupled with model-based prediction of NASH. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Eighty-three patients with suspected NAFLD. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 1.5 T using a flow-compensated motion-encoded gradient echo MRE sequence and a multiecho CSE-MRI sequence. ASSESSMENTS: The MRE and CSE-MRI data were analyzed by two readers (5+ and 1 years of experience) and an automated algorithm. A logistic regression model to predict pathology-diagnosed NASH was trained based on stiffness and proton density fat fraction, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated using 10-fold cross validation for models based on both automated and manual measurements. A separate model was trained to predict the NASH severity score (NAS). STATISTICAL TESTS: Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman, AUROC, C-statistic. RESULTS: The agreement between automated measurements and the more experienced reader (R2 = 0.87 for stiffness and R2 = 0.99 for proton density fat fraction [PDFF]) was slightly better than the agreement between readers (R2 = 0.85 and 0.98). The model for predicting biopsy-diagnosed NASH had an AUROC of 0.87. The NAS-prediction model had a C-statistic of 0.85. DATA CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a workflow that used a limited MRI acquisition protocol and fully automated analysis to predict NASH with high accuracy. These methods show promise to provide a reliable noninvasive alternative to biopsy for NASH-screening in populations with NAFLD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Authors: Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Rohit Loomba; Zhen Wang; Claude Sirlin; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Frank H Miller; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Edmund M Godfrey; Patrick Asbach; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Camilo A Campo; Diego Hernando; Tilman Schubert; Candice A Bookwalter; Andrew J Van Pay; Scott B Reeder Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Hyun Sik Woo; Mi Hye Yu; Ijin Joo; Eun Sun Lee; Ji Young Sohn; Kyung Boon Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Marian A Troelstra; Julia J Witjes; Anne-Marieke van Dijk; Anne L Mak; Oliver Gurney-Champion; Jurgen H Runge; Diona Zwirs; Daniela Stols-Gonçalves; Aelko H Zwinderman; Marije Ten Wolde; Houshang Monajemi; Sandjai Ramsoekh; Ralph Sinkus; Otto M van Delden; Ulrich H Beuers; Joanne Verheij; Max Nieuwdorp; Aart J Nederveen; Adriaan G Holleboom Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 5.119