Literature DB >> 33585860

Nectar biosynthesis is conserved among floral and extrafloral nectaries.

Elizabeth C Chatt1, Siti-Nabilla Mahalim1, Nur-Aziatull Mohd-Fadzil1, Rahul Roy2,3, Peter M Klinkenberg2, Harry T Horner4,5, Marshall Hampton6, Clay J Carter2, Basil J Nikolau1.   

Abstract

Nectar is a primary reward mediating plant-animal mutualisms to improve plant fitness and reproductive success. Four distinct trichomatic nectaries develop in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), one floral and three extrafloral, and the nectars they secrete serve different purposes. Floral nectar attracts bees for promoting pollination, while extrafloral nectar attracts predatory insects as a means of indirect protection from herbivores. Cotton therefore provides an ideal system for contrasting mechanisms of nectar production and nectar composition between different nectary types. Here, we report the transcriptome and ultrastructure of the four cotton nectary types throughout development and compare these with the metabolomes of secreted nectars. Integration of these datasets supports specialization among nectary types to fulfill their ecological niche, while conserving parallel coordination of the merocrine-based and eccrine-based models of nectar biosynthesis. Nectary ultrastructures indicate an abundance of rough endoplasmic reticulum positioned parallel to the cell walls and a profusion of vesicles fusing to the plasma membranes, supporting the merocrine model of nectar biosynthesis. The eccrine-based model of nectar biosynthesis is supported by global transcriptomics data, which indicate a progression from starch biosynthesis to starch degradation and sucrose biosynthesis and secretion. Moreover, our nectary global transcriptomics data provide evidence for novel metabolic processes supporting de novo biosynthesis of amino acids secreted in trace quantities in nectars. Collectively, these data demonstrate the conservation of nectar-producing models among trichomatic and extrafloral nectaries.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585860     DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the contents, functions and neonicotinoid take-up between floral and extrafloral nectar within a single species (Hemerocallis citrina Baroni).

Authors:  Hong-Xia Zhou; Richard I Milne; Peng Cui; Wen-Jing Gu; Meng-Fang Hu; Xin-Yue Liu; Yue-Qin Song; Jun Cao; Hong-Guang Zha
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Comparative analyses of the metabolite and ion concentrations in nectar, nectaries, and leaves of 36 bromeliads with different photosynthesis and pollinator types.

Authors:  Thomas Göttlinger; Gertrud Lohaus
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.627

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.