Literature DB >> 33585788

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Trends: A Single-Center Experience.

Filip Ionescu1, Nwabundo Anusim2, Eva Ma1, Lihua Qu3, LeAnn M Blankenship2, Michael Stender2, Ishmael Jaiyesimi2.   

Abstract

Recognition of the adverse events of inferior vena cava filters (VCFs) has prompted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to issue safety warnings (2010 and 2014), advocating for removal, once the risk of pulmonary embolism has abated. Despite an initial increase in retrieval rates, these remain low (25-30% at 1 year in 2014). We retrospectively investigated retrieval trends in adults with VCFs placed between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution. The rate of retrievable VCF removal accounting for the competing risk of death was the main outcome. There were 494 VCFs placed (305 retrievable). The cumulative incidence of retrieval remained low (21% at 1 year), even after the second FDA warning (2014). Patients who resumed anticoagulation (AC) at any time were more likely to have retrieval (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, p  < 0.01) and had higher retrieval rates at every time point (31.4 vs. 7.6% at 1 year). Advanced age (HR = 0.98 per year, p  = 0.004), stroke (HR = 0.28, p  = 0.028), and active malignancy (HR = 0.42, p  = 0.006) predicted nonretrieval. Device-related complications were infrequent (<1%) but thrombotic complications occurred early and were more common for nonretrieved VCFs (17 vs. 12%, p  = 0.29). Revision of guidelines to recommend active surveillance for the ability to tolerate AC in the immediate postimplantation period may improve retrieval rates. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVC filter; filter failure; practice trends; retrieval; thrombosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585788      PMCID: PMC7875678          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  TH Open        ISSN: 2512-9465


  38 in total

1.  Persistently low inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Abhisekh Mohapatra; Nathan L Liang; Rabih A Chaer; Edith Tzeng
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2018-11-12

2.  A multidisciplinary quality improvement program increases the inferior vena cava filter retrieval rate.

Authors:  John P Winters; Christopher S Morris; Chris E Holmes; Patricia Lewis; Anant D Bhave; Kenneth E Najarian; Joseph T Shields; William Charash; Mary Cushman
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Stratification of Pre-procedure Risk Factors Associated with Difficult-to-remove Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters: A 6-year Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Warren Clements; Heather K Moriarty; Eldho Paul; Gerard S Goh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Vena cava filters in unstable elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Fadi Matta
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Why optional inferior vena cava filters are not always retrieved? A real world 19 years experience in a Swiss tertiary care university hospital.

Authors:  Giacomo Buso; Adriano Alatri; Luca Calanca; Marco Fresa; Salah-Dine Qanadli; Raffaele Pesavento; Lucia Mazzolai
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.487

6.  Outcomes After Vena Cava Filter Use in Noncancer Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Richard H White; Ann Brunson; Patrick S Romano; Zhongmin Li; Ted Wun
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Impact of Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation on the Progression of Tricuspid Regurgitation and Right-Sided Heart Remodeling After Mitral-Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Jiangang Wang; Jie Han; Yan Li; Qing Ye; Fei Meng; Tiange Luo; Baiyu Tian; Haibo Zhang; Yixin Jia; Wen Zeng; Chunlei Xu; Wei Han; Yuqing Jiao; Xu Meng
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates and Factors Associated With Retrieval in a Large US Cohort.

Authors:  Joshua D Brown; Driss Raissi; Qiong Han; Val R Adams; Jeffery C Talbert
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Association of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Venous Thromboembolic Disease and a Contraindication to Anticoagulation With 30-Day Mortality.

Authors:  Tyson E Turner; Mohammed J Saeed; Eric Novak; David L Brown
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-07-06

10.  Automated Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Requests and Hematology Liaison Improves Retrieval and Reduces the Use of Temporary Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Authors:  Lara N Roberts; Thoraya Ammar; Julia Czuprynska; Roopen Arya; C Jason Wilkins
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2020-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.