Literature DB >> 33585749

Fabrication and Stabilization of Oxidized Carbon Black Nanoparticle Dispersion in Aqueous Solution for Photothermal Conversion Enhancement.

Hsiang Yi Hsieh1, Weng Tung Cheng1.   

Abstract

This study aims to explore oxidized carbon black nanoparticles (OCB-NPs) capped with an inorganic surfactant dispersed in water, as a carbon black water-based nanofluid, on photothermal conversion enhancement. We used ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectroscopy and zeta potential analyzers to identify the optimal concentration of sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) as an inorganic surfactant for OCB-NPs in order to determine the maximum value of UV-vis light absorption and absolute zeta potential. Then, the concentrations of 0.025-0.1 wt % OCB water-based nanofluid with SHMP were formulated by an ultrasonic bath for the examination of rheological behavior, thermal conductivity, and heating rate. The results indicated that the heating rate improvement of the water-based nanofluid involving 0.1 wt % OCB-capped with SHMP after irradiation by UV-vis light with wavelengths ranging from 220 to 380 nm, which is included in the solar spectrum, and an intensity of 205 W/m2 increased by approximately 66%, compared to the base fluid in the cyclic flow system. Furthermore, after a 1 month storage period, the dispersion stabilization of water-based nanofluid including 0.1 wt % OCB-capped with SHMP reached 98%, as estimated by the UV-vis spectrophotometer.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585749      PMCID: PMC7876675          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Due to specific surface area effects of inorganic nanoparticles with high thermal conductivity, enhanced convective heat transfer of nanofluids can be realized for higher efficiency and lower operating costs in the heating or cooling process.[1−3] Carbon nanomaterials are of particular interest because they are black in color, which makes them ideal for solar absorption as a result of their extremely high thermal conductivity in nanofluids.[4−6] Several carbon nanomaterials, including their crystalline[7−9] and amorphous phases,[10,11] have been developed for thermal nanofluids. Sani et al.[12] studied the graphite/nanodiamond suspension in ethylene glycol (EG) for solar direct absorbance collector (SDAC) and solar vapor generation. Thermal conductivity, rheological behavior, and surface tension of EG-based nanofluids containing titanium nitride (TiN) with various sizes of particles were experimentally explored to fill reliable and universal theoretical relationships for thermophysical properties of nanofluids. Recently, Tam et al.[13] conducted a survey of using carbon nanotube and graphene water-based nanofluids for direct thermal absorption. They summarized some significantly enhancement of these nanofluids for SDAC, which depends on the type of nanoparticle suspension and the base fluid, the particle volume fraction, the size and shape of the nanoparticles, and the temperature. In order to raise economic benefit and reduce environmental pollution, the research and development of carbon black nanoparticles dispersed in aqueous solution as a water-based nanofluid are essential topic for photothermal conversion. The dispersion of carbon black nanoparticles in water presented difficulties, including wetting, dispersion, and stabilization, leading to serious disadvantages in the practical applications.[14] As a result, how to overcome these difficulties are very important study issues. Surfactants can improve the stability of inorganic nanoparticle dispersion in aqueous solution; however, some concerns, such as contamination, foaming, and loss of thermal properties, can reduce nanofluid performance.[15,16] Surface functionalization of an organic surfactant-free approach can deliver long-term nanofluid stability without the problems normally associated with organic-based surfactants,[17] whereas it limits the working temperature of nanofluid as organic compounds can degrade at higher temperatures. As a result, mechanical/chemical reaction techniques were used to deposit hydrophilic functional groups onto carbon nanotubes to prevent aggregation in aqueous solution,[18] and an organic surfactant-free technique was used to deposit hydroxyl groups onto double- and single-walled carbon nanotubes.[19] Furthermore, in the case of carbon nanotube water-based photothermal fluids, the surface hydroxyl groups were found to disperse both double- and single-walled carbon nanotubes in water to promote nanofluid stability.[20] Polar groups have been found to improve the dispersion properties of carbon nanotubes in water. XPS spectrum of OCB with SHMP. FT-IR spectra of OCB (a) without and (b) with SHMP. The stabilization of nanoparticle dispersion in aqueous solution can be quantitatively measured by the electrical potential between the dispersion medium and the stationary fluid layer attached to the particle.[21] The electrical potential was defined as the zeta potential and indicated the degree of repulsion between charged particles dispersed in the fluid. A high zeta potential infers strong Coulomb repulsion forces between the dispersed particles and smaller attractive van der Waals forces. Nanofluids with a higher absolute value of zeta potential were considered to be a stable state, whereas nanofluids with a lower absolute value of zeta potential will undergo nanoparticle clustering and sedimentation. Generally, nanofluids with zeta potentials between 40 and 60 mV in absolute values were considered to have good stability, and those with zeta potentials greater than an absolute value of 60 mV were considered to have excellent stability.[22] UV–vis absorbance spectra for 0.025 wt % OCB in water with different amounts of 0.005 M SHMP. TEM images of OCB dispersion in the base fluid (a) without and (b) with 10 vol % SHMP (0.005 M) in a dried form. For applications in solar energy, nanofluids offer several attractive and beneficial photothermal properties that can enhance the performance of direct-absorption solar thermal collectors.[23] In particular, thermal conductivity enhancements of nanofluids have encouraged many researchers to evaluate their performance in direct absorption solar thermal collectors.[24] However, investigators have also pointed out a number of factors that hinder the long-term stability and viability of nanofluids for practical use in solar thermal applications.[25] Furthermore, the addition of organic surfactants and additives to alleviate nanoparticle clustering, agglomeration, and precipitation over time will alter the physical properties of the nanofluid.[26] For example, increasing the concentration of surfactant will increase nanofluid viscosity and produce larger pressure drops throughout the collector system, inducing larger demands for pumping power to circulate the working fluid. As reviewed from the literature above, the addition of organic surfactants can prevent clustering and precipitation, but their use might have a detrimental impact on nanofluid properties involving viscosity and thermal conductivity. Therefore, our study intends to select the inorganic surfactant that can work in high-temperature situations for stabilizing the dispersion of OCB-NPs in water. We begin by using UV–vis absorption spectroscopy and zeta potential analyzers to identify the optimal amount of sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) as an inorganic surfactant for the dispersion of OCB-NPs in water to the maximum value of UV–vis light absorption and absolute zeta potential; then, the different concentrations of carbon black water-based nanofluids in the presence of SHMP are formulated by an ultrasonic bath. Finally, the resultant nanofluids will be characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy, natural sedimentation, rheology analysis, transmission electron microscopy, transient hot wire method, and thermal energy conversion to determine the optimal ratio of inorganic surfactant to CB-NPs, stability, and rheology behavior, as well as particle size distribution and photothermal conversion enhancement.

Results and Discussion

Modification of Oxide Carbon Black

Choi et al.[27] indicated that the main forms of SHMP were linear condensed phosphates (NaPO3) that would degrade into lower phosphates in aqueous solutions. XPS measurement provided information about the presence of chemical elements and bonds for understanding the interfacial reaction between the surface of oxidized carbon black (OCB) and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) O surfactant. As seen from the XPS spectra in Figure , typical XPS O 1s (285 eV) and C 1s (531 eV) spectra were obtained for OCB with SHMP, and it also showed O KLL (977 eV) spectra, which can be attributed to the surface oxidation of carbon black and the oxygen element provided by the phosphate ion. Furthermore, the P 2p (130 eV) and P 2s (187 eV) spectra were attributed to phosphorus, which means that the phosphate ion affected the carbon black and formed chemical bonds on the carbon black surface.
Figure 1

XPS spectrum of OCB with SHMP.

For further validation, FT-IR analysis was carried out for the surface compositions of samples. As shown in Figure , the peak at approximately 1200–1300 cm–1 was C–O, and the peak at approximately 1720–1800 cm–1 was C=O, indicating that the surface of the OCB has oxygen-bonded groups. In addition, the infrared spectrum of phosphate shows a very strong and broad band on carbon black, appearing at 1120–940 and 550 cm–1, respectively.
Figure 2

FT-IR spectra of OCB (a) without and (b) with SHMP.

UV–vis analysis can also be used to show the effect of different SHMP concentrations on light absorption of carbon black nanofluid. As displayed in Figure , with an increasing amount of SHMP, the light absorption of carbon nanofluid increased until it reached a maximum value, responding to the optimal amount of 10 vol % SHMP (0.005 M) for 0.025 wt % CB-NP dispersion in water. This is because the excessive amount of SHMP brought out too much charge on the surface of the particles, causing the electric double layer to be compressed and the potential to decrease, inducing the van der Waals force between the particles to overcome the electrostatic repulsion, so that the particles would easily aggregate in the suspension, reducing light absorption of the species during UV–vis measurement.
Figure 3

UV–vis absorbance spectra for 0.025 wt % OCB in water with different amounts of 0.005 M SHMP.

In addition, according to Beer’s law,[28]where A indicates light absorbance, T expresses light transmittance, I0 and I are intensities of incident light and transmitting light, respectively, l represents the width of a sample cell (0.001 m), and C represents the concentration of OCB in base fluid (0.0025 g/dm3). At a wavelength of 400 nm, the extinction coefficient (α) of carbon black nanofluid was significantly increased from 267.6 to 552.4 dm3/(m·g) as OCB was capped with SHMP. This suggests that the addition of an appropriate amount of the surfactant can effectively increase the light-absorbing ability of the carbon black nanofluid due to well dispersed OCB-NPs in the base fluid.

Stabilization of Carbon Black Nanofluid

The primary particle size of carbon black is approximately 20 nm; however, since the surface energy between the particles is large, it makes the particles tend to aggregate, forming secondary particles, called as the secondary particle size. The effect of ionic surfactant on the average secondary particle size of OCB was measured by TEM (Figure ). As estimated from the figure, the average secondary particle size of OCB capped with SHMP was 25.67 nm, which was evidently smaller than 124.10 nm of OCB without modified with SHMP. In addition, we applied a zeta potential analyzer to measure the surface potential of OCB dispersion in water with different concentrations of SHMP. As shown in Figure a, the absolute zeta potential clearly increased with increased surfactant, reaching a maximum negative value of −67.55 mV with the addition of 10 vol % SHMP (0.005 M) in water containing 0.025 wt % OCB, which means that the absolute value of the interface potential is the highest, leading to excellent stability of CB-NP dispersion in base fluid with an optimal amount of surfactant. Additionally, Figure b shows that the zeta potential of 0.025 wt % OCB in water with 10 vol% SHMP (0.005 M) varied according to the pH value. The absolute zeta potential was found to increase substantially with the increasing pH value, reaching a maximum value of −78.53 mV at pH 8.45, which results from OH– ions in the alkaline liquid also adsorbing to the surface of OCB, thereby increasing the negative zeta potential.
Figure 4

TEM images of OCB dispersion in the base fluid (a) without and (b) with 10 vol % SHMP (0.005 M) in a dried form.

Figure 5

Variation of the zeta potential of the OCB nanofluid with (a) an amount of 0.005 M SHMP and (b) a pH value of the solution.

Variation of the zeta potential of the OCB nanofluid with (a) an amount of 0.005 M SHMP and (b) a pH value of the solution. Furthermore, we used the natural sedimentation method and UV–vis absorption spectroscopy to quantify the amount of OCB particles suspended in a liquid after standing for a period of time. As illustrated in Figure , after storage for 30 days, the normalized light absorbances of OCB dispersion in water with and without SHMP can be used to confirm that the OCB-NPs have 85.82 and 97.83%, respectively, in liquid compared to the original suspension solution. This suggests that the inorganic surfactant can significantly enhance the stabilization of oxidized carbon black nanofluid. According to the optimal ratio of OCB to SHMP, we increased the concentration of OCB from 0.025 to 0.1 wt % in water to confirm whether the higher concentration affects the stability of the dispersion. As shown in Figure , no difference in the zeta potential was found, indicating that the oxidized carbon black water-based nanofluid remained in a very stable state due to the effect of the inorganic surfactant.
Figure 6

Dispersion stabilization for (a) OCB and (b) OCB/SHMP dispersion in water.

Figure 7

Zeta potential of the water-based nanofluid with different concentrations of OCB in the presence of SHMP.

Dispersion stabilization for (a) OCB and (b) OCB/SHMP dispersion in water. Zeta potential of the water-based nanofluid with different concentrations of OCB in the presence of SHMP.

Thermophysical Properties

Viscosity

In DASC, nanofluid was circulated flowing inside a glass tube, where the nanofluid absorbs heat from irradiation, and then it conveyed the absorbed heat to the cold water through a heat exchanger.[24] Therefore, the viscosity of the as-prepared nanofluid was measured to evaluate the effect the wall surface friction force of tube in this work. As shown in Figure a, as the concentration of carbon black was increased from 0.025 to 0.1 wt %, the viscosity of nanofluid was raised from 1.05 to 1.09 cp, indicating that the concentration of carbon black increased by four times, but the increase of viscosity was only 4.31%; and as-prepared carbon black water-based nanofluid belonged a shear thinning fluid, as exhibited in Figure b, meaning that the dispersed nanoparticles would not be aggregated during the flowing state, which in turn will facilitated for the practical application.
Figure 8

Viscosity of the water-based nanofluid with different (a) concentrations of OCB in the present of SHMP surfactant and (b) angular speeds under a specified temperature of 298 K controlled by cyclic cooling water.

Viscosity of the water-based nanofluid with different (a) concentrations of OCB in the present of SHMP surfactant and (b) angular speeds under a specified temperature of 298 K controlled by cyclic cooling water.

Thermal Conductivity

The thermal conductivity of a nanofluid is mainly influenced by the number, size, and material properties of solid nanoparticles and the carrier fluid. In this study, the thermal conductivity of water-based nanofluid with different concentrations of OCB capped with SHMP was measured by transient hot wire method at 298 K controlled by cyclic cooling water. As analyzed from the results in Figure , the addition of OCB capped with ionic surfactant in the base fluid would indeed increase thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity of as-prepared nanofluid would rise from 0.592 (W/m·K) to 0.606 (W/m·K) when the 0.1 wt % OCB is added into the water-based nanofluid in the presence of SHMP.
Figure 9

Thermal conductivity of the water-based nanofluid with different concentrations of OCB in the presence of SHMP.

Thermal conductivity of the water-based nanofluid with different concentrations of OCB in the presence of SHMP.

Heating Rate Improvement

For evaluation of photothermal conversion enhancement of oxidized carbon black water-based nanofluid, we applied the Newton’s law of cooling,[29]where Q indicates the intensity of light radiation, A expresses the cross-sectional area, h is the heat transfer coefficient of forced convection, and ΔT is the temperature difference of the nanofluid between the initial state and during cyclic flow periods. In this work, Q and A are specified so that the heat transfer coefficient of forced convection, which are functions of fluid properties and velocity, could be in terms of temperature difference between the initial state and during cyclic flow periods of oxidized carbon black water-based nanofluid. In order to further understand photothermal conversion enhancement, we carried out the light absorption measurement of the as-fabricated nanofluid affected by different concentrations of the OCB and flow rate in a cyclic flow system with a setup equipped with an ultraviolet irradiation device. As demonstrated in Figure , the temperature difference between the initial state and during irradiation by UV–vis light with wavelengths ranging from 220 to 380 nm, which is involved in the solar spectrum, and an intensity of 205 W/m2 was found to significantly enlarge with an increasing flow rate [(a) 40, (b) 80, and (c) 160 mL/min] of water-based nanofluid with amounts of OCB and SHMP in the cyclic flow system. This is because the uniform dispersion of OCB nanoparticles due to the capping agent in flowing base fluid can enhance the light absorption of nanofluids during irradiation by UV–vis light.
Figure 10

Temperature difference between the initial state and during cyclic flow periods enlarging with the increasing flow rate of water-based nanofluid with amounts of OCB and SHMP at (a) 40, (b) 80, and (c) 160 mL/min, as well as irradiating time of UV–vis light with wavelengths ranging from 220 to 380 nm and an intensity of 205 W/m2.

Temperature difference between the initial state and during cyclic flow periods enlarging with the increasing flow rate of water-based nanofluid with amounts of OCB and SHMP at (a) 40, (b) 80, and (c) 160 mL/min, as well as irradiating time of UV–vis light with wavelengths ranging from 220 to 380 nm and an intensity of 205 W/m2. According to the experimental results above, at a steady state and the temperature difference from the initial state of water-based nanofluid being the datum, the heating rate improvement was defined as the temperature difference from the initial state of the OCB nanofluid subtracted by the datum and then divided by the datum. Table lists a summary of heating rate improvement for water-based nanofluid with different amounts of OCB and SHMP under three flow rates of 40, 80, and 160 mL/min, respectively. As shown in the table, particularly, the heat rate improvement could reach 66.67% when the water-based fluid slightly added by 0.1 wt % OCB nanoparticles capped with SHMP was irradiated by UV–vis light for 25 min at a flow rate of 160 mL/min, which is induced by a specific area effect of carbon black nanoparticles and forced convection.
Table 1

Heating Rate Improvement of Carbon Black Water-Based Nanofluid Varying with Different Flow Rates and Compositions

flow rate (mL/min)sample compositionheating rate improvement (%)
40Di-water0
 Di-water/OCB-0.025 wt %9.95
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.025 wt %17.60
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.050 wt %21.43
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.1 wt %34.95
80Di-water0
 Di-water/OCB-0.025 wt %23.89
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.025 wt %37.71
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.050 wt %47.07
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.1 wt %60.66
160Di-water0
 Di-water/OCB-0.025 wt %28.95
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.025 wt %41.89
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.050 wt %48.25
 Di-water/SHMP/OCB-0.1 wt %66.67

Conclusions

In this work, the surface of CB-NPs was first modified through oxidation and then capped with inorganic surfactant, followed by dispersal in water-based fluid via an ultrasonic bath, thereby becoming an oxidized carbon black water-based nanofluid. The zeta potential of the aqueous solution with 0.025 wt % OCB nanoparticle and 10 vol % SHMP (0.005 M) reached a maximum negative value of −78.53 mV at a pH of 8.45, exhibiting excellent stabilization of suspension. In addition, in the photothermal conversion of the cyclic flowing system, the heating rate improvement of as-fabricated nanofluid (0.1 wt % OCB) increased by approximately 67%, but its viscosity increased only slightly (4%) relative to the base fluid.

Experimental Section

Materials

Carbon black nanopowder with a sphere-like particle and a mean primary particle size of 14 nm, trademarked by Monarch 1100, was purchased from Cabot Co. and oxidized into oxidized carbon black (OCB) in order to be compatible with water.[30] Deionized water (18.1Ω) was used as a base fluid. Sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich was used as an inorganic surfactant.

Sample Preparation

To determine the optimal amount of inorganic surfactant for dispersion stabilization of the water-based nanofluid, 5 mg of OCB was dispersed in 25 mL deionized water with different amounts of 0.005 M SHMP (0, 5, 10, and 15 vol %) by an ultrasonic bath (Branson 3510, 40 kHz, 143 W) for 15 min under ambient temperature controlled by recycle cooling water. To investigate the rheological behavior, thermal conductivity, and heating rate improvement of the water-based nanofluid, at room temperature, the nanofluids with different concentrations (0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 wt %) of OCB in the presence of SHMP were created by ultrasonic bath dispersion for 60 min.

Characterization

To analyze the optimal conditions of the addition of SHMP, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out on a PHI 5000 Versa Probe X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (ULVAC-PHI) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR; FT-720) spectroscopy was performed and scanned over the range of 400–4000 cm–1. UV–vis spectroscopy data were collected with a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer, and samples were contained in 1 mL quartz cuvettes. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed with a JEOL JSM-7800F scanning electron microscope. Zeta potential analysis was performed with a Nano Brook Zeta PALS. The viscosity was recorded by a rheometer on a programmable DV-II+Pro viscometer, and thermal conductivity was recorded on a Decagon KD2 Pro device. The measurements of viscosity and thermal conductivity both are repeated three times based on operating procedures from the manuals of the DV-II+Pro and KD2 Pro, respectively, in which the equipment are sketched in Figures and 12. Ultraviolet visible light source (EXFO Acticure A4000) with wavelengths ranging from 220 to 380 nm, which is included in the solar spectrum, and an intensity of 205 W/m2 was applied to radiate the as-prepared nanofluid in the cyclic flow system under ambient temperature in a closed cabinet.
Figure 11

(a) Schematic diagram for measuring the viscosity of the sample and (b) nomenclature in this study.

Figure 12

Schematic diagram for measuring the thermal conductivity of the sample in this study.

(a) Schematic diagram for measuring the viscosity of the sample and (b) nomenclature in this study. Schematic diagram for measuring the thermal conductivity of the sample in this study.
  6 in total

1.  Experimental observation of an extremely dark material made by a low-density nanotube array.

Authors:  Zu-Po Yang; Lijie Ci; James A Bur; Shawn-Yu Lin; Pulickel M Ajayan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Thermal properties of carbon black aqueous nanofluids for solar absorption.

Authors:  Dongxiao Han; Zhaoguo Meng; Daxiong Wu; Canying Zhang; Haitao Zhu
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.703

3.  Nanotubols under H2O2 exposure: is it possible to poly-hydroxylate carbon nanotubes?

Authors:  J Vicente-Santiago; J Cornejo-Jacob; D Valdez-Pérez; J Ruiz-García; R A Guirado-López
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 4.  Carbon Nanomaterial-Based Nanofluids for Direct Thermal Solar Absorption.

Authors:  Nguyen Trong Tam; Nguyen Viet Phuong; Phan Hong Khoi; Phan Ngoc Minh; Masoud Afrand; Pham Van Trinh; Bui Hung Thang; Gaweł Żyła; Patrice Estellé
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Current research aspects in mono and hybrid nanofluid based heat pipe technologies.

Authors:  Rakesh K Bumataria; N K Chavda; Hitesh Panchal
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-23

Review 6.  Nanofluid Types, Their Synthesis, Properties and Incorporation in Direct Solar Thermal Collectors: A Review.

Authors:  Wisut Chamsa-Ard; Sridevi Brundavanam; Chun Che Fung; Derek Fawcett; Gerrard Poinern
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.076

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.