BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the standard treatments of choice for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Herein, we aimed to analyze MM patients at our center and compare the clinical outcomes of single and double ASCT patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having MM and had undergone single or double ASCT in our clinic between the years 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: In this study, the median time of second ASCT is approximately 3.6 years from the first ASCT. Overall survival (OS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 4,011 ± 266 vs 3,526 ± 326 days, respectively (p: 0.33). Progression-free survival (PFS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 2,344 ± 228 vs 685 ± 120 days, respectively (p: 0.22). Disease assessment after ASCT stable or progressive disease, partial remission, and very good partial or complete remission (CR) in single and double ASCT groups was 62/44/105 and 8/4/5, respectively (p: 0.22). CONCLUSION: The present study points out that the second ASCT treatment option for MM patients may not be effective as suggested, especially in the era of novel MM drugs, since our results come from the past data that novel drugs were not exist. In conclusion, we found no benefit with second ASCT in MM patients in terms of PFS and OS or CR rates, and the novel anti-myeloma drugs might decrease the need for a second transplant.
BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the standard treatments of choice for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Herein, we aimed to analyze MM patients at our center and compare the clinical outcomes of single and double ASCT patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having MM and had undergone single or double ASCT in our clinic between the years 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: In this study, the median time of second ASCT is approximately 3.6 years from the first ASCT. Overall survival (OS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 4,011 ± 266 vs 3,526 ± 326 days, respectively (p: 0.33). Progression-free survival (PFS) duration of the single and double transplanted groups was 2,344 ± 228 vs 685 ± 120 days, respectively (p: 0.22). Disease assessment after ASCT stable or progressive disease, partial remission, and very good partial or complete remission (CR) in single and double ASCT groups was 62/44/105 and 8/4/5, respectively (p: 0.22). CONCLUSION: The present study points out that the second ASCT treatment option for MM patients may not be effective as suggested, especially in the era of novel MM drugs, since our results come from the past data that novel drugs were not exist. In conclusion, we found no benefit with second ASCT in MM patients in terms of PFS and OS or CR rates, and the novel anti-myeloma drugs might decrease the need for a second transplant.
Authors: Laurent Garderet; Simona Iacobelli; Linda Koster; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jan-Erik Johansson; Jean Henri Bourhis; Marta Krejci; Xavier Leleu; Michael Potter; Didier Blaise; Christian Koenecke; Christian Peschel; Jakub Radocha; Bernd Metzner; Pascal Lenain; Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart; David Pohlreich; Mariella Grasso; Denis Caillot; Herman Einsele; Marco Ladetto; Stefan Schönland; Nicolaus Kröger Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Shivaprasad Manjappa; Mark A Fiala; Justin King; Daniel A Kohnen; Ravi Vij Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Leopold Sellner; Christiane Heiss; Axel Benner; Marc S Raab; Jens Hillengass; Dirk Hose; Nicola Lehners; Gerlinde Egerer; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kai Neben Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Francesca Elice; Roberto Raimondi; Alberto Tosetto; Anna D'Emilio; Eros Di Bona; Andrea Piccin; Francesco Rodeghiero Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Laura C Michaelis; Ayman Saad; Xiaobo Zhong; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Cesar O Freytes; David I Marks; Hillard M Lazarus; Jennifer M Bird; Leona Holmberg; Rammurti T Kamble; Shaji Kumar; Michael Lill; Kenneth R Meehan; Wael Saber; Jeffrey Schriber; Jason Tay; Dan T Vogl; Baldeep Wirk; Bipin N Savani; Robert P Gale; David H Vesole; Gary J Schiller; Muneer Abidi; Kenneth C Anderson; Taiga Nishihori; Matt E Kalaycio; Julie M Vose; Jan S Moreb; William Drobyski; Reinhold Munker; Vivek Roy; Armin Ghobadi; H Kent Holland; Rajneesh Nath; L Bik To; Angelo Maiolino; Adetola A Kassim; Sergio A Giralt; Heather Landau; Harry C Schouten; Richard T Maziarz; Joseph Mikhael; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Patrick J Stiff; John Gibson; Sagar Lonial; Amrita Krishnan; Angela Dispenzieri; Parameswaran Hari Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: M Attal; J L Harousseau; A M Stoppa; J J Sotto; J G Fuzibet; J F Rossi; P Casassus; H Maisonneuve; T Facon; N Ifrah; C Payen; R Bataille Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hartmut Goldschmidt; Marc-Andrea Baertsch; Jana Schlenzka; Natalia Becker; Christina Habermehl; Thomas Hielscher; Marc-Steffen Raab; Jens Hillengass; Sandra Sauer; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Steffen Luntz; Anna Jauch; Dirk Hose; Anja Seckinger; Peter Brossart; Martin Goerner; Stefan Klein; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Peter Reimer; Ullrich Graeven; Roland Fenk; Mathias Haenel; Hans Martin; Hans W Lindemann; Christoph Scheid; Axel Nogai; Hans Salwender; Richard Noppeney; Britta Besemer; Katja Weisel Journal: Leukemia Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: H-Y Yhim; K Kim; J S Kim; H J Kang; J-A Kim; C-K Min; S H Bae; E Park; D-H Yang; C Suh; M K Kim; Y-C Mun; H S Eom; H J Shin; H-J Yoon; J H Kwon; J H Lee; Y S Kim; S-S Yoon; J-Y Kwak Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Gordon Cook; Cathy Williams; Julia M Brown; David A Cairns; Jamie Cavenagh; John A Snowden; A John Ashcroft; Marie Fletcher; Chris Parrish; Kwee Yong; Jim Cavet; Hanna Hunter; Jenny M Bird; Anna Chalmers; Sheila O'Connor; Mark T Drayson; Treen C M Morris Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 41.316