Literature DB >> 33585550

Accessing 3D Printed Vascular Phantoms for Procedural Simulation.

Jasamine Coles-Black1,2, Damien Bolton2, Jason Chuen1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction: 3D printed patient-specific vascular phantoms provide superior anatomical insights for simulating complex endovascular procedures. Currently, lack of exposure to the technology poses a barrier for adoption. We offer an accessible, low-cost guide to producing vascular anatomical models using routine CT angiography, open source software packages and a variety of 3D printing technologies.
Methods: Although applicable to all vascular territories, we illustrate our methodology using Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAAs) due to the strong interest in this area. CT aortograms acquired as part of routine care were converted to representative patient-specific 3D models, and then printed using a variety of 3D printing technologies to assess their material suitability as aortic phantoms. Depending on the technology, phantoms cost $20-$1,000 and were produced in 12-48 h. This technique was used to generate hollow 3D printed thoracoabdominal aortas visible under fluoroscopy.
Results: 3D printed AAA phantoms were a valuable addition to standard CT angiogram reconstructions in the simulation of complex cases, such as short or very angulated necks, or for positioning fenestrations in juxtarenal aneurysms. Hollow flexible models were particularly useful for device selection and in planning of fenestrated EVAR. In addition, these models have demonstrated utility other settings, such as patient education and engagement, and trainee and anatomical education. Further study is required to establish a material with optimal cost, haptic and fluoroscopic fidelity.
Conclusion: We share our experiences and methodology for developing inexpensive 3D printed vascular phantoms which despite material limitations, successfully mimic the procedural challenges encountered during live endovascular surgery. As the technology continues to improve, 3D printed vascular phantoms have the potential to disrupt how endovascular procedures are planned and taught.
Copyright © 2021 Coles-Black, Bolton and Chuen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; AAA (abdominal aortic aneurysm); EVAR; FEVAR; angiography; fluoroscopy; simulation; vascular phantom

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585550      PMCID: PMC7873568          DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.626212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Surg        ISSN: 2296-875X


  45 in total

1.  Producing a full-scale model from computed tomographic data with the rapid prototyping technique using the binder jet method: a comparison with the laser lithography method using a dry skull.

Authors:  I Ono; K Abe; S Shiotani; Y Hirayama
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; E M Ritter; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Customised 3D Printing: An Innovative Training Tool for the Next Generation of Orbital Surgeons.

Authors:  Richard L Scawn; Alex Foster; Bradford W Lee; Don O Kikkawa; Bobby S Korn
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2015-06-29

5.  Effectiveness of 3D printed models in the treatment of complex aortic diseases.

Authors:  Enrico M Marone; Ferdinando Auricchio; Stefania Marconi; Michele Conti; Luigi F Rinaldi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Angelo Argenteri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.888

6.  Three-dimensional printing in medicine.

Authors:  Jasamine Coles-Black; Ian Chao; Jason Chuen
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Fabrication of extended-release patient-tailored prednisolone tablets via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing.

Authors:  Justyna Skowyra; Katarzyna Pietrzak; Mohamed A Alhnan
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 8.  Role of dual energy CT to improve diagnosis of non-traumatic abdominal vascular emergencies.

Authors:  Khalid W Shaqdan; Anushri Parakh; Avinash R Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-02

9.  Accuracy of upper jaw positioning with intermediate splint fabrication after virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Heinz-Theo Luebbers; Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Serge Schepers; Luc Vrielinck; Ivo Lambrichts; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  On the optimization of low-cost FDM 3D printers for accurate replication of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Michael Chung; Norbert Radacsi; Colin Robert; Edward D McCarthy; Anthony Callanan; Noel Conlisk; Peter R Hoskins; Vasileios Koutsos
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2018-01-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient-specific brain arteries molded as a flexible phantom model using 3D printed water-soluble resin.

Authors:  Daniel P G Nilsson; Madelene Holmgren; Petter Holmlund; Anders Wåhlin; Anders Eklund; Tobias Dahlberg; Krister Wiklund; Magnus Andersson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Commentary: Accessing 3D Printed Vascular Phantoms for Procedural Simulation.

Authors:  Som P Singh; Fahad M Qureshi; Farhan Baig
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Case report: Application of three-dimensional technologies for surgical treatment of portosystemic shunt with segmental caudal vena cava aplasia in two dogs.

Authors:  Jinsu Kang; Myungryul Yang; Yonghwan Kwon; Chorok Jeong; Namsoo Kim; Suyoung Heo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-12

4.  RF Remote Blood Glucose Sensor and a Microfluidic Vascular Phantom for Sensor Validation.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan Affendi Mohamad Yunos; Rémi Manczak; Cyril Guines; Ahmad Fairuzabadi Mohd Mansor; Wing Cheung Mak; Sheroz Khan; Noor Amalina Ramli; Arnaud Pothier; Anis Nurashikin Nordin
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03

5.  Development of Custom Wall-Less Cardiovascular Flow Phantoms with Tissue-Mimicking Gel.

Authors:  Megan E Laughlin; Sam E Stephens; Jamie A Hestekin; Morten O Jensen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.495

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.