Jana Halamkova1,2,3, Tomas Kazda4,5, Lucie Pehalova6,7, Roman Gonec8, Sarka Kozakova8, Lucia Bohovicova1, Ondrej Slaby1,2,9, Regina Demlova10,11, Marek Svoboda1,2, Igor Kiss1,2. 1. Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia. 2. Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 3. Department of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 6. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia. 7. Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 8. Department of Pharmacy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia. 9. Central European Institute of Technology, Molecular Oncology II-Solid Cancer, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 10. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. 11. Clinical Trial Unit, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: All colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). The association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the risk of cancer is well known. However, the role of DM and its therapy in the development of SPMs in CRC patients is not well described. METHODS: In this single-institutional retrospective analysis we identified 1,174 colorectal carcinoma patients, median follow-up 10.1 years, (median age 63 years, 724 men). All patients over 18 years with histologically confirmed CRC who were admitted in the period 1.1. 2003- 31.12.2013 and followed-up till 31.12. 2018 at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (MMCI) were screened for eligibility. The exclusion criteria were CRC diagnosed at autopsy, lost to follow-up and high risk of development of SPMs due to hereditary cancer syndrome. Tumours are considered multiple primary malignancies if arising in different sites and/or are of a different histology or morphology group. Comparisons of the basic characteristics between the patients with SPM and the patients without SPM were performed as well as comparison of the occurrence of SPMs by the site of diagnosis between the DM and non-DM cohorts and survival analyses. RESULTS: A SPM was diagnosed in 234 (20%) patients, DM in 183 (15%) patients. DM was diagnosed in 22.6% of those with SPM vs. in 13.8% of those without SPM (p=0.001). The most common types of SPMs in DM patients were other CRC, kidney, lung, bladder and nonmelanoma skin cancer, but only carcinoma of the liver and bile duct tracts was significantly more common than in the group without DM. Although breast cancer was the second most common in the group with DM, its incidence was lower than in the group without DM, as well as prostate cancer. A significantly higher incidence of SPMs was found in older CRC patients (≥ 65 years) and in those with lower stage colon cancer and DM. No significant difference in DM treatment between those with and without a SPM was observed including analysis of type of insulin. CONCLUSION: CRC patients with diabetes mellitus, especially those with older age, and early stages of colon cancer, should be screened for second primary malignancies more often than the standard population. Patients without DM have longer survival. According to the occurrence of the most common second malignancies, a clinical examination, blood count, and ultrasound of the abdomen is appropriate, together with standard breast and colorectal cancer screening, and lung cancer screening under certain conditions, and should be recommended in CRC survivors especially in patients with intercurrent DM, however the necessary frequency of screening remains unclear.
INTRODUCTION: All colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). The association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the risk of cancer is well known. However, the role of DM and its therapy in the development of SPMs in CRC patients is not well described. METHODS: In this single-institutional retrospective analysis we identified 1,174 colorectal carcinoma patients, median follow-up 10.1 years, (median age 63 years, 724 men). All patients over 18 years with histologically confirmed CRC who were admitted in the period 1.1. 2003- 31.12.2013 and followed-up till 31.12. 2018 at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (MMCI) were screened for eligibility. The exclusion criteria were CRC diagnosed at autopsy, lost to follow-up and high risk of development of SPMs due to hereditary cancer syndrome. Tumours are considered multiple primary malignancies if arising in different sites and/or are of a different histology or morphology group. Comparisons of the basic characteristics between the patients with SPM and the patients without SPM were performed as well as comparison of the occurrence of SPMs by the site of diagnosis between the DM and non-DM cohorts and survival analyses. RESULTS: A SPM was diagnosed in 234 (20%) patients, DM in 183 (15%) patients. DM was diagnosed in 22.6% of those with SPM vs. in 13.8% of those without SPM (p=0.001). The most common types of SPMs in DM patients were other CRC, kidney, lung, bladder and nonmelanoma skin cancer, but only carcinoma of the liver and bile duct tracts was significantly more common than in the group without DM. Although breast cancer was the second most common in the group with DM, its incidence was lower than in the group without DM, as well as prostate cancer. A significantly higher incidence of SPMs was found in older CRC patients (≥ 65 years) and in those with lower stage colon cancer and DM. No significant difference in DM treatment between those with and without a SPM was observed including analysis of type of insulin. CONCLUSION: CRC patients with diabetes mellitus, especially those with older age, and early stages of colon cancer, should be screened for second primary malignancies more often than the standard population. Patients without DM have longer survival. According to the occurrence of the most common second malignancies, a clinical examination, blood count, and ultrasound of the abdomen is appropriate, together with standard breast and colorectal cancer screening, and lung cancer screening under certain conditions, and should be recommended in CRC survivors especially in patients with intercurrent DM, however the necessary frequency of screening remains unclear.
Authors: Matthew Alcusky; Scott W Keith; Tom Karagiannis; Carol Rabinowitz; Daniel Z Louis; Vittorio Maio Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Louise Bordeleau; Natalia Yakubovich; Gilles R Dagenais; Julio Rosenstock; Jeffrey Probstfield; Pan Chang Yu; Lars E Ryden; Valdis Pirags; Giatgen A Spinas; Kare I Birkeland; Robert E Ratner; Jose A Marin-Neto; Matyas Keltai; Matthew C Riddle; Jackie Bosch; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Paolo Vigneri; Francesco Frasca; Laura Sciacca; Giuseppe Pandini; Riccardo Vigneri Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: J Rosenstock; V Fonseca; J B McGill; M Riddle; J P Hallé; I Hramiak; P Johnston; M Davis Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jana Halámková; Lucia Bohovicová; Lucie Pehalová; Roman Goněc; Teodor Staněk; Tomáš Kazda; Lucie Mouková; Dagmar Adámková Krákorová; Šárka Kozáková; Marek Svoboda; Regina Demlová; Igor Kiss Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-03-27 Impact factor: 6.639