Literature DB >> 33585148

Will Protective Innovations Like the "Airway Box" Become Routine Practice After the Pandemic?: An Opinion Survey.

Pavithra Ellison1, Benton Nanners1, Gregory Schaefer2, Austin Krueger1, Vipul Dhumak1, Jason L Shepherd1, Khoa Nguyen1, Kathrin Allen3, Matthew Ellison1.   

Abstract

Background Tracheal intubation carries an elevated risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) due to the generation of aerosols containing high concentrations of the virus. An airway box was designed to mitigate the exposure of healthcare professionals performing intubations. Aim We evaluated usability and sustainability in the routine practice of the "airway box" as a protective device during high-risk airway procedures.  Materials and methods After institutional review board approval, clinicians were educated on using the device through simulation, intranet learning modules, and emailed resources. The airway box was made available in the emergency department, critical care units, perioperative area, and operating rooms. QR codes affixed to the box, emailed, and displayed in common areas provided easy access to complete a REDcap survey (Vanderbilt University Nashville, USA) eliciting providers' experience. Data was collected and analyzed between April 1 and July 31, 2020, on REDcap, and the results were analyzed. Results 687 emergent intubations took place. 232 were performed by anesthesiologists, 315 by emergency department providers, and 140 by critical care specialists. 39 surveys were completed, 29 from intubations in the operating room, three from the critical care units, five from interventional radiology suites, and two perioperatively. Providers found the device to be readily available, with a score of 4.51/5, and the majority of providers, 60%, found the device easy to use, rating it either a 4 or 5 out of 5. Providers acquired a mean Mallampati score of 1.75 and 1.40 mean laryngoscopic grade view. Conclusion Intubation boxes may effectively mitigate high-risk viral exposure during airway procedures. Survey responses show that devices were easy to use and did not significantly affect visualization of the airway. Similar to mask use, enclosure devices in clinical practice could become a vital part of medical protective equipment even after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic if they are effectively implemented.
Copyright © 2021, Ellison et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intubation; intubation box; medical device; personal protective equipment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585148      PMCID: PMC7877255          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  12 in total

1.  False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection - Challenges and Implications.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Neeraj Patel; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  COVID-19 and Risks Posed to Personnel During Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  David N Weissman; Marie A de Perio; Lewis J Radonovich
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty.

Authors:  Ryo Wakabayashi; Takashi Ishida; Tomokatsu Yamada; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy.

Authors:  Mahesh Jayaweera; Hasini Perera; Buddhika Gunawardana; Jagath Manatunge
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Melissa Severn; Carmem L Pessoa-Silva; John Conly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Measurement of airborne particle exposure during simulated tracheal intubation using various proposed aerosol containment devices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  J P Simpson; D N Wong; L Verco; R Carter; M Dzidowski; P Y Chan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 12.893

8.  Protecting against COVID-19 aerosol infection during intubation.

Authors:  Jen-Yu Tseng; Hsien-Yung Lai
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study.

Authors:  J L Begley; K E Lavery; C P Nickson; D J Brewster
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 12.893

Review 10.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection risk during elective peri-operative care: a narrative review.

Authors:  J Schutzer-Weissmann; D J Magee; P Farquhar-Smith
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 12.893

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Dome-Shaped Aerosol Box for Protection During a Pandemic.

Authors:  Satoshi Ueno; Masahiro Iwabuchi; Reiko Suzuki; Hitoshi Izuha; Ken Iseki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.