| Literature DB >> 33584880 |
Mohammad Karimi Moridani1, Fatemeh Choopani1, Mandana Kia1.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify differences between abnormal and normal lung signals gathered by an EIT device, which is a new, non-invasive system that seeks the electrical conductivity and permittivity inside a body. Lung performances in patients are investigated using Phase Space Mapping technique on Electrical EIT signals. The database used in this paper contains 82 registered records of 52 individuals with proper lung volume. The results of this paper show that as the delay parameter (τ) increases, the SD1 parameter of phase space mapping indicates a significant difference between normal and abnormal lung volumes. The value of the SD1 parameter with τ = 6 in the case that the lung volume is in a normal condition is 342.57 ± 32.75 while it is 156.71 ± 26.01 in non-optimal mode. This method can be used to identify the patients' lung volumes with chronic respiratory illnesses and is an accurate assessment of the diverse methods to treat respiratory system illnesses in addition to saving various therapeutic costs and dangerous consequences that are likely to occur by using improper treatment methods. It can also reduce the required treatment durations.Entities:
Keywords: electrical impedance tomography; lung volume; phase space mapping; signal processing
Year: 2019 PMID: 33584880 PMCID: PMC7531212 DOI: 10.2478/joeb-2019-0005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Electr Bioimpedance ISSN: 1891-5469
Fig. 1Lungs Classification to four regions.
Fig. 2Electrical Impedance Tomography of lung’s four regions.
Fig. 3Phase space mapping.
Fig. 4A phase space mapping for suitable lung volume.
Fig. 5A phase space mapping for unsuitable lung volume.
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 1.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 89.23 ± 10.45 | 1914.71 ± 203.61 | |
| 94.43 ± 11.76 | 11673.52± 174.11 |
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 2.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 96.51 ± 12.10 | 2104.23 ± 223.25 | |
| 112.67 ± 24.09 | 1716.06± 213.43 |
Fig 6Comparison of the SD1 parameter for different value of the τ.
Fig. 7Comparison of the SD2 parameter for different value of the τ.
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 3.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 118.19 ± 15.75 | 2217.25 ± 228.51 | |
| 158.09 ± 34.12 | 1835.12± 216.41 |
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 4.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 132.54 ± 21/14 | 2375.78 ± 234.01 | |
| 216.37 ± 41/62 | 1932.64± 220.17 |
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 5.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 148.20 ± 24.17 | 2418.23 ± 239.67 | |
| 297.41 ± 49.25 | 2098.27 ± 226.15 |
The average and the standard deviation of the SD1 and SD2 parameters with τ = 6.
| Lung Volume Conditions | SD1 | SD2 |
|---|---|---|
| 156.71 ± 26.01 | 2457.98 ± 245.54 | |
| 342.32 ± 57.75 | 2113.18 ± 230.67 |