Yoko Ohki1,2, Yoshio Igarashi2,3,4, Keita Yamauchi5. 1. Keio Research Institute at SFC, Fujisawa, Japan. 2. Tokyo Institute of Rework for Depression, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Medical Care Ohtemachi Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Japanese Association of Rework for Depression, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work continuation for subjects who RTW after RP participation and treatment as usual (TAU) and subjects who received TAU only were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Additionally, propensity score matching was conducted to control for possible confounds. Results: Log-rank test of overall cohort (n = 323) showed that work continuation of RP + TAU subjects was significantly better compared to that of TAU-only subjects (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found a hazard rate of recurrent sick leave for TAU-only subjects of 2.121 (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.360-3.309). Additionally, the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 100) had similar differences (p = 0.008), with a hazard ratio of recurrent sick leave of 2.871 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.302-6.331) for TAU-only subjects. Limitations: Only workers who RTW after sick leave were targeted, and no examination was made considering cases who dropped out from RP or TAU. Moreover, the sample was a non-randomized controlled trial, with propensity score matching performed. However, there was an inability to retrieve and adjust for working environment background factors after RTW. Conclusions: Work continuation of subjects with RP was observed to be significantly better, suggesting that the RP was effective for recurrent sick leave prevention.
Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work continuation for subjects who RTW after RP participation and treatment as usual (TAU) and subjects who received TAU only were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Additionally, propensity score matching was conducted to control for possible confounds. Results: Log-rank test of overall cohort (n = 323) showed that work continuation of RP + TAU subjects was significantly better compared to that of TAU-only subjects (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found a hazard rate of recurrent sick leave for TAU-only subjects of 2.121 (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.360-3.309). Additionally, the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 100) had similar differences (p = 0.008), with a hazard ratio of recurrent sick leave of 2.871 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.302-6.331) for TAU-only subjects. Limitations: Only workers who RTW after sick leave were targeted, and no examination was made considering cases who dropped out from RP or TAU. Moreover, the sample was a non-randomized controlled trial, with propensity score matching performed. However, there was an inability to retrieve and adjust for working environment background factors after RTW. Conclusions: Work continuation of subjects with RP was observed to be significantly better, suggesting that the RP was effective for recurrent sick leave prevention.
Authors: Paul E Greenberg; Ronald C Kessler; Howard G Birnbaum; Stephanie A Leong; Sarah W Lowe; Patricia A Berglund; Patricia K Corey-Lisle Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Amar K Das; Mark Olfson; Marc J Gameroff; Daniel J Pilowsky; Carlos Blanco; Adriana Feder; Raz Gross; Yuval Neria; Rafael Lantigua; Steven Shea; Myrna M Weissman Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G E Simon; W Katon; C Rutter; M VonKorff; E Lin; P Robinson; T Bush; E A Walker; E Ludman; J Russo Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Ingrid M Bakker; Berend Terluin; Harm W J van Marwijk; Chad M Gundy; Johannes H Smit; Willem van Mechelen; Wim A B Stalman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ingrid M Bakker; Berend Terluin; Harm W J van Marwijk; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Frank Rijmen; Willem van Mechelen; Wim A B Stalman Journal: PLoS Clin Trials Date: 2007-06-01