Nele Struck1, Thomas Gärtner2, Tilo Kircher3, Eva-Lotta Brakemeier1,4. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. 2. Schoen Clinic Bad Arolsen, Bad Arolsen, Germany. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. 4. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Abstract
Objective: Little is known about the specific psychological features that differentiate persistent depressive disorder (PDD) and episodic depression (ED). Thus, the present study aimed to investigate differences in social cognition and interpersonal problems between these two forms of depression and healthy controls. In addition, we aimed to examine childhood maltreatment (CM) as a possible origin of these alterations. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, adult patients with a current PDD (n = 34) or in a current episode of ED (n = 38), and healthy controls (n = 39) completed questionnaires about depression severity, empathy, interpersonal problems, and CM, as well as tests of affective theory of mind and facial emotion recognition. Results: Patients with PDD reported higher empathic distress than patients with ED and healthy controls. Both depressive groups recognized angry faces with higher accuracy and reported more interpersonal problems, with no differences between PDD and ED. Empathic distress and interpersonal problems mediated the link between CM and depression in the combined sample. Limitations: Patient groups were not drug-naïve and antidepressant intake might have influenced social-cognitive functions. Self-report measures of empathy and interpersonal problems are vulnerable to bias. The cross-sectional design does not allow causal conclusions. Conclusion: Depressed patients may not show deficits in decoding the affective states of others and in feeling with others. However, depressed individuals-in particular patients with PDD-may feel easily overwhelmed by emotionally tense situations, resulting in empathic distress and avoidant/submissive interpersonal behavior. Exposure to CM might be an origin of alterations in social cognition and interpersonal problems.
Objective: Little is known about the specific psychological features that differentiate persistent depressive disorder (PDD) and episodic depression (ED). Thus, the present study aimed to investigate differences in social cognition and interpersonal problems between these two forms of depression and healthy controls. In addition, we aimed to examine childhood maltreatment (CM) as a possible origin of these alterations. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, adult patients with a current PDD (n = 34) or in a current episode of ED (n = 38), and healthy controls (n = 39) completed questionnaires about depression severity, empathy, interpersonal problems, and CM, as well as tests of affective theory of mind and facial emotion recognition. Results:Patients with PDD reported higher empathic distress than patients with ED and healthy controls. Both depressive groups recognized angry faces with higher accuracy and reported more interpersonal problems, with no differences between PDD and ED. Empathic distress and interpersonal problems mediated the link between CM and depression in the combined sample. Limitations: Patient groups were not drug-naïve and antidepressant intake might have influenced social-cognitive functions. Self-report measures of empathy and interpersonal problems are vulnerable to bias. The cross-sectional design does not allow causal conclusions. Conclusion:Depressedpatients may not show deficits in decoding the affective states of others and in feeling with others. However, depressed individuals-in particular patients with PDD-may feel easily overwhelmed by emotionally tense situations, resulting in empathic distress and avoidant/submissive interpersonal behavior. Exposure to CM might be an origin of alterations in social cognition and interpersonal problems.
Authors: Christian Banzhaf; Ferdinand Hoffmann; Philipp Kanske; Yan Fan; Henrik Walter; Stephanie Spengler; Stefanie Schreiter; Tania Singer; Felix Bermpohl Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: A Jobst; E-L Brakemeier; A Buchheim; F Caspar; P Cuijpers; K P Ebmeier; P Falkai; R Jan van der Gaag; W Gaebel; S Herpertz; T Kurimay; L Sabaß; K Schnell; E Schramm; C Torrent; D Wasserman; J Wiersma; F Padberg Journal: Eur Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 5.361
Authors: Philip Negt; Eva-Lotta Brakemeier; Johannes Michalak; Lotta Winter; Stefan Bleich; Kai G Kahl Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 2.708