Alexander C S Thomson1, Diego A Portela2, Marta Romano1, Pablo E Otero3. 1. Department of Comparative Diagnostic and Population Medicine, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2. Department of Comparative Diagnostic and Population Medicine, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: dportela@ufl.edu. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an ultrasound-guided approach to intercostal nerve injection and to compare the success rate of intercostal nerve injections using blind or ultrasound-guided technique in canine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, descriptive, experimental anatomic study. ANIMALS: A total of 14 mid-sized adult canine cadavers. METHODS: Ultrasound landmarks were identified by dissection of four cadavers and used to develop an ultrasound-guided technique. The remaining 10 cadavers were randomly assigned to blind (five cadavers) or ultrasound-guided (five cadavers) injections of the third to the ninth intercostal nerves bilaterally with 0.03 mL kg-1 of colorant per injection. The target for intercostal injections was the caudal border of the respective rib, between the internal intercostal membrane and the parietal pleura. Additionally, displacement of the parietal pleura without visible intramuscular distribution was considered the end point for ultrasound-guided injections. For each cadaver, a practitioner in training performed the blocks on one hemithorax, while an experienced practitioner performed the blocks on the opposite hemithorax. Injections were considered successful if ≥1 cm of the target nerve was stained with colorant upon dissection. Success rates and length of nerve staining were analyzed with Fisher's exact and t tests, respectively. Data were considered statistically different with p < 0.05. RESULTS: Success rates of blind and ultrasound-guided technique were 57.1% and 91.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The length of intercostal nerve staining was 3.1 ± 1.2 cm and 3.6 ± 1.0 cm using blind and ultrasound-guided techniques, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences were observed between the two practitioners for blind (p = 0.33) and ultrasound-guided techniques (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of intercostal nerve injections when compared with blind technique, independently of the level of expertise in regional anesthesia.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an ultrasound-guided approach to intercostal nerve injection and to compare the success rate of intercostal nerve injections using blind or ultrasound-guided technique in canine cadavers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, descriptive, experimental anatomic study. ANIMALS: A total of 14 mid-sized adult canine cadavers. METHODS: Ultrasound landmarks were identified by dissection of four cadavers and used to develop an ultrasound-guided technique. The remaining 10 cadavers were randomly assigned to blind (five cadavers) or ultrasound-guided (five cadavers) injections of the third to the ninth intercostal nerves bilaterally with 0.03 mL kg-1 of colorant per injection. The target for intercostal injections was the caudal border of the respective rib, between the internal intercostal membrane and the parietal pleura. Additionally, displacement of the parietal pleura without visible intramuscular distribution was considered the end point for ultrasound-guided injections. For each cadaver, a practitioner in training performed the blocks on one hemithorax, while an experienced practitioner performed the blocks on the opposite hemithorax. Injections were considered successful if ≥1 cm of the target nerve was stained with colorant upon dissection. Success rates and length of nerve staining were analyzed with Fisher's exact and t tests, respectively. Data were considered statistically different with p < 0.05. RESULTS: Success rates of blind and ultrasound-guided technique were 57.1% and 91.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The length of intercostal nerve staining was 3.1 ± 1.2 cm and 3.6 ± 1.0 cm using blind and ultrasound-guided techniques, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences were observed between the two practitioners for blind (p = 0.33) and ultrasound-guided techniques (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of intercostal nerve injections when compared with blind technique, independently of the level of expertise in regional anesthesia.