| Literature DB >> 33583447 |
George A Heckman1,2, Veronique Boscart1,3, Patrick Quail4, Heather Keller1,5, Clare Ramsey6, Vanessa Vucea2, Seema King7, Ikdip Bains2, Nora Choi6, Allan Garland6.
Abstract
As they near the end of life, long term care (LTC) residents often experience unmet needs and unnecessary hospital transfers, a reflection of suboptimal advance care planning (ACP). We applied the knowledge-to-action framework to identify shared barriers and solutions to ultimately improve the process of ACP and improve end-of-life care for LTC residents. We held a 1-day workshop for LTC residents, families, directors/administrators, ethicists, and clinicians from Manitoba, Alberta, and Ontario. The workshop aimed to identify: (1) shared understandings of ACP, (2) barriers to respecting resident wishes, and (3) solutions to better respect resident wishes. Plenary and group sessions were recorded and thematic analysis was performed. We identified four themes: (1) differing provincial frameworks, (2) shared challenges, (3) knowledge products, and 4) ongoing ACP. Theme 2 had four subthemes: (i) lacking clarity on substitute decision maker (SDM) identity, (ii) lacking clarity on the SDM role, (iii) failing to share sufficient information when residents formulate care wishes, and (iv) failing to communicate during a health crisis. These results have informed the development of a standardized ACP intervention currently being evaluated in a randomized trial in three Canadian provinces.Entities:
Keywords: advanced care planning; aging; best practices; comfort care; consent; consentement; end of life; fin de vie; meilleurs pratiques; nursing homes; planification préalable des soins; soins de confort; soins de longue durée; vieillissement
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33583447 DOI: 10.1017/S0714980820000410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Aging ISSN: 0714-9808