Cheryl L Currie1, Suzanne C Tough2. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, M3083 Markin Hall, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4, Canada. cheryl.currie@uleth.ca. 2. Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with illicit drug use among pregnant women who are socioeconomically vulnerable. While it is assumed that the impact of ACEs on illicit drug use in pregnancy is reduced among women with higher socioeconomic status (SES), this assumption is not well tested in the literature. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of maternal ACEs on illicit drug use in a community-based sample of pregnant women with middle to high SES. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study that collected data from 1660 women during and after pregnancy in Calgary, Canada between 2008 and 2011 using mailed surveys. Illicit drug use in pregnancy was self-reported by women at 34-36 weeks gestation. An established scale examined maternal ACEs before 18 years. Logistic regression models and 95% confidence intervals tested associations between maternal ACE scores and illicit drug use in pregnancy. RESULTS: Overall, 3.1% of women in this predominantly married, well-educated, middle and upper middle income sample reported illicit drug use in pregnancy. Women with 2-3 ACEs had more than a two-fold increase, and women with 4 or more ACEs had almost a four-fold increase in illicit drug use in pregnancy, relative to women with 0-1 ACEs after adjustment for confounders. Exposure to child abuse was more consistently associated with illicit drug use in pregnancy than exposure to household dysfunction in childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal ACEs were common and associated with a moderate increase in the odds of illicit drug use in pregnancy among Canadian women with middle to high SES.
BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with illicit drug use among pregnant women who are socioeconomically vulnerable. While it is assumed that the impact of ACEs on illicit drug use in pregnancy is reduced among women with higher socioeconomic status (SES), this assumption is not well tested in the literature. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of maternal ACEs on illicit drug use in a community-based sample of pregnant women with middle to high SES. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study that collected data from 1660 women during and after pregnancy in Calgary, Canada between 2008 and 2011 using mailed surveys. Illicit drug use in pregnancy was self-reported by women at 34-36 weeks gestation. An established scale examined maternal ACEs before 18 years. Logistic regression models and 95% confidence intervals tested associations between maternal ACE scores and illicit drug use in pregnancy. RESULTS: Overall, 3.1% of women in this predominantly married, well-educated, middle and upper middle income sample reported illicit drug use in pregnancy. Women with 2-3 ACEs had more than a two-fold increase, and women with 4 or more ACEs had almost a four-fold increase in illicit drug use in pregnancy, relative to women with 0-1 ACEs after adjustment for confounders. Exposure to child abuse was more consistently associated with illicit drug use in pregnancy than exposure to household dysfunction in childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal ACEs were common and associated with a moderate increase in the odds of illicit drug use in pregnancy among Canadian women with middle to high SES.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse childhood experiences; All our families; Illicit drug use; Pregnancy
Authors: Janet Audrain-McGovern; Daniel Rodriguez; Adam M Leventhal; Jocelyn Cuevas; Kelli Rodgers; Joseph Sass Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jocelynn L Cook; Courtney R Green; Sandra de la Ronde; Colleen A Dell; Lisa Graves; Alice Ordean; James Ruiter; Megan Steeves; Suzanne Wong Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2017-10
Authors: Michael W Varner; Robert M Silver; Carol J Rowland Hogue; Marian Willinger; Corette B Parker; Vanessa R Thorsten; Robert L Goldenberg; George R Saade; Donald J Dudley; Donald Coustan; Barbara Stoll; Radek Bukowski; Matthew A Koch; Deborah Conway; Halit Pinar; Uma M Reddy Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Chad Lance Hemady; Lydia Gabriela Speyer; Aja Louise Murray; Ruth Harriet Brown; Franziska Meinck; Deborah Fry; Huyen Do; Siham Sikander; Bernadette Madrid; Asvini Fernando; Susan Walker; Michael Dunne; Sarah Foley; Claire Hughes; Joseph Osafo; Adriana Baban; Diana Taut; Catherine L Ward; Vo Van Thang; Pasco Fearon; Mark Tomlinson; Sara Valdebenito; Manuel Eisner Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.105