Olav Amundsen1, Nina Køpke Vøllestad2, Ingebrigt Meisingset3, Hilde Stendal Robinson2. 1. Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P. O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. olavamu@gmail.com. 2. Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P. O box 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. 3. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Goal setting is linked to person-centred care and is a core component in physiotherapy, but the associations between goal classes, patient characteristics and outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders has not been investigated. The study's purpose was to examine 1) how goals used in clinical practice for patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are distributed in classes based on ICF, 2) if goal classes were associated with patient characteristics and 3) whether goal classes were associated with treatment outcome. METHODS: Data analysis from a longitudinal observational study (N = 2591). Goals were classified in symptom, function/structure, activity/participation and non-classifiable. Associations between patient characteristics and goal classes were examined using x2 and one-way ANOVA. Association between goal classes and outcomes were examined using multiple logistic and linear regression models. Outcomes are reported at 3 months or end of treatment if prior to 3 months. RESULTS: There was a high variability in goals used for patients with MSD. 17% had symptom goals, 32.3% function/structure, 43.4% activity/participation and 7.4% non-classifiable goals. We found significant associations between goal classes and age, gender, severity, region of pain/diagnosis and emotional distress (all p < .001). Activity/participation goals were associated with better outcomes on GPE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.66). Non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes on pain intensity (B .87, 95% CI .32-1.43). CONCLUSION: There is an association between goal classes and patient characteristics. Including activity/participation in the main goal was associated with better outcomes for GPE and having a non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes for pain intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project is approved by the Regional committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (REC no. 2013/2030). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626389 .
BACKGROUND: Goal setting is linked to person-centred care and is a core component in physiotherapy, but the associations between goal classes, patient characteristics and outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders has not been investigated. The study's purpose was to examine 1) how goals used in clinical practice for patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are distributed in classes based on ICF, 2) if goal classes were associated with patient characteristics and 3) whether goal classes were associated with treatment outcome. METHODS: Data analysis from a longitudinal observational study (N = 2591). Goals were classified in symptom, function/structure, activity/participation and non-classifiable. Associations between patient characteristics and goal classes were examined using x2 and one-way ANOVA. Association between goal classes and outcomes were examined using multiple logistic and linear regression models. Outcomes are reported at 3 months or end of treatment if prior to 3 months. RESULTS: There was a high variability in goals used for patients with MSD. 17% had symptom goals, 32.3% function/structure, 43.4% activity/participation and 7.4% non-classifiable goals. We found significant associations between goal classes and age, gender, severity, region of pain/diagnosis and emotional distress (all p < .001). Activity/participation goals were associated with better outcomes on GPE (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.66). Non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes on pain intensity (B .87, 95% CI .32-1.43). CONCLUSION: There is an association between goal classes and patient characteristics. Including activity/participation in the main goal was associated with better outcomes for GPE and having a non-classifiable goal was associated with poorer outcomes for pain intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project is approved by the Regional committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (REC no. 2013/2030). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03626389 .
Authors: Nicole van der Roer; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Geertruida E Bekkering; Maurits W van Tulder; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ivan Lin; Louise Wiles; Rob Waller; Roger Goucke; Yusuf Nagree; Michael Gibberd; Leon Straker; Chris G Maher; Peter P B O'Sullivan Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Ingebrigt Meisingset; Ottar Vasseljen; Nina K Vøllestad; Hilde S Robinson; Astrid Woodhouse; Kaia B Engebretsen; Mari Glette; Cecilie K Øverås; Anne L Nordstoga; Kari A I Evensen; Eivind S Skarpsno Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Laura Viester; Evert A L M Verhagen; Karen M Oude Hengel; Lando L J Koppes; Allard J van der Beek; Paulien M Bongers Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 2.362